ADVERTISEMENT

Ketch's 10 Thoughts From The Weekend (The truth may hurt, but it's the truth)

Card is much more likely to stay if he loses the battle. He just got into the business school.
If he’s a 5 star talent why would he wait year(s) behind Thompson? I get that you are predicting he eventually takes over, but I see him thinking he can start for a different team and heads to the portal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DKinnamon
If he’s a 5 star talent why would he wait year(s) behind Thompson? I get that you are predicting he eventually takes over, but I see him thinking he can start for a different team and heads to the portal.
Seems to have a different vibe. That could be wrong, it's just what is in the air.

I believe he starts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DKinnamon
Keep reading that we really need to win to turn this around but at least with Oregon not sure that adds up. Clemson, Ohio State and Alabama I’m in agreement.

Oregon record since 2016 - AND THEYRE in the PAC-12

Oregon
2016 4-8
2017 7-6
2018 9-4
2019 12-2
2020 4-3

They’ve won 36 games in 5 years that’s 1 less than TX. We’ve won 4 straight bowl games (albeit only 1 was a New Years 6) . They did play for a Naty 6 years ago. Everyone says we have the greatest offensive mind in coaching and he’s surrounded by the top assistants…:but still we lose home state kids to go play 2 times zones away in a sht’er conference than the Big XII. There has to be more to this than “winning”. We need somebody to do a complete deep dive into what is going on. Don’t just lean on winning and assume all will be well with a 10 win season. Hell SMU took top WR in the country and unless I’ve been in a coma for 35 years they're not lighting up the record books!
It has been a rough couple weeks. I have complete faith in this new staff. I just don’t want to miss something and hope we’re truly trying to learn from what’s happening. No honeymoon class this year.
 
Keep reading that we really need to win to turn this around but at least with Oregon not sure that adds up. Clemson, Ohio State and Alabama I’m in agreement.

Oregon record since 2016 - AND THEYRE in the PAC-12

Oregon
2016 4-8
2017 7-6
2018 9-4
2019 12-2
2020 4-3

They’ve won 36 games in 5 years that’s 1 less than TX. We’ve won 4 straight bowl games (albeit only 1 was a New Years 6) . They did play for a Naty 6 years ago. Everyone says we have the greatest offensive mind in coaching and he’s surrounded by the top assistants…:but still we lose home state kids to go play 2 times zones away in a sht’er conference than the Big XII. There has to be more to this than “winning”. We need somebody to do a complete deep dive into what is going on. Don’t just lean on winning and assume all will be well with a 10 win season. Hell SMU took top WR in the country and unless I’ve been in a coma for 35 years they're not lighting up the record books!
It has been a rough couple weeks. I have complete faith in this new staff. I just don’t want to miss something and hope we’re truly trying to learn from what’s happening. No honeymoon class this year.
This was a historically abnormal recruitment. Still is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SVR45
One good thing about Banks committing to Oregon is that we will not have to play against him if he indeed signs. It is still difficult for me to believe that the University of Texas cannot attract 5 offensive lineman in a state that is as big as Texas. Surely there are 5 guys in Texas that would like to come to Austin and play for such a storied program. Jimmy Jackson
 
What’s happened in recruiting isn’t news to most. Most have accepted the fact Texas is far behind many schools in relative terms of recruiting. Whether it is because of performance, facilities, politics, location, trend, or a combination of all. It’s fact. The name alone doesn’t carry anywhere near the weigh it once did a short 10-15yrs ago. It’s been a clown fire dumpster show for the world to see. And they noticed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stevenspaul1357
Keep reading that we really need to win to turn this around but at least with Oregon not sure that adds up. Clemson, Ohio State and Alabama I’m in agreement.

Oregon record since 2016 - AND THEYRE in the PAC-12

Oregon
2016 4-8
2017 7-6
2018 9-4
2019 12-2
2020 4-3

They’ve won 36 games in 5 years that’s 1 less than TX. We’ve won 4 straight bowl games (albeit only 1 was a New Years 6) . They did play for a Naty 6 years ago. Everyone says we have the greatest offensive mind in coaching and he’s surrounded by the top assistants…:but still we lose home state kids to go play 2 times zones away in a sht’er conference than the Big XII. There has to be more to this than “winning”. We need somebody to do a complete deep dive into what is going on. Don’t just lean on winning and assume all will be well with a 10 win season. Hell SMU took top WR in the country and unless I’ve been in a coma for 35 years they're not lighting up the record books!
It has been a rough couple weeks. I have complete faith in this new staff. I just don’t want to miss something and hope we’re truly trying to learn from what’s happening. No honeymoon class this year.
I agree with most of what you said, but I believe you left out a critical piece and it's the piece that impacts us more than Clemson, Bama, TOSU and an outlier like Oregon, it's ou. We can't get past the gorilla in our own conference whom (according to the recruiting services) we out recruit damn near every year. You think kids in the state of texas are blind to the 6 straight titles and multiple playoff births? Hell when top in state recruits take a visit up north and to the 40 acres they get to see the huge discrepancy in the trophy cases. We have them taking pics in front of swimming trophies and they have them taking them in front of football trophies. We need to forget the buckeyes, crimson tide, tigers and even aggies of the world and focus our attention on the north. Sad to say, but NONE of our goals are achievable without going through them to get there.
 
In Banks interview after committing he said it was between Oregon and Aggy,we were not even a consideration so there was no surprise loss. Make no mistake ,this is about money and percieved money to come later.--utx
 
ee0e3a40b744e2eebc3b4d949eaa9055x.jpg

Let's not cry over all of the spilled milk that Kelvin Banks left on the floor for Steve Sarkisian and his staff on Sunday.

It happened.

Track marks remain.

Possible implications for future recruiting decisions have been created.

Everyone knew going into this month that Banks' decision represented a critical crossroads in the quest for Sarkisian and Co. to put together a top five national recruiting class and an offensive line group that would make Longhorns fans feel better about the disaster that was 2021 offensive line recruiting. Well, when the decision goes the other way, we can't suddenly emerge from the dust and pretend that nothing happened while an inch of mulch is covering everyone from head to filthy flip-flops.

The reality is that Sarkisian is not getting the same benefit of the doubt that Charlie Strong and Tom Herman received only a few years ago. Maybe all of this feels a little too much like the Little Boy Who Cried Wolf to the teenagers of the Lone Star State. The reason why it exists matters less than the reality of its existence.

Sarkisian is going to have to win to turn this around.

The elite of the elite prospects, the kind that win national championships and project as future first- or second-day NFL draft picks, want to see it with their own eyes. Sark isn't being afforded a ghost-man on second base to jump start a run-scoring inning in recruiting in 2022. As strong as this staff is on paper on the recruiting front, it apparently cannot yet make it rain in head-to-head competitions for the biggest difference-makers.

That's not my opinion. That is just what is happening.

From my vantage point, what has to happen next is way more about reversing the trend with the 2023 recruiting class than it is daydreaming about being able to flip kids that have passed on the Longhorns in 2022. I'm not saying that it isn't possible, I'm just saying that if we get to five months from National Signing Day and the best prospects on your recruiting board still want to see you do something on the field before making a leap of faith, what those prospects are really doing is putting you in a friend-zone. Like all friend-zone situations, it's not always a death blow, but it's usually one.

Texas must beat Louisiana. Texas must beat Arkansas. Texas must beat Oklahoma. Texas must win 10 games. Texas must play in a major bowl game.

Anything short of that and we're all at major risk of finding ourselves in this same exact situation with the elite of the elite in the Class of 2023.

This isn't me screaming "fire!" in a crowded theater (do those even exist any more?), as much as it's me simply stating loudly enough for everyone to hear that keeping your head on a swivel is a must.

Nothing should surprise you. Don't let anyone convince you that there are burnt-orange locks out there. There is no need for panic. The stakes are the stakes, whether anyone likes it or not.

Texas needs to win now and win big or it will continue to lose the elite of the elite in recruiting.

You can absolutely take that to the Bank(s).

No. 2 - About that top five recruiting class...

A month ago, I wrote that in order for the Longhorns to finish with a top five level recruiting class, they would need to essentially run the table with the following prospects:








With Banks currently off the market, the wiggle room left for this class to emerge as a true success based on the standards we hold Texas football recruiting against is minimal. Let's take a look at the remaining five.

Anderson: Has twice seemingly been on the verge of committing to Texas, only to twice emerge as the runaway bride. Texas has long been the leader, make no mistake about that, but it remains unclear where the Longhorns are truly positioned at the moment. Texas A&M is a very, very serious threat.

Campbell: Am I allowed to say that the earlier this thing ends, the better for Texas? The Longhorns are still the betting favorite and getting him to take an unofficial visit in June was critical following his visit to Oklahoma., but I'm a little concerned about perceived momentum among top prospects if Texas loses both Anderson and Banks before the season starts.

Harris: See Campbell. I still have Texas as a leader over Alabama, but will he pick Texas if it loses momentum?

Stewart: He has the Longhorns in the friend-zone until he sees this offense in action and gets a little convinced with the product on the field that he needs to take his five-star talent to a place representing a gamble when he doesn't have to gamble.

Thompson: Total toss-up recruitment at this point. Feels like a looming Texas vs. Texas A&M battle.

Full transparency: That was a depressing section. Let's talk about something positive...

No. 3 - Three thoughts from the Elite 11 ...

a. We all know that Maalik Murphy still has steps to take as a player on the field and that he'll arrive at Texas as a bit of multi-year project, but his performance at the Elite 11 this week in California should make Texas fans feel very good about what the Longhorns have knocking on the doorstep when Murphy arrives in Austin. Consider what the writers covering the event from Sports Illustrated said once the event was over and Murphy finished second in their own rankings behind Austin Westlake's Cade Klubnik.

"The film evaluation for Maalik Murphy as a college prospect may seem shaky, as he lacks production and substantial game experience. But if his performance at the Elite 11 Finals suggested anything, his game is littered with untapped potential.

The most impressive physical specimen on site, Murphy displayed one of the strongest arms on the group and surprisingly solid accuracy to pair over the week, also gelling with his receivers and making well-timed tosses. Touch and anticipation for throwing windows should continue to progress as Murphy develops in Steve Sarkisian's offense at Texas, but the Longhorns have everything to work with when it comes to the Gardena (Calif.) Serra product."

It doesn't come with a guarantee on the box, but it's no small thing that he stood on the same field as 19 of the best quarterbacks in the country and largely outperformed all of them on multiple days. That doesn't happen by accident. I've said that if/when Murphy signs, he'll be the highest-ranked quarterback prospect that Texas has signed since Garrett Gilbert. That's true. But, it needs to be said that he has better tools than Gilbert had, and he's still playing on Sundays for America's Team. Gilbert was a special high school player, but he's never thrown a football in his life quite as well as Murphy.

b. Speaking of Klubnik, he's now competed against national No.1 overall prospect Quinn Ewers on four different occasions (the state title game and three days of practice in California) and his overall record vs. Ewers is...

4-0.

By all accounts, Klubnik was better in the state title game and he was better in every day of competition this week. I'm not sure what it means, but I have a hard time ranking a quarterback as the No.1 overall prospect in the nation when he's never been better.... just once... any time he's been matched up with his No.1 on-field rival (that expression is used very loosely here) in competition.

Yo Rivals, pay that man his money. Give him his fifth star.

c. Low-key event of the entire week was Flower Mound High's Nick Evers finishing third over the course of the week in the SI rankings. Evers, who is committed to Florida, is currently rated as the No. 9 dual-threat quarterback in the nation and he outperformed every elite pro-style guy in the country outside of Klubnik and Murphy? That's freaking impressive.

No. 4 - What's next with offensive line recruiting...

A week ago, I would have told you that Texas was probably in for a five-man offensive line class that would include Kelvin Banks, Devon Campbell, Cam Williams, Cole Hutson and Connor Robertson.

A week later, Banks and Williams are out of the mix and it's hard to know exactly how Texas puts together a five-man class with anywhere near the sizzle of projections from a week ago.

So, now what?

Let's run through the discussion and options.

a. With Robertson and Hutson locked up, Campbell is clearly the most critical prospect remaining in the entire recruiting class. Texas HAS to land Campbell and then sort through its remaining options at the tackle position because that is where help is most needed.



b. When looking at serious candidates to fill the voids, finding a way to land Allen's Neto Umeozulu. The Longhorns have kind of slow-played him up until now and it might end up being a fatal blow, but he's only taken one official visit to USC, so there would appear to be room to get back involved seriously. Maybe go all-in on the other Duncanville tackle Jaylen Early, but there's been a lot of Florida State buzz for him lately. Those are the only in-state offers left on the board outside of Campbell and Dewberry that remain uncommitted. I'm not really sure where the out of state help comes from at this point. Someone like Earnest Greene feels like a pipedream.

c. Best offensive linemen in the state that the Longhorns haven't offered who possess tackle upside:

High three-star - Austin Kawecki (Frisco Lebanon Trail) - Committed to Oklahoma State
Mid three-star - Cory Hendrix (College Station) - Committed to SMU
Mid three-star Nikolas Hall (Austin High) - Committed to Kentucky
Low three-star Jihad Lateef (Lubbock Estacado) - Committed to Washington State

d. The last thought on this is that the Longhorns simply don't take five offensive linemen in this class and save that final spot for a lineman in the Portal next spring.

No. 5 - Other random recruiting scattershots...

... Freaking Oregon is going to sign a better OL class from the state of Texas than...Texas? Wow.

... Oklahoma received a flood of commitments over the weekend, but none were super blues.

... I kind of doubt that Jordan Hudson sticks with SMU, despite his commitment on Sunday to the Mustangs, but it is one hell of a win for former Texas staffer Ra'Shaad Samples. He's not going to be at SMU for very long.

... The state of Texas might have 10 legit five-star prospects in the state of Texas for the Class of 2022 and I'm very close to adding Florida commit Julian Humphrey to the mix.


... One of the all-time stupid futurecast blunders occurred on Sunday when I wasn't paying attention and futurecasted him to Oklahoma when I knew he was going to SMU.
tumblr_o3oipnqiZR1qzpn6vo2_540.gif


No. 6 - A reminder about offensive line recruiting...

I posted this in a thread on the site earlier this weekend, but here's a reminder of the OL recruiting data that I produced last year. I'll update it in the next week or so.

From 2002-15, here's a look at the performance breakdown of each of the top four rankings tiers in the Rivals.com rankings system with regards to players being drafted in the NFL.

* 46.3% (25 of 54) of five-star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams:
* 34.2% (28 of 82) of high-four star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams
* 23.0% (26 of 113) of mid-four star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams
* 14.7% (50 of 341) of low four-star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams.

From 2002-15, here's a look at the performance breakdown of each of the top four rankings tiers in the Rivals.com rankings system with regards to players from the state of Texas being drafted in the NFL.

* 22.2% (2 of 9) of five-star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams:
* 35.7% (5 of 14) of high-four star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams
* 6.7% (1 of 15) of mid-four star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams
* 21.1% (8 of 38) of low four-star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams.

From 2002-15, here's a look at the performance breakdown of each of the top four rankings tiers in the Rivals.com rankings system with regards to Longhorns from the state of Texas being drafted in the NFL.

* 33.3% (1 of 3) of five-star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams:
* 14.3% (1 of 7) of high-four star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams
* 0.0% (0 of 6) of mid-four star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams
* 8.3% (1 of 12) of low four-star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams.

What's interesting about the data as it relates to the state of Texas is how much the numbers improve in a couple of areas when you pull the Longhorns out of the development equation.

* 57.1% (4 of 7) of high-four star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams
* 11.1% (1 of 9) of mid-four star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams
* 26.9% (7 of 26) of low four-star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams.

No. 7 – BUY or SELL …

BUY-SELL.gif



(Sell) I'm thinking they take four and save that spot for the Portal or for another place in the class later in the year.



(Buy) Texas isn't headed for a Top 5 class. I once thought Texas would moonwalk into a Top 5 class with relative ease like Michael Jackson at the Motown 25. I don't remotely believe that now.



(Sell) His quarterback development and the ability to turn Hudson Card, Casey Thompson or Maalik Murphy is paramount to his ultimate success. The smart money is that the light switch flicks on for someone in 2022 more than 21.



(Sell) I think people are just reacting. Losing Banks is a really big deal for 2022 recruiting. I haven't sensed anything close to a meltdown.





(Sell) The media covering this recruitment in the state of Texas just miscalculated the situation. That includes us. Texas wasn't a leader when we listed him as such in the War Room or when I said as much last week in this very column. A lot of that came from a massive amount of confidence that existed inside the football program. They were not ready for this set of events. Consider it a lesson learned.



(Sell) Texas needs to get to 10 wins in December so that the recruits in April are still paying attention when the Draft rolls around.



(Sell) I might be answering this wrong, but I get the sense that the need for Texas and Oklahoma isn't quite as large as it once was. Don't get me wrong, it could still happen, but A&M raising a stink about it would mean testing the loyalty of some in the league. I think A&M would have some support. How much? Great question.



(Sell) It's been a long 10 years. There's room for all kinds of meltdowns.



(Buy) We're not far away from the 1980s level of wild, wild west stuff that landed almost the entire SWC on probation.



(Sell) I don't believe he signs with Oregon.



(Buy) This had to have been an eye-opening situation, as the Texas staff was seemingly the last to know.



(Sell) I refuse to believe the football program can't get out of the rut. In Hudson Card, I trust.



(Sell) I am not projecting that.




(Sell) You'd be amazed at how well this city would sell with a winner instead of a loser.



(Sell) I don't sense they plan on saving much for the Portal.



(Buy) I love the dude, but I am excited about what we might have cooking in terms of additions.

No. 8 - Scattershooting on the sports weekend...

... Once upon a time, I'd have been over the moon about the Cowboys being on Hard Knocks. I'm not sure how to feel in 2021.

... Suns in 5.

... I'm really not happy that the Sixers pissed away a season that should have ended with Joel Embiid lifting the Finals MVP trophy. The door was open, and Ben Simmons was afraid to go through it.

... That was weak stuff from Patrick Beverley at the end of game six against the Suns. Straight-up punk move.

... Is Luka such a bad teammate in Dallas that no one will want to play with him? When did that become a thing?

... It really sucks being a Phillies fan these days. I wonder how I would feel if I was just rooting for Shohei Ohtani every night?

... Yes, I have noticed that Tampa Bay is putting a hurting on Montreal in the Stanley Cup Finals. I haven't watched any of it, but I have noticed.

... Looking like England and Italy in the Final of the EUROs next weekend. Feels like a coin-toss, which means England will lose in penalty-kicks, right?

No. 9 - Top 10 Most Patriotic Movies Of All-Time ...

This is probably as subjective as it gets, but here goes.

10. Top Gun
9. Red Dawn
8. Miracle
7. The Tuskegee Airmen
6. Patton
5. Independence Day
4. Rocky IV
3. Casablanca
2. Saving Private Ryan
1. Mr. Smith Goes to Washington

No. 10 - And Finally ...

I totally get the underlying premise of Texas needing to prove it on the field to start winning these battles for the bluest of blues, but what has Oregon done to get the benefit of the doubt on a recruit like this? This logic seems to fall apart unless we are losing to Alabama or Clemson or maybe maybe even LSU, but Oregon??
 
I have zero concerns. Bogart will deliver.
Casablanca is my ATF movie and I've got Deadpool in my Top Ten so I'm not some classic-movie snob.

But despite my adoration of the movie, I have never viewed it as a patriotic movie. It doesn't exactly scream U-S-A when the lead character got kicked out of America and there isn't a single scene based in America and not a single American soldier. Hell, Rick and Sam are the only two characters from America.

Its greatness is the story and Bogart's and Bergman's roles. I don't get patriotism from it at all.

But then again Deadpool is in my Top Ten so how smart can I really be?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archstradamus
I totally get the underlying premise of Texas needing to prove it on the field to start winning these battles for the bluest of blues, but what has Oregon done to get the benefit of the doubt on a recruit like this? This logic seems to fall apart unless we are losing to Alabama or Clemson or maybe maybe even LSU, but Oregon??
Oregon is a national program that has played in the national title game twice since Texas was last in it, It has won 5 conference titles since Texas last won one.
 
Casablanca is my ATF movie and I've got Deadpool in my Top Ten so I'm not some classic-movie snob.

But despite my adoration of the movie, I have never viewed it as a patriotic movie. It doesn't exactly scream U-S-A when the lead character got kicked out of America and there isn't a single scene based in America and not a single American soldier. Hell, Rick and Sam are the only two characters from America.

Its greatness is the story and Bogart's and Bergman's roles. I don't get patriotism from it at all.

But then again Deadpool is in my Top Ten so how smart can I really be?

You have to remember that this movie freaking came out before Pearl Harbor.

Everything that Bogart did in the final act of the movie and all that he gave up was soaking in patriotism.

I saw this online when I did a search just now. I figured someone else would explain it better than I.


"Okay, Rick isn’t technically fighting as an American. But really, he is.

Rick Blaine has been disillusioned by America, maybe even thrown out of America. He’s set up 3,700 miles away, well-off, well-liked, out of the line of fire. By the end of the movie it looks like he can even get the girl.

He renounces all that for the uncertain and often short life of a resistance fighter. The fact it’s the French resistance is irrelevant. By late 1942, Rick Blaine knows what the rest of the world knows: that America and free Europe are now a single team, embodying the hope and ideal, however flawed, of human freedom. It’s not coincidence that everyone who has enough money in Casablanca wants to use it to get to America.

Rick doesn’t have to join the fight, except he really does. No movie has made that simple definition of patriotism any clearer."
 
  • Like
Reactions: txfight
ADVERTISEMENT