ADVERTISEMENT

Is the Era of Conservatism Over?

Travis Galey

@travisgaley
Moderator
Aug 12, 2012
36,993
67,727
113
The Washington Post (I know, save it), had an interesting take today looking at Ronald Reagan's 1977 CPAC speech and comparing it to the GOP of today. Do you agree with their conclusions? If so, why? If not, why not?

-- Forty years ago this month, speaking at the same conference, Ronald Reagan offered a searing critique of Marxist-Leninism that could be read today as an indictment of Trumpism. “All the facts of the real world have to be fitted to the Procrustean bed of Marx and Lenin,” he explained. “If the facts don’t happen to fit the ideology, the facts are chopped off and discarded. I consider this to be the complete opposite to principled conservatism. When a conservative states that the free market is the best mechanism ever devised by the mind of man to meet material needs, he is merely stating what a careful examination of the real world has told him is the truth. When a conservative says that totalitarian communism is an absolute enemy of human freedom, he is not theorizing. He is reporting the ugly reality captured so unforgettably in the writings of Alexander Solzhenitsyn.”

Reagan’s 1977 CPAC speech remains one of the most important political addresses he ever delivered. Fresh off his loss to Gerald Ford in the Republican primaries, and Jimmy Carter’s victory in the general, the former California governor went on to presciently outline a vision for “A New Republican Party” that would unite fiscal, social and national security conservatives in common cause. His clarion call helped win him his party’s nomination in 1980, ushered in the first political realignment since Franklin Roosevelt and allowed the GOP to win five of the next seven presidential elections.

-- Alas, the Reagan Era is over. And if you needed another data point that the Party of Reagan has been hijacked, this week’s “conservative” confab offers many. Needless to say, Trump will not quote Solzhenitsyn when he speaks here later this morning. Reagan embraced freedom in all of its forms – from the aspirations of Eastern Europeans looking to throw off the yoke of their Russian overlords to open markets and, to a lesser degree, open borders.

It’s always fraught to speculate on what a historical figure, who died 13 years ago, would say about current events. But based on a decade of closely studying the 40th president, including countless hours reviewing his archives, it seems safe to stipulate the following: Reagan would frown upon the dark portrait that Trump paints of his shining city upon a hill. He would be disturbed by his protectionist and isolationist rhetoric. And he would be aghast at the 45th president repeatedly drawing false moral equivalency between the United States and Russia.

Reagan would never have suggested that Vladimir Putin, a former KGB agent who presides over an authoritarian regime, is a stronger leader than Barack Obama. Among the many words Trump says that would never have come out of Reagan’s mouth: “There are a lot of killers. We've got a lot of killers. What, you think our country is so innocent?"

-- Kellyanne Conway, counselor to the president, said during her appearance at CPAC yesterday that by the time Trump addresses the group, the conference will be known as “TPAC.” As in the Trump Political Action Conference.

Conway’s line “spoke volumes about the way that the Republican Party has been altered by the rise of Trump, and it sparked alarm even among attendees at the conference,” Yahoo’s Jon Ward reports. Two quotes from his piece:

  • “I think that’s dangerous,” said Sarah Markley, a student at Grove City College near Pittsburgh. “I think that we should first stick to our principles and look for somebody who embodies those.”
  • Conservative radio talk show host Mark Levin also bristled: “It’s conservative political action conference. That’s what it is. It’ll be that 10 years from now. When I worked for Reagan, we didn’t call it RPAC. So I would remind them about that.”
Indeed, if any of the top three aides who made up Reagan’s Troika during his first year in office had made a comment like that, the president probably would have called them into the Oval and chastised them. But he never needed to. Because Jim Baker, Ed Meese and Mike Deaver each understood that the conservative movement was way bigger than Reagan.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back