Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Five Texas institutions makes zero sense to me. Need to go out of state for a North division.Never thought I'd say it but cougar high is making sense. The big 12 never plays a game in the largest city in Texas whose metro area produces a ton of talent. Does that make sense?
Large tv market, solid, if somewhat dated, sports tradition. Selfishly, it's a virtual home game for Texas.
Then get one of the Fla schools. Whichever one.
Why? Mizzou is in the SEC east and nobody cares.Five Texas institutions makes zero sense to me. Need to go out of state for a North division.
Houston doesn't add what folks like to think they add.Why? Mizzou is in the SEC east and nobody cares.
It adds what I said it adds. No more.Houston doesn't add what folks like to think they add.
To each their own but if a city like Houston, which is fertile recruiting ground, a large TV market and on the edge of SEC territory don't do it for you what do Cincy and CSU do?I'd be up for Cincy and Colorado State if it became a must. It's not for now...
It doesn't bring TV sets. There are a ton of Big 12 alumni in Houston, it's not a zero presence scenerio. Texas doesn't need the addition. That's where I stand.To each their own but if a city like Houston, which is fertile recruiting ground, a large TV market and on the edge of SEC territory don't do it for you what do Cincy and CSU do?
None. You need to ad TV sets to make someone worth it. If the NCAA allows the big 12 to add a CCG then there is no need to add anyone. Right now UH, UCF or USF don't add significant value.
To each their own but if a city like Houston, which is fertile recruiting ground, a large TV market and on the edge of SEC territory don't do it for you what do Cincy and CSU do?
This right here. The BYU and Notre Dame part. Not mid majors but still. They would be great for the conference in my opinion.BYU and Notre Dame.
UCF and USF if you insist on mid-majors.
Hook 'em
So UH vs Ou brings less ratings than Ou-col st?UH doesn't deliver the Houston TV market any more than Rice does. As another poster said, Texas and the Big 12 already have a huge number of alumni and fans in Houston; the Houston TV market is already amply covered. If we're going to expand, the absolute last thing this conference needs is more teams from this state.
So UH vs Ou brings less ratings than Ou-col st?
Or UH-tech does worse than tech-Cincy?
Look, assuming none of us are network TV executives, all things being equal, give me a top 10 TV market that affords the other recruiting/alumni benefits Houson does.
Cincy/colo st love baffles me. They offer nothing.
Colorado effing state? Seriously?
this shill again...firstly, there are no such things as "mid majors"...that's an arcane basketball term. There is P5, G5, FBS and FCS among D1. Hope that clears it up for you, troll.
My bad. It was another guy. Quoted wrong post.Can you please show me where I said anything about Cincy or CSU?
The fact remains that adding a Texas team is essentially trying to make this conference more like the SWC, which is completely insane. Texas already delivers the Houston TV market to the Big 12. If expansion occurs, any additions need to bring significant numbers of new TV viewers. Since almost no realistic candidates would do this (outside of BYU), but would instead dilute both the quality and the per-team profitability of the conference further, I don't look favorably on the idea of adding schools.
What's secondly?this shill again...firstly, there are no such things as "mid majors"...that's an arcane basketball term. There is P5, G5, FBS and FCS among D1. Hope that clears it up for you, troll.
"Secondly", Houston is still a horrible option.What's secondly?
Only an alumni would push for them... I'd much rather stay at 10 and let it run its course."Secondly", Houston is still a horrible option.
Firstly, I'm a UT grad.Only an alumni would push for them...