Look just like I thought the favorites all won Saturday. But here's the catch. I've said all along about how this committee is dominated by the Big X and the SEC. And that the most influential members Barry Alvarez of WI, and Jeff Long, of AR, are a couple of weasels. So what happens I thought that MSU would end up fourth and everything else in the top 4 would stay the same.
Wrong
They moved MSU to number three and Oklahoma down to number 4. What does this mean? Well it means its number two vs number three Bama vs MSU. What it really means is with this matchup is that it's GUARANTEED that someone from the SEC out Big X will be in the title game giving the committee the best possible chance to gloat about how they were right all along. This was not an accident with this bunch.
And since I'm typing from a tablet I would like someone to read the article about how the Big X slowed an amendment by the Big XII regarding conf championship deregulation. Read it and remind yourself why our chairman Bob Bowlsby is such a wimp. As I've said before our lone rep is TT ad Kirby Holcutt and he's a political lightweight.
I'm also po'd about some of our bowl match ups. Trying to understand these tie breakers as to who goes to which bowls is more confusing than trying to understand how to pass the test to sell insurance. And OSU was clearly the worst of the November 4. They were 10-0 ranked sixth and had both games at home. They were beaten like a red headed step child in both games. Look I remember how Baylor and Oklahoma finished. But imo, TCU got the raw end of the deal. They should be in NO to play Ole Miss, Baylor should be in SA, and OSU should be in Orlando. And like everyone else I know that when it became apparent that TT was going to the Houston Bowl the SEC arranged for the worst possible matchup for TT. Ditto for KSU/AR. Now for me this is the most personal. One because of Jeff Long. The second is because after what Bret Bielema said about hs fb and coaches in TX I hope the sob never wins another game.
Finally I remember when the SB would have never taken a matchup like they have with Ole Miss/OSU this year.
Wrong
They moved MSU to number three and Oklahoma down to number 4. What does this mean? Well it means its number two vs number three Bama vs MSU. What it really means is with this matchup is that it's GUARANTEED that someone from the SEC out Big X will be in the title game giving the committee the best possible chance to gloat about how they were right all along. This was not an accident with this bunch.
And since I'm typing from a tablet I would like someone to read the article about how the Big X slowed an amendment by the Big XII regarding conf championship deregulation. Read it and remind yourself why our chairman Bob Bowlsby is such a wimp. As I've said before our lone rep is TT ad Kirby Holcutt and he's a political lightweight.
I'm also po'd about some of our bowl match ups. Trying to understand these tie breakers as to who goes to which bowls is more confusing than trying to understand how to pass the test to sell insurance. And OSU was clearly the worst of the November 4. They were 10-0 ranked sixth and had both games at home. They were beaten like a red headed step child in both games. Look I remember how Baylor and Oklahoma finished. But imo, TCU got the raw end of the deal. They should be in NO to play Ole Miss, Baylor should be in SA, and OSU should be in Orlando. And like everyone else I know that when it became apparent that TT was going to the Houston Bowl the SEC arranged for the worst possible matchup for TT. Ditto for KSU/AR. Now for me this is the most personal. One because of Jeff Long. The second is because after what Bret Bielema said about hs fb and coaches in TX I hope the sob never wins another game.
Finally I remember when the SB would have never taken a matchup like they have with Ole Miss/OSU this year.
Last edited:
