A few years ago, I would say this was spot on. Now, I feel it is the opposite and the conservatives are the ones actually being hunted down by the Left. The riots, the police being assassinated with videos of people being happy about it, the big tech censoring conservatives, the Soros backed District Attorneys not prosecuting rioters or letting them go free, the No Bail Policy in NY and Liberal cities, the Dems threatening stacking the Court and statehood for Puerto Rico and DC to control the Senate for eternity, the Dems supporting Socialism, the Dems wanting to get rid of Oil and Gas with their demonic Green New Deal, and of course the media supporting all of the above. I pray for our Country that the Dems back away from Socialism but there are many who think AOC is so cute, hip, and wonderful but are ignorant of the evils of Socialism she preaches.
There will be a Civil War before those things happen. Heck, 6 dudes in Michigan got arrested for plotting to kidnap the Michigan governor and make her stand trial for treason. Frankly I wish they got away with it. However, if they did then it would have been fuel to the liberal fire that the Right is so dangerous.
I'm convinced there is going to be straight up fighting in the streets just like in Ukraine. There will be no battle lines as they will be in every street in every city. Hell is going to rule 2021.
You wish the Michigan Governor had been kidnapped and tried illegally, huh?
Is the penalty for being a liberal death? Seriously asking.
What those clowns did was stupid. We all have different lines of demarcation when it comes to the definition of a "tyrannical government". It says in the declaration of independence this---Don't worry, us Liberals don't have any guns. It will be like shooting fish in a barrel.
You wish the Michigan Governor had been kidnapped and tried illegally, huh? I thought you Cons were all for law and order? I guess not when it's someone you don't like. BTW, do you even know why you don't like her? Did she upset you that much? Do you live in Michigan?
Is the penalty for being a liberal death? Seriously asking.
Actually, the leader of the little kidnapping group was Anti-Trump and has youtube videos about how he hates him.Don't worry, us Liberals don't have any guns. It will be like shooting fish in a barrel.
You wish the Michigan Governor had been kidnapped and tried illegally, huh? I thought you Cons were all for law and order? I guess not when it's someone you don't like. BTW, do you even know why you don't like her? Did she upset you that much? Do you live in Michigan?
Is the penalty for being a liberal death? Seriously asking.
Nothing reeks of legitimacy like backing up your reasoning with an out of date article.I have a whole list of liberals who are treasonous assholes who all need to be hung. The list includes mayors, city councilmen, DAs, Govenors, Senitors, and Congressmen.
How many Elderly people died because Gretchen and other liberal democrats decided to house Covid cases in nursing homes?
Here is an out of date article
2000+ people died in Nursing homes because of Gretchen Whitmer.
Yes, I stand by my statement, as far as I'm concerned she needs to answer for those deaths. Democrats need to answer for everything going on in 2020. Riots, Looting, murders, and especially the murder of elderly in nursing homes.
They don't give a shit about anyone but getting power.
Nothing reeks of legitimacy like backing up your reasoning with an out of date article.
He doesn't get the benefit of the doubt because he knew about COVID well before any governor, and still chose to do nothing while millions were being infected.Their excuse is that is was so early that they didn't have enough information and couldn't have known what was going to happen. Funny how Trump doesn't get the same benefit of the doubt.
He doesn't get the benefit of the doubt because he knew about COVID well before any governor, and still chose to do nothing while millions were being infected.
China knew. But I guess they are off the hook. Right?He doesn't get the benefit of the doubt because he knew about COVID well before any governor, and still chose to do nothing while millions were being infected.
So closing flights to and from China except for American citizens and green card holders to come home-- very early in the process-- and then being called racist and xenophobic for it by the media and Trump haters issssssssssss what exactly?What does China have to do with the president's handling of this crisis, other than to blame them for his own grossly inadequate response. He did not cause COVID, but I do blame him for his refusal to acknowledge the problem for political reasons early on when it could have saved thousands of lives.
No, because closing fights was his only response. He literally did nothing for the next few months while governors were left to fend for themselves. Thanks for the debate. Hook'em!So closing flights to and from China except for American citizens and green card holders to come home-- very early in the process-- and then being called racist and xenophobic for it by the media and Trump haters issssssssssss what exactly?
Ha. Closing flights was step number one and he was crucified for it. But hey, let's double down on MORE restrictions before we even know how serious the threat can be. The "experts" estimated that 2.25-2.5 million people would die in this country. So. By that rationale-- 10% of that is still an A minus. And we all get it, you're still upset that your girl lost so one death would have been one too many. But I ask you this, the same "experts" at the WHO are now saying that closing down economies was NOT the answer to this because global poverty will now DOUBLE as a result of the reaction by global leaders. So what's worse? MeeMaw and PawPaw dead, or millions more falling into abject poverty and dying of secondary or tertiary causes?No, because closing fights was his only response. He literally did nothing for the next few months while governors were left to fend for themselves. Thanks for the debate. Hook'em!
What does China have to do with the president's handling of this crisis, other than to blame them for his own grossly inadequate response. He did not cause COVID, but I do blame him for his refusal to acknowledge the problem for political reasons early on when it could have saved thousands of lives.
Ha. Closing flights was step number one and he was crucified for it. But hey, let's double down on MORE restrictions before we even know how serious the threat can be. The "experts" estimated that 2.25-2.5 million people would die in this country. So. By that rationale-- 10% of that is still an A minus. And we all get it, you're still upset that your girl lost so one death would have been one too many. But I ask you this, the same "experts" at the WHO are now saying that closing down economies was NOT the answer to this because global poverty will now DOUBLE as a result of the reaction by global leaders. So what's worse? MeeMaw and PawPaw dead, or millions more falling into abject poverty and dying of secondary or tertiary causes?
If you hate Trump just admit that there's zero way he could have handled this to your liking and we will call it a day. But talking in circles is only showing your lack of how communicable diseases and pathogens operate, and the fact that Trump could cure cancer in puppies yet you'd still cry that he hates kittens is standing front and center.
I hate Trump because he is a corrupt and a dick, but I don't hate him enough to have any American die to prove my point, much less 200,000 of them. I guess we will see in November who agrees with who. Have a great evening. Hook'em!
Quick questions:
1) Who or what ridiculed Trump for stopping flights to/from China?
2) What/when was Trump's second step?
3) What experts predicted 2.25 - 2.5 million US deaths and when?
4) What scoring system is being used to calculate an A- for Trump's reaction as it relates to the current number of deaths?
5) Is the WHO's opinion as it relates to COVID-19 acceptable again and if so when that change?
6) Does every argument about death tolls have to claim only the elderly and/or pre-existing victims are ripe for the taking and is it that big of a deal relative to everyone else's economic viability?
7) Does a person have to use hyperbole to make a stickman argument?
Genesis, I don't think Trump was horrible but he missed the mark on some of this. I only pose these questions for some perspective and because I respect the hell out of your common sense and real life knowledge. Trump could have done better (no question), he did some things really well (and didn't get credit across the board), and this temporary place in time has more cards to play. I don't know I am just tired of the inability to disagree now a days without a knock down drag out event. I'll finish my Lonestar(s) for the night and call it an evening.
Best of luck to you all, keep fighting the good fight, respect others...and tell Herman to go for two the next time. Much respect from a Sooner.
1. Governors/Mayors/Some in Congress
2. Doubt he really had a second step
3. Some service at Oxford showed that # as worst case scenario. Fauci agreed
4. What reaction? Him personally, or his policy?
5. WHO is in the business of protecting WHO. Trust accordingly
6. Answer with a question...do we sacrifice the mental health, physical health of the 50 and under crowd to appease those with already dangerous health concerns?
7. Seems that way...ever check twitter? lol.
From first of April, I've been talking about mental health being an issue, alcoholism, drug use, depression, domestic abuse, etc. I didn't see one single freaking "leader" of this country even bring them up. All I saw was, well if you disagree with the lockdowns you "hate grandma." I even made a post here about it several months ago. The lockdowns were a complete freaking disgrace, and the bleeding hearts will forever ignore it.
I hate Trump because he is a corrupt and a dick, but I don't hate him enough to have any American die to prove my point, much less 200,000 of them. I guess we will see in November who agrees with who. Have a great evening. Hook'em!
Nothing reeks of legitimacy like backing up your reasoning with an out of date article.
He doesn't get the benefit of the doubt because he knew about COVID well before any governor, and still chose to do nothing while millions were being infected.
China knew. But I guess they are off the hook. Right?
You realize that taking side with China vs your own people is a really bad look comrade?
What does China have to do with the president's handling of this crisis, other than to blame them for his own grossly inadequate response. He did not cause COVID, but I do blame him for his refusal to acknowledge the problem for political reasons early on when it could have saved thousands of lives.
No, because closing fights was his only response. He literally did nothing for the next few months while governors were left to fend for themselves. Thanks for the debate. Hook'em!
5. WHO is in the business of protecting WHO. Trust accordingly