People in California gotta make up their minds as to what is the most important: spending on green energy initiatives or spending on fire prevention and fire fighting.
Wasn't a major issue that they allowed PG&E to become a monopoly AND regulate themselves? Now they have terrible power infrastructure that is downed in high winds and starts these wild fires?
Going from coal to green energy has zero result on if a power line is attached to a rotting pole with brush all around it.
I believe his line about "power infrastructure that is downed in high winds that started these wild fires"WTF does that have to do with Cali Wildfire....?
Let them regulate themselves. Always a great idea.WTF does that have to do with Cali Wildfire....?
I believe his line about "power infrastructure that is downed in high winds that started these wild fires"
I just have trouble mustering up sympathy for amazingly stupid people.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/464706-pge-may-shut-off-power-in-large-portions-of-california-this-week-to?amp
PG&E is being forced to spend millions per year on green energy that yields what in comparison to fossil fuels, etc. Rather than regulate PG&E into spending millions per year on green energy, that money could be better spent elsewhere...like fire prevention. That’s California for you.
Too big to fail sound familiar? That’s PG&E and they know it. Plenty of blame to go around, including PG&E and the California government.Help me out here. I'm reading this article and what I see is PG&E entered into several long term contracts where they bought renewable energy at much more expensive rates than what is currently being provided. Were they forced to buy all of these contracts by the government? Were they forced to buy several long term contracts with an uncertain future in renewables or did they decide to buy big and in bulk to save money?
It sounds like a bad business decision by a monopoly that is now asking to be bailed out by claiming bankruptcy and absolving themselves of their contracts? They want to walk away from those contracts and leave the providers holding the bag.
Uh---- ya think?Help me out here. I'm reading this article and what I see is PG&E entered into several long term contracts where they bought renewable energy at much more expensive rates than what is currently being provided. Were they forced to buy all of these contracts by the government? Were they forced to buy several long term contracts with an uncertain future in renewables or did they decide to buy big and in bulk to save money?
It sounds like a bad business decision by a monopoly that is now asking to be bailed out by claiming bankruptcy and absolving themselves of their contracts? They want to walk away from those contracts and leave the providers holding the bag.
Uh---- ya think?
This is what happens when you virtue signal before you know what you're talking about. California got WAY out over their skis on this one and guess what?
We are going to be the ones that ultimately have to bail them out.
BTW--- where the hell is outtherincali?
I'm honestly worried about the dude now. @LonghornMM can you email him and check on him?
Too big to fail sound familiar? That’s PG&E and they know it. Plenty of blame to go around, including PG&E and the California government.
I think you just said what I said but at a 45 degree angle instead of my 90 degree angle.lol wut? you're defending the company for making bad bets because you want to blame the state for pushing renewables. but nobody made them go all in on long term contracts.
it's like if shell bought a bunch of wells when it was $100/barrel and then ask the taxpayers to bail them out because now it's not feasible to keep up with their profits. so they ignore maintaining pipelines to cut corners and try to declare bankruptcy.
okay...maybe i misunderstood but your first post seemed to clearly lay blame on california for the issue? PG&E is a bad actor here.
I think you just said what I said but at a 45 degree angle instead of my 90 degree angle.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckd...ve-been-mitigated-by-prevention/#508573c1341b
Both PG&E and the California government are equally at fault.
BTW--- where the hell is outtherincali?
I'm honestly worried about the dude now. @LonghornMM can you email him and check on him?
Damn Libs and their save every animal on earth campaign along with not getting rid of brush and dead trees are what is causing these mass wildfires. I really don't see how anyone could live in Cali. That place is an s***hole full of doodoo, needles, wildfires and potheads. You can thank the likes of Stretch Pelosi, Adam Shitt and Chode Newsom……….
Depends. Do you live in La Jolla on the cliffs like my aunt and uncle? Then your property is worth a crap ton. Do you live in a trailer park in the desert east of Joshua tree? Then your property is worth about the same as a trailer park in Oklahoma.Lol you sound balanced.
How does property value in California compare to Oklahoma again?
Lol you sound balanced.
How does property value in California compare to Oklahoma again?
Why do you have to bring up trailer parks? What did they ever do to you?Depends. Do you live in La Jolla on the cliffs like my aunt and uncle? Then your property is worth a crap ton. Do you live in a trailer park in the desert east of Joshua tree? Then your property is worth about the same as a trailer park in Oklahoma.
However, if your trailer park in Oklahoma has OIL beneath it, then your property is worth more than any piece of land in Beverly Hills, Belaire, or any other posh part of Cali.
So to answer your question, it depends.
Stop dude. Or I'm going to come swim in your pool again.Why do you have to bring up trailer parks? What did they ever do to you?
Depends. Do you live in La Jolla on the cliffs like my aunt and uncle? Then your property is worth a crap ton. Do you live in a trailer park in the desert east of Joshua tree? Then your property is worth about the same as a trailer park in Oklahoma.
However, if your trailer park in Oklahoma has OIL beneath it, then your property is worth more than any piece of land in Beverly Hills, Belaire, or any other posh part of Cali.
So to answer your question, it depends.
At least living in Oklahoma, you don't have to live amongst liberal whack jobs. So there's that.
I'll take granola over meth heads, thank you very much.
And I'll take almost anything over Oklahoma.