OU Still sux
- Thread starter LongfellowDrew
- Start date
I think the OU fans are accustomed to that term. He is correct defense is bad. He is the 11th leading tackler on the team. Anyway screw all that politacal correctness. I guess they didn’t do that when Bozworth played. Oh yes we were in different conferences then. It was a lot better rival rival game then.
I like it for obvious reasons but rules are rules. If they're gonna tag players doing the horns down, they need to tag him for saying OU sucks to a reporter.
On the other hand, what kind of response were they expecting when asking the opinion of the primary rival? Hook, line, & sinker.....he took the bait. Hager, use it as motivation.
On the other hand, what kind of response were they expecting when asking the opinion of the primary rival? Hook, line, & sinker.....he took the bait. Hager, use it as motivation.
Who cares what he said to a reporter?! He is half right, OU's defense does suck. The kid is having fun (and to be frank, I'm not a fan of his) and I hate forced apologies. They say a hell of a lot worse things to each other on the Field. Plus, if OU happens by some miracle to beat WVU, it gives OU a little bulletin board material (although they really shouldn't need it).
Agree. Teddy Lehman pretty much said the same thing about this yesterday and chastising the Big 12 to retract their ‘demand’ that Hagar have to apologize. He said it’s a rivalry and it all a part of the fun. I agree
Others have said it, but wouldn't it be nice if the Big12 was this quick to issue a reprimand for abusers and sexual predators and schools who house those players?
Every school has or has had those types of players, what's your point? Never mind, everyone knows what your point is...….
No, every school absolutely does not put up with violence against girls. What a crock.
Did I say every school puts up with it? NO! I said every school has or has had those types of players. Which is true at some point their History.
Case in point, Mizzou kicked one to the curb, and OU was gladly lurking under the curb to scoop him up.
Sure but most dismiss them. Some are soulless in search of wins. I believe that was ASU’s point concerning schools that house such scumbags. Such as yours.
Since you asked in such an intentionally obtuse way.
We all agree with Brenda . . . but I prefer players who let their play do all their talking.
Yes, they do dismiss them and they should. I think there should be a much harsher stance across the board on issues regarding abuse, DUIs, DWIs, theft, etc. Question is, do you put that at the NCAA level, Conference level or school level or a mixture. Do you give players a second chance or not? When do they get that second chance if you do? The NFL is littered with those types of players as well so what's the answer?
If a player throws a girl down a flight of stairs or breaks her face, you don’t take them. Pretty simple if you have any sense of morality or ethics. Some things don’t warrant a second chance. This is clear to most.
I would go as far as adding infidelity to the list of offenses you just don't take. It really brings into question their integrity, wouldn't you agree Scholz? Herbstreit should be ashamed.
DWI's as well as you are putting everyone else's lives on the road at risk. I'm sure Henry Melton and Sergio Kindle would agree they got off easy considering they could have easily ruined many people's lives by killing someone's friends and family.
I do like how you regurgitate the same things over and over and over. You definitely have your talking points down!
Ha. Funny. That's a nonviolent issue between a husband and wife and hardly comparable. Of course you'd try to conflate the issues because you can't defend all the wifebeaters your scumbag program has coddled.
Still waiting on the Herbstreit comments I supposedly made that you promised to dig up.
Last edited:
And I like how you immoral people think you can argue away your acceptance of violence against girls with your illogical whataboutisms. It's stomach turning to be honest. As well as makes me face palm at your low intelligence.
And I like how you dodge, bob and weave and only address what you want. It's good to hear you are completely fine with college football players getting drunk and then driving all over town with the chance of killing someone.
As for violence against women, that should be a zero tolerance issue in college athletics as well as at all levels of professional sports. Unfortunately it's not.
They didn't harm anyone, moron. Your MULTIPLE players beat up girls. One kidnapped and threatened to murder one. But they could ball right? Keep making your retarded whataboutisms and deflections if it helps you sleep at night though.
It shouldn't have to be a rule. People should be moral. You people are not.
It shouldn't have to be a rule. People should be moral. You people are not.
Scholz, just for the record, I think people who hit women are scum. Just for the record, what is your stance on people who cheat on their spouses?
Oh, so if I pull a gun on you, shoot at you and miss then that's perfectly okay because I didn't harm anyone? I get it. It's okay to do whatever you want so long as nobody gets harmed...……………….And like I said, violence against women should be ZERO TOLERANCE. I have family that has been sexually abused, so I can do without your holier than thou crap. I've also lost people to drunk driving who wouldn't have died had someone not been on the road driving drunk, but in your mind it would have been perfectly okay for them to drive drunk if they hadn't killed my friend. Gotcha
Ahh, another retarded comparison from Dewey. Shooting a gun at someone intentionally is absolutely not the same thing. Just retarded. So Bob Stoops is a bad guy right? For protecting all of those wifebeaters he had play for him? mkay. Gotcha, chief. I'm sure you made quite the protest when Joe Mixon was playing. If what you say about your family is true, then putting up with these players makes it even worse for you. NOBODY in your fanbase or administration made a stink AT ALL.
And, bell, I think spouses who cheat are liars to their partners (open marriages aside). I think they probably shouldn't have gotten married. But that's between them. Again, hardly the same as abusing someone of the weaker sex. Keep making that comparison though. It makes you look moral and honest.
And, bell, I think spouses who cheat are liars to their partners (open marriages aside). I think they probably shouldn't have gotten married. But that's between them. Again, hardly the same as abusing someone of the weaker sex. Keep making that comparison though. It makes you look moral and honest.
I'm waiting on my comments about Herbstreit that you promised days ago.
Waiting. Crickets. Chirp. Chirp...
No Scholz, they have no integrity whatsoever and are very dishonest people. I think that is the phrase you are looking for but can't bring yourself to say it because it upsets your convenient narrative.
Let's see it then. Quit putting words in my mouth, liar.
You're already a proven liar. You said Murray and Ehlinger had a "pleasant exchange" after our game this year. Talk about making up complete BS to fit a false narrative.
I'm definitely putting these words in your mouth because you're too mealy mouthed to say them yourself "No Scholz, they have no integrity whatsoever and are very dishonest people. I think that is the phrase you are looking for but can't bring yourself to say it because it upsets your convenient narrative."
Nice strawman. And deflection. I'm going to make up words that you never said so I can argue against them. Because I can't defend my scumbag program and fanbase.
Liar. You would know about a complete lack of integrity or honesty. Tell us again how poor brown people without shoes are the devil invading our country, POS human being. And then make up some dumbass comment about what "church I go to". You wouldn't know Jesus if he were standing right in front of you.
Liar. You would know about a complete lack of integrity or honesty. Tell us again how poor brown people without shoes are the devil invading our country, POS human being. And then make up some dumbass comment about what "church I go to". You wouldn't know Jesus if he were standing right in front of you.
Scholz just above in your post, you act like it's ok to cheat on your spouse because it's "private" Chucklz. No, and ANYONE that does it is considered to have no credibility, no integrity and are very dishonest. You fail to acknowledge that for some reason....why is that?
Similar threads
