I don't really put much thought into where players of my favorite pro teams went to college. You get too much of a mixture that it's pointless to worry about. I know he's gotten into some twitter fights with sooner players, but I didn't realize that Oklahoma residents take exception to it.
outhereincali,
"I've thought how could KD be playing so lousy in his contact year?"
Here we go again, come on man. Lousy? He finished top 5 in MVP voting, averaged over 28 points a game, while shooting OVER 50%. He grabbed over 8 rebounds and 5 assist a game. I'm starting to think your basketball post, are for shock value.
I never post anything for shock value. I want to bring intelligent debate on topics just like you. If it wasn't for the trolls who try to hijack the threads we'd have that.
That said for all his stats KD has not been a 28 ppg 50% shooter when it mattered, not this year at least. He did come up huge in the Spurs series and I said that. But in the world of professional sports you either do it or you don't. I really want KD to win a trophy although he only played at Texas for one year he's still the greatest bb player in school history so it's only right he win at least one. In the wield of the NBA they pay you more than 15 mil for a reason. If I'm hard on KD it's because I want to see him win at all.
Lol, I can no longer take your basketball post serious. You take a game here and there, and try to make it his norm. Your basketball post are watered down, with no substance to back up what you're saying. When it mattered most was against the Spurs, and he handled up. If you want me to pull up his playoff stats, I can do so. I can also post his stats in the finals. You called him lousy, but your post about him are lousy.
As far as Durant only being at Texas for one year, that's something an ou fan usually feels the need to point out. You know why they never say that about players that stayed at Kentucky, Duke, or UNC for one year...it's because that doesn't matter. He's Texas for life. It's interesting that you called Durant lousy this year, which is asinine, but I've seen you brag on ou football players like Zach Sanchez, as if he was a beast this season. Suspect.
And I have never posted that KD was lousy this season.
"I've thought how could KD be playing so lousy in his contact year"
That's you...you said it in this thread.
Alright then I will correct myself. The GSW have been off the charts this year everyone knows that. I really want KD to take the Thunder to the title and they've played so our the charts and I worry they won't beat them. And did you watch the Warrior/Thunder game on 2/27? If you didn't KD went from hero to goat in less than 60 seconds. People on here who watched the talked about it in this board and we've all said the same thing. Is that clear enough for you?
I'm going to tell it like it is. The NBA is the easiest sport to watch when it comes to either you do or you don't. As to who did it
Tim Duncan check
Kobe check
Shaq check
Dirk check
Lebron check
D Wade check
Players who couldn't have done it on their own but benefited by the players lasted above
David Robinson
Chris Bosh
Pau Gasol
Players who had it what it takes but had a mediocre supporting class
Chris Paul
Steve Nash
Players who never did and players who never will
Karl Malone
James Harden
Dwight Howard
As far as KD and Russ go the jury is still out on them. Fwiw, together they made it to the playoffs five years in a row. Because KD was out most of the year they didn't make it last year. But in those five years in for of them the Thunder lost to the team who went on to take it all. I'll be cheering on every Thunder point in this series, especially KD. Clear enough for you or are you going to continue to focus on one sentence out of an op?
So much wrong with this post, but I pass this time. I'll let you remain in bliss.
Hey I can debate you all night long homeboy you want to call me ignorant, you think your Mr NBA? Back it up and prove it.
Hey I can debate you all night long homeboy you want to call me ignorant, you think your Mr NBA? Back it up and prove it.
Not to get in this pissing contest.....as it is pointless.....since its arguing one mans opinions on players compared to another mans. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
I think what the other poster was alluding to.....and definitely what made me pause about your post.....was the following.
You list David Robinson as never doing it on his own and Tim Duncan in the other category as leading a team on his own even though he had David Robinson and then others later in his career. Guessing you give him credit for those teams.
But what is really puzzling is putting Wade in the by himself category. He only had Shaq, not that the big fella matters at all or anything. And then he had LeBron. And you also put LeBron in that alone category....when he had Wade AND Bosh. But you put Bosh in the can't do it alone category. So apparently he doesn't get credit for the titles he won with Wade/LeBron....but Wade/LeBron do get credit for doing it alone (when they were clearly a big3). Just the start of what was puzzling.
You should have tossed Olajuwon on the alone category. Clyde Drexler on couldn't do it alone. And Charles Barkley on never coulda done it alone. John Stockton belongs next to Karl Malone too. And on and on.
In regards to Hakeem and Clyde, I'm only talking about the current generation
They were both players who led teams their teams to titles. Along with Charles Barkley the only reason they didn't win more was because of Michael Jordan. MJ, along with Bill Russell, were the most dominant players of all time.
In regards to D Wade. In 2006, without LeBron, he led a the Heat to a title over the Mavs. That's why I give him a check.
In regards to Hakeem and Clyde, I'm only talking about the current generation They were both players who led teams their teams to titles..
And yet you name Karl Malone.
And he had freaking Shaq, Alonzo Mourning, and Gary Payton on that team. Even Antoine Walker had a pretty nice year that season.
But sure. Wade did it all on his own. Not like Shaq isn't one of the most dominant big men ever or anything.
I'm sorry, but that whole nonsensical check mark argument is riddled with inconsistencies. No point in arguing with the man who came up with whatever formula it took to get the check marks, though. Sorry for pointing out some of your own madness. Its cool. You are entitled to baffling opinions.
I don't have a dog in the fight here, but to say that Hakeem led his team and Drexler needed Hakeem represents EVERY championship team.No, Hakeem led his teams to titles. Clyde couldn't get one in Portland and had to join Hakeem to get it. So it would seem he'd belong in the "couldn't do it on his own" category. Yet you seem to state otherwise.
I'm just saying. Phewwww
I don't have a dog in the fight here, but to say that Hakeem led his team and Drexler needed Hakeem represents EVERY championship team.
Jordan had Pippen
Magic had Kareem and Worthy
Lebron didn't do it on his own for sure. He had to get Bosh and Wade
Every superstar needs a wing man.
As long as they're 'Murican. Too many f'erners on the Thunder.I don't really put much thought into where players of my favorite pro teams went to college.
Oh I agree. And then some.
I just don't get how one person arbitrarily assigns some guys credit for leading their teams. Others no credit. Some partial credit. And others were in some strange "good enough to win it by themselves, even though they didn't" category.