Stanford vs Washington
- Thread starter clob94
- Start date
I'm not all that schocked. UCLA outplayed Stanford imo. Let them hang around and eventually gave it away. Washington is legit. If Texas is looking next year Peterson would be near the top. Wasn't there reports he wanted it?
I don't think there have ever been reports of Petersen to Texas even when he was at Boise. I personally was hoping for it at the time. Petersen is a Northwest man and will more than likely stay put. UCLA wanted him among others but, he wouldn't even leave Boise for that. UW was a good fit for family reasons, I think.
Yeah I mean I don't think there is any reason for him to leave unless he wants to. You can do big things at UW. Especially with USC floundering around.
Correct me if I'm wrong-- isn't this Peterson's second year at UW?
Freaking UW is ranked in the top 10 after 2 years under a new coach. Must be nice.
Freaking UW is ranked in the top 10 after 2 years under a new coach. Must be nice.
Washington recruiting classes the last 2 yrs, 28 and 29th.
We were 9 and 10 !
Coaching matters !
We were 9 and 10 !
Coaching matters !
I don't know Spur. I think the PAC has been decent. Oregon, ASU, UCLA, Stanford and Utah all doing decent last few years
Washington has ZERO freshmen starters and I believe most of the 5 or 6 sophomores on O and D are Redshirts/3 years.
They were 7-6 last season
Wash '16 OL-3 upperclassmen. UTs projected '17 OL-3 upperclassnen. Wash '16 QB-soph. UT '17 QB-soph. Wash '16 def-8 Jr/sr. UT '16 def-8+
Washington moves to 5-0 for the first time in 24 years!
Washington won a top-10 matchup for the first time since beating Michigan in the Rose Bowl 25 years ago
They were 7-6 last season
Wash '16 OL-3 upperclassmen. UTs projected '17 OL-3 upperclassnen. Wash '16 QB-soph. UT '17 QB-soph. Wash '16 def-8 Jr/sr. UT '16 def-8+
Washington moves to 5-0 for the first time in 24 years!
Washington won a top-10 matchup for the first time since beating Michigan in the Rose Bowl 25 years ago
Last edited:
I would like to remind all of you that it's still the University of Washington........
I guess that's the different culture OUinCali was referring to above. Pesky facts, always getting in the way. The bottom line is...Peterson is a good coach and had his physically less talented squad ready to kick some butt. Coaching
You guys have to look at UW. They haven't played anyone. All Stanford do is relying on McCaffrey. He is good but it just him. Their QB is blah. WR's dropped a lot of balls. Their OL gave up 8 plus sacks. Their D is ok but they couldn't hang with the speed of UW at all. UW was prepared and pumped for the Tree Kings. I expect Stanford to get another L or 2. UW will get a L as well.
Seriously? Pac is better than the Big12, so that point doesn't matter, besides didn't we just lose to a Pac team?
Recruiting matters most when you have two equally matched coaches, not when you have one coach that can't get a coin toss correct and one that has a reputation of beating blueblood programs with teams that have far less talent.
I love Chris Peterson but dude was never coming to Texas when we were looking for a coach. It was too big a move, he had his daughter to think about and as i understand it, special concessions were made that they could bring her doctor up or bring her down to him. I don't remember the circumstances but it was a convenient setup made mostly through proximity.
Similar threads
