Mayfield denied extra year.
- Thread starter madcow12
- Start date
- Status
The Big 12 is looking bad in bowl games. We have a Baylor win and blow out losses. Sports Center was ragging on the Big 12 this morning. They say the Big 12 is not an elite conference and our top 4 teams had weak OOC schedules.
Can't say I disagree with ESPN. After watching Tech, OSU last night, OU, it appears the Big 12 was out athleted imo.
True that its been a rough bowl season for the Big 12. The sec chest thumping commentators do one good thing for my New Year's resolutions.....makes me wanta vomit when they speak like that. Helps me lose weight.
This is dumb. So was OU outathleted by Texas?
OU wasn't outathleted, they were outplayed and outcoached.
OSU was always overrated. They won what they won, but weren't as good as their record. A few of those games they should have lost.
And TT is Tech. They are what they are. They are always outathleted. In just about every game. When they win, it is an offensive shootout and they have the ball last. A blind squirrel could have told you LSU has a stronger and deeper team than Tech ever has and ever will.
The truth is that the BigXII was the 2nd deepest conference this year. Behind the Pac12. That is widely the accepted notion. OU getting blasted by UT doesn't mean they were outathleted by UT. And Clemson just took that blueprint and copied it. The mirror image of that stats in that game is shockingly similar.
This is your second dumbest post of the two previous years. The first when you said Mayfield was afraid of completion, has a terrible arm and was an all around punk and a terrible QB. JSTO you are a complete idiot and your Mayfield proclamation made Stampede look like a Rhodes Scholar.
Uh I know you quit watching your team right after the RRS win, and I don't blame you either , but apparently you didn't see OU. Play another game either. OU got stronger as the year went on and were playing their best ball at the end of the year. Clemsons Olineand Dline pummeled OU's respective lines. Ran right over OU. Locked down Shepard for the most part. Clemson out athletes OU plain and simple. Not sure what game you watched. Out best DT was out and you could tell. Their best DL was out and you couldn't tell could you? If you want to see an example of a team being out schemed then go watch the OU vs Alabama game. Alabama wasn't out athleted in that game. You are wrong in your assessment and if you can't see the gap in talent I don't know what to tell you but coming from the guy who picked Hansen to start for OU this year it doesn't surprise me.
It's easy to look good against teams (Baylor, TCU and OSU) without their starting QBs. OU snuck into that game and didn't belong on the field with Clemson.
Why in the world to you always change the subject?
And more importantly why do you change it to stuff that is pure BS and conjecture and personal attacks.
I mean I know you hate admitting you are wrong, is the answer as to why. But really I stopped reading your above BS when you started out with "uh i know you quit watching UT after RRS win....." because right off the bat you started with some made up BS and a personal attack.
Seriously, why can't you have a normal point/counterpoint talk....EVER?
And you need to go back and read that. The stuff about Hansen was all about him transferring and I was complimenting the kid saying that back when he was recruited, I thought he would be a good fit. And if he would have stayed, I thought he was a better option than Bell or Knight.
It really is a waste of time reading anything you type.
You have make believe conversations with yourself and have to constantly change the topic. You argued I didn't say things about Baker. I pointed out that I did AND then showed where you consistently trolled it.
And now you want to shift to other BS that you are making up. Back on the ignore list you go, where you belonged all along. Have fun playing at the little kids table. Most of the grown ups already ignore you.
You have make believe conversations with yourself and have to constantly change the topic. You argued I didn't say things about Baker. I pointed out that I did AND then showed where you consistently trolled it.
And now you want to shift to other BS that you are making up. Back on the ignore list you go, where you belonged all along. Have fun playing at the little kids table. Most of the grown ups already ignore you.
OU won fair and square and absolutely deserved to be on the field with Clemson. OU played tge team presented to them.
Oh you said some things about Mayfield okay but you couldn't have been more wrong and your unwillingness to admit that is absolutely hysterical. You want to move the goalposts and try to redefine what 'big game' means because according to you he didn't win any big games. But there is a huge problem in your endeavor to deem Mayfield a bad qb, he was VOTED No. 4 in the Heisman. Do you realize how that really invalidates your obtuse opinion? I don't think you are capable of making that connection. Carry on its quite entertaining to say the least.
I said ou didn't belong. You weren't good enough to make it competitive. Yes, you luckily reached the game fairly, but you weren't in their class was my point.
- Status
