The Feds play this weird word game when determining motive for a jihadist attack. They can have evidence that the individual associated with the bombings is a Muslim, who is a refugee from a predominantly Muslim country, has obvious associations with individuals and groups of radical jihadists through social media etc.., and has the appearance (long beard) of a practicing Muslim.
Even with all this evidence they still say they can not determine a motive for the attack. Excuse me? What more evidence do you need as to the motivations of the individual? The motivation is staring you in the face.
Even with all this evidence they still say they can not determine a motive for the attack. Excuse me? What more evidence do you need as to the motivations of the individual? The motivation is staring you in the face.
