ISU Defense
The Cyclone defense is a base quarters defense. They are ‘multiple’ up front and like most Big 12 defenses, play a lot of nickel personnel. However, they can match-up with 4-3 personnel if needed.
The Cyclone safeties, especially the boundary safety often have run support responsibility. They will align 2-high on most downs. This yields initiative to the Texas run game. Where the ISU defensive backs are lacking some is in stature. The hope is, the Texas receivers can block well against this unit.
It will take a physical effort by the [Texas] offensive line and receivers alike. ISU likes to take away interior gaps and spill runs outside where the linebackers and safeties lie in wait.
The Cyclones slant the D-line, often away from the back’s alignment. This quickly fills gaps diagonal of the back’s alignment. Look for Texas to utilize what I call ‘same side’ runs, where the back takes a path vertical or out to the same side of his alignment (think zone). Also, ISU’s D-line, when they do play ‘straight-up’ tend to respond quickly to down blocks. This will help the Longhorns, as Counter and Power both utilize down blocks opposite the path of the puller.
ISU mixes coverages similar to OU, but with a heavier reliance on Cover 2. I’m really curious to see if ISU plays Texas similar to the way they played Baylor, a game they mostly led. If so, ISU will scheme the pass more while walking the tight rope up front, trying to see just how long they can contain the run game with an honest front and secondary support (remember, weak safety). If they do decide to drop a safety in the box, expect the quick passing game to open up, especially the man-beating concepts run last week.
ISU Offense
The ISU offense is what I refer to as a multiple spread offense. They often deploy two tight ends, use shifts and motion to diagnose, add or remove gaps, and force defenses to adjust on the fly after receiving a call. They employ read-option, RPOs, and the quarterback run game. Oh, and QB Joel Lanning is back, along with a lanky teammate he splits time with, Jacob Park. It’s clear that Campbell and the offensive staff works hard to scheme against defenses. They bring a little something new each week. To put it simply, the ISU offense will very likely cause problems for the Texas defense.
ISU specializes in zone blocking and they do it well, especially the right side of the line. As a change-up they also utilize a ‘Center Power’ scheme, as well as a Power Sweep scheme. Within all of those, they can also utilize tight end or H-back arc and lead blockers. The icing on the cake to all of this, Joel Lanning, a big guy himself, will also carry the ball as an intended runner and in the read game.
When ISU opts for two tight ends, expect Texas to bring on an extra linebacker. The Texas front will need to be sturdy and the linebackers will need to work quickly, as the ISU run game will release offensive linemen to the 2nd level in a hurry.
The ISU ‘X’ and ‘M’ receivers can play. You may recall Lazard, a big-bodied receiver giving Texas some trouble last season. Ryen on the other hand isn’t big, but he’s quick and manages to consistently get open.
ISU’s offense does change as the quarterback changes. Lanning’s presence allows for a more physical approach up front, while Park seems to be more of a natural passer and a player who’s strangely hard to take down in the backfield.
I think we see a spirited dogfight in DKR this weekend. Texas must match ISU physically and be the faster team.
ISU is not to be taken lightly. They are a very solid football team, despite their record.
[More @ TFB]