The current interpretation of the 2nd Amendment seems at odds with support of a militia. Since most military long arms are fully automatic, shouldn't the federal restrictions on them be unconstitutional? On another point one of the classic decisions -- US v Miller -- seems to have a huge factual error -- it relied, if I am reading correctly, on the conclusion that short barreled shotguns are not military weapons. This appears to be just factually incorrect. Shouldn't the federal laws restricting automatic weapons and shotguns be unconstitutional? All you AR15 nuts should be able to have full auto on your weapons.
