Speed, let it go, man. There is nothing "dishonest" about me, or my comments. Even though I disagree with your position on Title IX, I'm not making it a personal attack on your integrity, as you are on mine.
Well genius, you do understand MOST sports PERIOD do not generate much if at all money with the exception of.....football.
How much money do you think our mens baseball team brings in?
How about basketball or even golf or track?
Again...UT can afford to add sports.
It's backward ass thinking that keeps us from keeping for the Director's cup year end and year out.
The difference is that the male players actually wanted to play. Plenty of female scholarship athletes just want the money.Agree. If profits are the goal of college athletics then we should field a football team and whatever corresponding women's sports to comply with title IX and that's it. Outside of one sport football and to a lesser extent basketball there is no interest in any male or female collegiate sport. Therefore none of them should exist if profits are the goal.
As far as I can tell Title IX essentially replaced male sports that nobody cared about with female sports that no one cares about.
The difference is that the male players actually wanted to play. Plenty of female scholarship athletes just want the money.
You need to look at the men's sports that have been dropped. Then at the empty venues when the women play. Stanford's budget is a bit higher than the median school. I had daughters that could have gotten tennis scholarships, but not at UT. Men's tennis scholarships are much scarcer. So male tennis players are systematically discriminated against. By Title IX and Hillary.
Have you ever actually watched boys and girls play? Again, I raised 3 girls who played at the top level of high school tennis. Tennis and golf are the ONLY women's sports that actually make money. Tennis in high school is a coed sport. It was amazing how much more the boys played. Yet tennis scholarships are available for girls but not boys. The Brown policy, which I consider equitable, was to help ALL students participate. Hillary brought us numerical equality. I don't know how many times I heard girl's parents praise their chance of a scholarship. The boys parents stay quiet, but they do know the score.What money? Scholarship money? Regardless, that's a stupid argument that I'll counter with girls actually want to play boys only want the money.
So that's why the women's rowing coaches troll the cafeterias looking for big girls that will row for money?What money? Scholarship money? Regardless, that's a stupid argument that I'll counter with girls actually want to play boys only want the money.
So quit acting like you speak for "most" people.Settle down there, Sparky. Yes, I do understand that most sports, other than football, and sometimes basketball, aren't revenue generating. The amount of revenue from sport to sport varies from school to school.
I played college baseball, coached 18 young women (including my daughter) in softball including one of UT's ace pitchers a few years back.Have you ever actually watched boys and girls play? Again, I raised 3 girls who played at the top level of high school tennis. Tennis and golf are the ONLY women's sports that actually make money. Tennis in high school is a coed sport. It was amazing how much more the boys played. Yet tennis scholarships are available for girls but not boys. The Brown policy, which I consider equitable, was to help ALL students participate. Hillary brought us numerical equality. I don't know how many times I heard girl's parents praise their chance of a scholarship. The boys parents stay quiet, but they do know the score.
Girls do compete differently. It's much more personal. When my girls were in high school, we took in two european exchange students. The boys spent hours playing the rest of the neighborhood boys, and desperately wanted to win. But when the game was over, they went back to being friends. My experience with my girls and their friends was that it wasn't over just because it was over.I played college baseball, coached 18 young women (including my daughter) in softball including one of UT's ace pitchers a few years back.
I used to give hitting lessons to a few college baseball players.
I can and DO say this all the time, females play the game of softball much harder than guys do, and that is coming from almost 18 years of experience.
Those that think females just want the money and not the competitiveness of sports haven't a clue what they are talking about.
In fact, a study that was conducted showed that a female college softball player when she finishes her career has the wear and tear of a 40 year old woman.
It irks me when I hear people saying incredibly stupid things like girls don't play as hard as boys....and I wasn't talking about you 1972.
It happens. I would actually like to free universities from federal money. Whether it's art or science, I believe in the free market. The Manhattan project was necessary to counter Japan and Germany during WWII, but I don't think government funding of research and education is as efficient as private funding. This would make Title IX irrelevant.So your assessment of female collegiate sports is coaches scrambling to find girls in the cafeteria to make a team?