Jones doing a media story on boosters pressuring Sark on playing players based on race? Sounds absurd. Hopefully, it's fake news and if so, someone should be liable for trying to stir the pot.
All i know is that they could of had Saban in 13, But as he told Finebaum i didnt want to answer to 30 people. If they are stupid enough to fire Sark before 4 years they deserve everything they get which is to be a mediocre team. Texas will no longer attract good football coaches. These kid that are juniors and seniors have gone through 2 head coaches and what at least 4 coordinators, and we are wondering why they are inconsistent?Jones doing a media story on boosters pressuring Sark on playing players based on race? Sounds absurd. Hopefully, it's fake news and if so, someone should be liable for trying to stir the pot.
The only thing wrong with giving Sark a few years of lead rope is the fact that we don't know if he is a good head coach or not. If we had Saban, Urban, Dabo, or someone like that with skins on the wall, I would have no pause giving a long contract and letting them build for at least 5 years. Sark does not have that confindence from people because he has never been successful as a head coach. Do you let him work and take a chance of digging the hole deeper or do you pull the plug after 2 or 3 years. That is the million dollar question, how much do you trust Sark to get it done? I think we will know the answer after next year. Either there will be improvement or there won't.All i know is that they could of had Saban in 13, But as he told Finebaum i didnt want to answer to 30 people. If they are stupid enough to fire Sark before 4 years they deserve everything they get which is to be a mediocre team. Texas will no longer attract good football coaches. These kid that are juniors and seniors have gone through 2 head coaches and what at least 4 coordinators, and we are wondering why they are inconsistent?
If skins on the wall are what matter, then why hire Sark in the first place? Either you believed in the coach's culture and philosophy and will give him the time to implement it, or you really don't believe in him, and no matter how much time he gets, it won't matter.The only thing wrong with giving Sark a few years of lead rope is the fact that we don't know if he is a good head coach or not. If we had Saban, Urban, Dabo, or someone like that with skins on the wall, I would have no pause giving a long contract and letting them build for at least 5 years. Sark does not have that confindence from people because he has never been successful as a head coach. Do you let him work and take a chance of digging the hole deeper or do you pull the plug after 2 or 3 years. That is the million dollar question, how much do you trust Sark to get it done? I think we will know the answer after next year. Either there will be improvement or there won't.
Just saying it matters. They shot for the moon and missed on Urban and it was very public. They couldn't at that point go back and say they have faith in Herman and keep him. Sark was an option who was left and they gambled on him because at that point they had to do something. We'll see what he does to fix the issues this offseason and see if there is any improvement next year. I'm not calling for him to be fired yet.If skins on the wall are what matter, then why hire Sark in the first place? Either you believed in the coach's culture and philosophy and will give him the time to implement it, or you really don't believe in him, and no matter how much time he gets, it won't matter.
Wut? Not sure I understand the argument. So, CDC and the admin didn’t know if he was a good HC when they hired him? On that basis, hire me at 6 million with a nice buyout. Not sure if I’d be a good HC. The admin signed him to a multi year contract. Let him do his job.The only thing wrong with giving Sark a few years of lead rope is the fact that we don't know if he is a good head coach or not. If we had Saban, Urban, Dabo, or someone like that with skins on the wall, I would have no pause giving a long contract and letting them build for at least 5 years. Sark does not have that confindence from people because he has never been successful as a head coach.
I meant it as exactly as I said it. No one knows if he is a good head coach because he hasn't won anything yet. I think most people's criteria for a good head coach is to win something, and he hasn't proven to be good yet.Wut? Not sure I understand the argument. So, CDC and the admin didn’t know if he was a good HC when they hired him? On that basis, hire me at 6 million with a nice buyout. Not sure if I’d be a good HC. The admin signed him to a multi year contract. Let him do his job.
This is the left's favorite tactic. Throw out a crazy, unsubstantiated rumor, and then jump to the worst conclusion possible "if this is true." Inside sources say Trump was in contact with Russia ... Trump had prostitutes in Moscow...Insiders were contemplating invoking the 26th amendment ... Trump paid Stormy Daniels ... "If this is true...."I know one thing if this is true then our bmd are out of control and they're running the team. And if this is true then Hartzell and Del Conte need to grow some balls and finally set some boundaries.