I just answered your question. And the dismissive ‘perception is reality, right?” probably wasn’t needed. Just offered an opinion. And nobody is realistically wanting Diaz over Altuve daily at 2nd. Altuve could just as easily go 12-25 next week.
I WOULD like some sort of set lineup that didn’t include Straw at lead off. 7/8/9 are set. Find a workable order for the top 6 and roll with it.
Yeah. Diaz is swinging the bat well. Put him at 2nd. He deserves some more at bats. I sure hope this is not a sharp declining Altuve. He came out great to start the season.
Somebody does.
As for my perception is reality statement, I mean that Correa has hit leadoff what, 2 games that we won, and suddenly he's the answer at leadoff? No, I don't get that at all, sorry if that sounds dismissive. Just because I disagree with you and try to describe why, I'm being dismissive? No, I'm not. Being dismissive would be me simply saying you're wrong and I'm right and moving on. I didn't do that, I stated my case. That's the farthest thing from dismissive I could have done. I'm sure you know that to be dismissive means to act as or show that something is unworthy of consideration.
If you want to run with I'm just wrong, or Altuve's washed up, or Altuve just needs a break from leadoff, or whatever, that's fine with me. My only real point is we don't have a worthy leadoff candidate long term and I think we would be better off long term if Altuve were left at leadoff and allowed to work through this. In other words, given the Springer treatment.
We could move Correa back to leadoff. I don't think that is a long term solution, especially considering we could very well be trading him at some point and it is seeming like longer and longer odds he's back next season, but we could do that.
I just don't buy the argument we're losing because Altuve is slumping at leadoff. That's not why we're losing. We're losing because our pitchers are not attacking hitters and are giving up too many free bases, we're making bad defensive plays at critical points in games, and we're not getting "timely" hits, and because we have 2 glaring holes in our lineup representing 2/3's of our outfield that was anticipated but not addressed by our management and ownership before this season started. I do give them credit for bringing Brantley back though. Imagine how bad it could have been
Yeah, we've run into a couple of really bad umpires too, but moving Altuve doesn't fix that either.
Altuve is a streaky hitter. He's going to snap out of this, but if he doesn't that may be that one hole too many in our lineup that we just can't overcome, wherever he hits in our lineup.
FWIW, Correa's OBP is only .315. That hardly screams leadoff hitter. If we're going by stats, the best candidates are Gurriel (OBP .418), Brantley (.355), Bregman (.350) and Alvarez (.361). Those are your only real candidates based on OBP if you want somebody hitting leadoff that even approaches an OBP of .350.
I would ask again who everyone really wants at leadoff, but I get it now. Anyone but Altuve. Until our pitchers start attacking hitters, we start playing better defense, and we get some more timely hitting throughout our lineup it's not going to matter who hits leadoff though.
Today is another day though. We need this win. We knew this was going to be a tough series. We just haven't played good mental baseball the last 2 games. Doing that today would be a start. If I were Dusty Baker that would be my message to the team today. Can we play a mentally error free game today?