There's no question both Trump and Hillary come with some scandal baggage. It was interesting in the debate last night how each of them handled it when pressed by the moderator.
Hillary went with the classic dodge approach like this with about the same result:
Whereas Trump went with the classic denial no matter what approach with his "nobody respects women more than me" line that went off about like this:
So which is the better aproach for dealing with scandals?
Do like Hillary and completely dodge the question and refuse to address it all by instead spouting off about Russia hacking us when asked about email leaks, or how great the Clinton Foundation is when asked about pay to play?
Or is it better to take the Trump approach and deny deny deny in the face of overwhelming evidence like saying all the women are lying (which is pretty hard to believe), and then follow it up with the "nobody respects women more than me" line which is impossible to believe and is such total and utter BS that it drew an audible chuckle from the live audience when he said it?
Hillary went with the classic dodge approach like this with about the same result:
Whereas Trump went with the classic denial no matter what approach with his "nobody respects women more than me" line that went off about like this:
So which is the better aproach for dealing with scandals?
Do like Hillary and completely dodge the question and refuse to address it all by instead spouting off about Russia hacking us when asked about email leaks, or how great the Clinton Foundation is when asked about pay to play?
Or is it better to take the Trump approach and deny deny deny in the face of overwhelming evidence like saying all the women are lying (which is pretty hard to believe), and then follow it up with the "nobody respects women more than me" line which is impossible to believe and is such total and utter BS that it drew an audible chuckle from the live audience when he said it?
