It is going to be a while before the defenses catch up in this modern era of offense.
I just spit out my oatmeal.
Are you serious? Link?
No pushback on Briles? That would be Ole Miss on steroids are far as commitment to the W. Is this possible? He is a hell of a coach, and he is 100% committed to winning above all else. But.... Damn.I don't think any real proven coaches are open to change and who knows if Briles is scapegoat of higher ups at BU. He would have been unreal at UT.
It is bad, but also apples to oranges. College football 2016 is basically basketball compared to college football 1970.Damn. That's bad.
No one2005 & 2008 hold some water, but things have changed even in the last decade. Think of the defenses OU and UT had 10 or 12 yrs ago, who in the BIG12 reminds you of those guys?
Ya but we used to pin our ears back and attack on D. This D looks as though we are just trying to "contain" our opponent.It is bad, but also apples to oranges. College football 2016 is basically basketball compared to college football 1970.
They used to call holding, you can no longer touch a receiver, offenses run twice as many plays, and the BIG12 is the most offensive minded league.
2005 & 2008 hold some water, but things have changed even in the last decade. Think of the defenses OU and UT had 10 or 12 yrs ago, who in the BIG12 reminds you of those guys?
Vanderbilt would not have the 40th ranked D with Texas's offense. They are not very good on offense, but they play slow, try to run the ball & try to run clock. They try to play a field position game. And Coach Mason will make someone an excellent DC, after he is canned as their HC.It does not take a mental genius to realize that if a team has the 16th rated offense and the 118th rated defense in the country......where the problem is...amazing amazing amazing.
What would our record be if say we had the 40th rated D, 25th Rated D or the 16th rated D?
If we were 40th (i.e. Vanderbilt), we would be allowing 23 per game...sounds like 5-0...is 40th too much to ask?
It does not take a mental genius to realize that if a team has the 16th rated offense and the 118th rated defense in the country......where the problem is...amazing amazing amazing.
What would our record be if say we had the 40th rated D, 25th Rated D or the 16th rated D?
If we were 40th (i.e. Vanderbilt), we would be allowing 23 per game...sounds like 5-0...is 40th too much to ask?
I just read, "Texas went 225-3 when scoring 40 or more points before Charlie Strong. Texas is 4-4 when they score 40 or more under him."