Is this the UT prediction thread? Just checking.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you think I'm winning? Just kidding.Is this the UT prediction thread? Just checking.
Scholz..... firing strikes from the bullpen. Easy my man..... the 8th inning is coming.Just wondering why the main poster in the UT prediction thread is an aggy touting the SEC that’s all. Thought you didn’t want to play.
We have an average offense who can develop into a slightly above average offense. Even with our very good running backs and elite receiving corps cannot make up for our quarterbacks, offensive line and offensive play calling. Our D will keep us in most games unless they get sick of bailing us out of successive 3 and outs. If we can get average production from the offense, we win 8 games.
So let me get this straight. Players come into the SEC much more highly thought of than those coming into the BIG12. The average class in the SEC ranks just over 20 nationally, whereas the average BIG12 class comes in around 40th.So let me get this straight. Players come into the SEC much more highly thought of than those coming into the BIG12. The average class in the SEC ranks just over 20th nationally, whereas the average BIG12 class comes in around 40th.
Then when those players are available to be drafted by the NFL 3 times more get selected from the SEC than the BIG12.
But somehow magically, there is a 4 year window where players not nearly as good coming or going are equal for 4 years. Even with this magical 4 year transformation, the SEC has won 9 of the last 12 national champions, and even if Alabama didn't count - they would still have 100% more championships than any other conference over that period. And even without Alabama, the SEC would have more championships than all other conference combined over that period.
So I am struggling to see why you want to argue schedules. Why not just say you think Texas would likely beat A&M if they played this year, I would agree with you.
I don't know how to debate you on who brings in the better players. An average class of 20th seems much better than 40th. But I guess that is debatable.So let me get this straight. Players come into the SEC much more highly thought of than those coming into the BIG12. The average class in the SEC ranks just over 20 nationally, whereas the average BIG12 class comes in around 40th.
"much more highly thought of" is hyperbole
Then when those players are available to be drafted by the NFL 3 times more get selected from the SEC than the BIG12.
Not sure how you came up with this number, but it's not true.
But somehow magically, there is a 4 year window where players not nearly as good coming or going are equal for 4 years. Even with this magical 4 year transformation, the SEC has won 9 of the last 12 national champions, and even if Alabama didn't count - they would still have 100% more championships than any other conference over that period. And even without Alabama, the SEC would have more championships than all other conference combined over that period.
Not only were your numbers off again, but we need to clarify something. Conferences don't win national championships, a single team does. I know ya'll are in the habit of piggy-backing off of any success other teams in your conference have like it's your own, but a national championship is one team vs. another.
Further, no one is claiming the SEC hasn't been good at the very top (at least in that very convenient for you time frame you picked). Most seasons they have at least one if not two very good teams at the top. And on top of that, seven of those nine championships were won by Nick Saban and Urban Meyer. Those two coaches win regardless of conference. However, what we are supposed to be discussing is a conference. The whole conference.
And last, the facts of reality still remain.....during those four years of college football you speak of the SEC, AS A WHOLE, does not dominate or offer any superiority on any consistent basis in actual football games. I could go on an on of examples of that. So why argue about abstract, subjective measures like high school recruiting rankings and not the results on the field?
So I am struggling to see why you want to argue schedules. Why not just say you think Texas would likely beat A&M if they played this year, I would agree with you
I don't want to argue schedules, I'm just providing evidence against the suggestion you started on this very thread, and the endless Aggie claims that their schedule year in year out is just out of this world brutal and the Big 12 is so easy (ironic) and the worst conference and so on.
I may be in the minority, but, I just love what Daniel Young brings. Toneil Carter I also like quite a bit, but to a lesser extent. I think I will be proven right as the season rolls along.RB room is so good we brought in a grad transfer! C. Johnson and LJH have the size to be elite but LJH is the only one of the two catching it in traffic. CJ will wow you and follow it up by blowing the routine catch.
I may be in the minority, but, I just love what Daniel Young brings. Toneil Carter I also like quite a bit, but to a lesser extent. I think I will be proven right as the season rolls along.
As far as the receivers go, don't sleep on Duvernay. We will see how this group performs, but, I was just convinced it was coaching when Strong was around and last year our OL allowed our QBs a fraction of a second to get the ball off before getting pounded. I think some improvement in the OL and QB will allow our receivers to get down field and make some plays.
I may be in the minority, but, I just love what Daniel Young brings. Toneil Carter I also like quite a bit, but to a lesser extent. I think I will be proven right as the season rolls along.
As far as the receivers go, don't sleep on Duvernay. We will see how this group performs, but, I was just convinced it was coaching when Strong was around and last year our OL allowed our QBs a fraction of a second to get the ball off before getting pounded. I think some improvement in the OL and QB will allow our receivers to get down field and make some plays.
I'm glad you admitted this first......I don't know why but every time I hear the name Toneil Carter I keep wanting to say toenail Carter.
Who voted for 5!?! We had distractions and injuries last year and we went 7-6.
I sure hope it was an aggy or gooner and not a "fan".
Lol at you pooping your pants if you find out it was clob......
Who voted for 5!?! We had distractions and injuries last year and we went 7-6.
I sure hope it was an aggy or gooner and not a "fan".
I agree with you.Terrible OL and three 4th quarter or overtime boneheaded plays by a true freshmen QB from 3 more wins last year is why I'm in the 9-3 camp. An average OL and teaching Ehlinger to throw it way would be a difference maker.
Who voted for 5!?! We had distractions and injuries last year and we went 7-6.
I sure hope it was an aggy or gooner and not a "fan".
I would like to see Ryan Bujcevski and Cameron Dicker start in the first game. Maybe Michael Dickson has started a tradition of Australian rugby style kickers at Texas and Ryan Bujcevski is next in line. We haven't had a good kicker since Anthony Fera in 2013. I'd love to see Dicker come in make is forget about Joshua Rowland.
Good defense and a good kicking game would go a long way to hitting the 9 win mark.
If Dicker isn't a good kicker then maybe he can try adult cinema. Got the name for it.Our punting was All-Pro the last 2 years. I dont expect even half that and that's not a bad thing. Definitely more concerned with kickoffs and FGs. Dicker should be at least as good as what we've already got right?
^^^
Fera is tied Dawson for the UT consecutive FGs made record with 15. He is the only other Texas all Big 12 first team PK than Dawson. He made a 50 yarder. I don't think we tried much over 35 yards this past season. He wasn't recovered from his injury for his Jr year but had an excellent Sr year. As a punter he was up there with Dicko for pinning teams back.