possibly. I'm still not willing to give benefit of the doubt.
Don’t blame ya.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
possibly. I'm still not willing to give benefit of the doubt.
You still haven't tried to make a case for any player ahead of him.
Emmitt's resume is whipped out in front of everyone and it's BIG.
Emmitt Smith ran behind a great line, with a HOF QB and WR taking away a lot of heat. Not to mention great TE play.
Walter Payton largely played with a dogshat team during his career. And yet Walter averaged more YPC than Emmitt. Seems very logical to me that Walter’s stats would be enhanced greatly by being on those Cowboy teams.
Earl averaged more yards per carry too. No doubt at all that at their prime, Earl was better than Emmitt, but he didn’t last long enough to make the case emphatically.
I’ve never agreed with you on anything as much as I agree with you about Emmitt.He was great. He's the Bill Russell of the NFL.
Emmitt's resume dwarfs Walter's.
Emmit Smith broke 5 yards per carry once in his career. And averaged 4.2 per carry.
That's such an intellectually dishonest post.Ron Dayne broke Ricky Williams' NCAA career yardage record. Do you think Ron Dayne is a better running back than Ricky Williams? You should, based on the logic you are using to push Emmitt Smith as the best RB of all time.
How many years did Jim Brown have an MVP Quarterback? or multiple all pro lineman and and all pro receiver.
Take off the Blue colored glasses. You can't win this not sure any NFL analysts would agree with you. Stick to your expertise college football.
It's a damn shame Walter wasn't as big in the playoffs or in big games as Emmitt.Except that, on average, Walter gained more yards than Emmitt every time he carried the ball, and he did so with teammates over the course of his career that exactly zero people in NFL history would say matched up to the talent of Emmitt’s teammates.
But other than that, sure...
Maybe because hw retired at 29 because he could make more money doing movies.Brown also got to be larger than the guys trying to tackle him and had the advantage of playing fewer games. Brown played in 118 career regular season games and four playoff games, a total of 122 professional games. Emmitt Smith was one shy of double that number of games, at 243. That type of wear and tear (against substantially larger and faster opponents) takes a massive toll that Brown didn't have to pay.
Barry Sanders gets a lot of love as the GOAT, but I don't think he is.
He may be the best "pure runner" and had the most electrifying single runs, but he wasn't a complete back.
Barry Sanders would rip off an incredible run for 49 yards, and then they give him the rock one play later and he loses three yards. Then the offense is in 2nd and 13. Passing down at a disadvantage. I believe he led the NFL in most runs for a loss and most runs for no gain most years he played.
He had 10 years in the league and won how many playoff games? You don't think he had any decent OL during that entire time?
Barry Sanders was an incredible runner and I do think he's top 5, but not THE best.
Yeah because where you are drafted dictates how great you are. He did really well at 40 playing with Rich Gannon by the way. Ironically enough the 49ers traded up to get him otherwise the Cowboys intended on taking him in the 1st round.Jerry Rice had some of the greatest quarterbacks of all time. You put Jerry with some of the quarterbacks Larry Fitzgerald or Steve Smith or Andre Johnson had and he's a mediocre receiver. Only a 49ers fan would ever think Jerry Rice is the best wide receiver all time. That line forms behind Larry Fitzgerald and Andre Johnson for sure, and for my money Jerry couldn't carry Larry's jock. There's a reason Jerry didn't go until the 16th pick in the first round in the draft. The greatest wide receiver of all time would never last that long.
Except that, on average, Walter gained more yards than Emmitt every time he carried the ball, and he did so with teammates over the course of his career that exactly zero people in NFL history would say matched up to the talent of Emmitt’s teammates.
But other than that, sure...
What are you talking about I was discussing running backs.How many years did Jerry Rice have an MVP Quarterback? Or multiple all pro lineman and and all pro running backs?
Take off the Red colored glasses. You can't win this not sure any NFL analysts would agree with you. Stick to your expertise college football
You seem to be doing just fine. I asked a legit question and you answered with snarkiness. Hope you are proud. You know, it is a discussion board, not a competition to see who can put another in his place. But I guess you don’t want to have a common decency discussion. Just win the debate and you are now master of the universe...yay for you.
That's such an intellectually dishonest post.
As if Smith's ace up his sleeve is merely his rushing yards... you're not making debate great again.
Yeah because where you are drafted dictates how great you are. He did really well at 40 playing with Rich Gannon by the way. Ironically enough the 49ers traded up to get him otherwise the Cowboys intended on taking him in the 1st round.
What are you talking about I was discussing running backs.
Again, you just skip right past the point that was rightfully made and delve into tomfoolery.You don't think comparing Ron Dayne and Ricky Williams, what they did in college, which one is really a better running back and citing their relative yards gained in college, as a comparison to you're pushing Emmitt Smith as the greatest back of all time based on his numbers, is applying standards of rational evaluation to the discussion at hand?
Really?
The definition of intellectual dishonestly is judging others or their opinions more critically than you judge your own. That would be you, Ketch.
Just mention Emmitt and watch Cowboys haters’ heads explode everywhere. They foam and froth at the mouth, yet are incapable of intelligently, logically assailing Emmitt’s resume and greatness.
Look up Emmitt’s YAC and tell me again how he had it so easy, or that he wasn’t great. Go look at Emmitt’s highlight tapes and tell me he was just some spare who only succeeded because of his line. I put his highlight tapes up against anyone’s. Anyone’s.
Again, you just skip right past the point that was rightfully made and delve into tomfoolery.
Terrible write-up @Ketchum, but only because I'm reading it under my original username which I've been asking you to change for 2 WEEKS AND COUNTING
Change
My
Name
Edit: I'll read it later
???? Troy Aikman got sacked only 46 times between 94 and 96. He had a great offensive line. Smith carries a team to a Super bowl with 158 total yards and it is a signature moment but Brown has 151 total yards in the 64 Championship game well in your eyes it was not a signature moment. What is the difference?It's a damn shame Walter wasn't as big in the playoffs or in big games as Emmitt.
It's not Emmitt's fault that he carried a team on his back in a Super Bowl and Walter never did.
It'snot Emmitt's fault that Walter couldn't make his linemen as good as Emmitt made his.