EdSimmonsPants said:

I've been a Cowboy fan since I was 12 (51 years). I have watched exactly zero minutes of any Cowboys game this season.

Click to expand...

BOLIO said:

A example of stars not having anything to do with INDIVIDUAL success. As a group, yes, absolutely but as to the individual player, nope. The young man can play.

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

Jmonstermont said:

It’s hard to trust a guy that keeps putting the ball on the ground. Blue did it again Saturday. He is dynamic, no doubt. Just hard to trust.

Click to expand...

McGuapo said:

I just think Arch does the things that Sarks offense really loves at a level higher than Q and he’s more mobile (I think his overall ceiling is higher too), even though a mobile QB is not really a Sark thing, it’s damn nice to have to get the yards however you can to bail out bad plays. I would bet Arch’s ratings next year are higher than Qs this year even with a rebuilt OL. That said, Sark is in a tough spot for various reasons and he does have an affinity for Quinn that I understand. I just think Arch was made for Sarks offense.

Click to expand...

Ketchum said:

The dynamics are complicated, but yes. I think the better player is not playing.

Click to expand...

Ketchum said:

Wildly different is wildly different.

I can intellectually understand the thinking with going with Ewers. I disagree with him on what is probably slight margins. It's just that those slim margins sometimes end up mattering a lot in important moments.

Click to expand...

Bevo 24 said:

You are an idoit. Have you not seen the QB’s drafted lately? Anthony Richardson went 1st round and he didn’t do shit compared to Quinn. The list goes on and on. Undersized? Lmao.

Click to expand...

Zorlac said:

He wasn’t sitting Brooks and made the change.

It’s what you’re saying he won’t do now.

Click to expand...