I don't really understand how the decision making process is to take out a starter and sub in a freshman or backup. I am not bashing Herman or the coordinators, but I think it is a legitimate point. Last year was last year and I just attributed it to finding players that really wanted it and seeing which players gelled. Of course this is barring injury on the field. If Brandon Jones won his position last year, this spring and in fall camp, why take him out and put a freshman in? There are so many factors that go into making a mistake and many times it is another team members fault as well. I can't get into who is in the secondary because we have somebody different every play it seems. Same goes for our running backs. Just leave Watson and Young in. It isn't necessary to bring in Porter or Ingram. Why must they put in a different running back each play. I don't see any other teams, college or pro, doing this. I believe it can be good on occasion if you have two even players and you want to see who emerges, but, I think overall, the way Herman/coaches are currently doing it is more harmful than good. If somebody wins there position outright, they aren't perfect and will have an off play. They can't be expected to play loose when this strategy is used excessively, instead they play insecure or not to F up. Just a rant in a sh*tty Saturday thus far.