BBR break out the broom!! What a finish....
What a f*cking game and finish!
Goddamn, have I missed this!
BBR break out the broom!! What a finish....
I think we might have a shot this year. Stanford is on deck and if we can pound them in a four game set.......
No way Reagan is better than Hamilton. Now he might get there, but Hamilton is a ++ glove, above average hitter with + speed. Reagan is a plus athlete but not on the level of Hamilton at this point in his career. But I do like that he is getting quality experience early.We are the #1 team when Mr Elder is pitching. Reagan is a stud, better than Hamilton. That Kennedy kid can flat out swing the bat. Next few years should be fun to watch!
No way Reagan is better than Hamilton. Now he might get there, but Hamilton is a ++ glove, above average hitter with + speed. Reagan is a plus athlete but not on the level of Hamilton at this point in his career. But I do like that he is getting quality experience early.
He is inconsistent with his bat
I was expecting him to make big improvements
I agree x10.Hopefully he'll be back next year
No way Reagan is better than Hamilton. Now he might get there, but Hamilton is a ++ glove, above average hitter with + speed. Reagan is a plus athlete but not on the level of Hamilton at this point in his career. But I do like that he is getting quality experience early.
B12 vastly > $EC![]()
Big 12 has 4 top 25 teams with Baylor and TCU barely in the top 25 and SEC has 11. Yeah, the Big 12 is better. You are right. I guess it is the Media Conspiracy/Bias that D1 Baseball and Baseball America have towards the SEC that so inflates those rankings.
Savage! Straight fvcking savage!Lucci is that you? Don’t you have some stalking in bathrooms to do?
Big 12 has 4 top 25 teams with Baylor and TCU barely in the top 25 and SEC has 11. Yeah, the Big 12 is better. You are right. I guess it is the Media Conspiracy/Bias that D1 Baseball and Baseball America have towards the SEC that so inflates those rankings.
Fine. Then Texas > SEC
More like 6th or 4th depending on which rankings you are using. But ok go with it. If you guys can beat Tech, the Big 12 should be easy pickings. Not another good team in the league.
Easy MM. They can pitch with anybody. Now their bats haven't been all that by any means--- but they've put together a good rotation and solid bullpen. We play one game against them on April 2 and should not take them lightly. Regardless of all the ass whippings we've handed them over the last few years- especially last year-- this will be a tough game.Its not like a&m is good, so there's that. They aren't on Texas' level.
Easy MM. They can pitch with anybody. Now their bats haven't been all that by any means--- but they've put together a good rotation and solid bullpen. We play one game against them on April 2 and should not take them lightly. Regardless of all the ass whippings we've handed them over the last few years- especially last year-- this will be a tough game.
a&m has had some good baseball teams over the years, but the overall historical body of work solidly and lopsidedly favors Texas.
I enjoy heaping them with praise so their balloon deflate will be even greater.I get it, clob. I really do. Just giving the delusional, brainwashed aggy a hard time. a&m has had some good baseball teams over the years, but the overall historical body of work solidly and lopsidedly favors Texas. There is no better all-time baseball program that has the credentials that Texas has.
CWS records
Appearances: Texas 36, a&m 6
Wins: Texas 85, a&m 1
Losses: Texas 45, a&m 4
Finals appearances: Texas 12, a&m 0
Titles: Texas 6 a&m 0
CWS records
Appearances: Texas 36, a&m 6
Wins: Texas 85, a&m 1
Losses: Texas 45, a&m 4
Finals appearances: Texas 12, a&m 0
Titles: Texas 6 a&m 0
History is nice, but today's fans in their 20's, 30's, and 40's think of Texas as not nearly as elite as their fanbase likes to think they are.
You guys have history in both baseball and football. No one will dispute that. And it is a great history. The problem is with both football and baseball (less so with baseball) most of it was back when A&M was a military school and the other schools in the SWC/Big 12...were at a distinct competitive disadvantage. You guys had more money, more facilities, more everything. Heck, you should have won twice as many titles in both sports as you have with all the advantages you had. In baseball for many years, you guys had a really nice stadium while other schools played with a nice field and some bleachers. Since that has changed, statistics like those quoted above are vastly different. Right now, Texas Tech and TCU probably have the two best baseball programs in the state. Both our programs are behind them. In football, the Aggies have had the better football program 3 of the last 4 decades. You guys can dispute that, but those are the COLD HARD FACTS! You guys have had 1 great decade (2000's) and pretty much mediocre the other 3. We will see if Herman has turned the corner. He might have, but let's check back in mid-October for a better picture. History is nice, but today's fans in their 20's, 30's, and 40's think of Texas as not nearly as elite as their fanbase likes to think they are.
You guys have history in both baseball and football. No one will dispute that. And it is a great history. The problem is with both football and baseball (less so with baseball) most of it was back when A&M was a military school and the other schools in the SWC/Big 12...were at a distinct competitive disadvantage. You guys had more money, more facilities, more everything. Heck, you should have won twice as many titles in both sports as you have with all the advantages you had. In baseball for many years, you guys had a really nice stadium while other schools played with a nice field and some bleachers. Since that has changed, statistics like those quoted above are vastly different. Right now, Texas Tech and TCU probably have the two best baseball programs in the state. Both our programs are behind them. In football, the Aggies have had the better football program 3 of the last 4 decades. You guys can dispute that, but those are the COLD HARD FACTS! You guys have had 1 great decade (2000's) and pretty much mediocre the other 3. We will see if Herman has turned the corner. He might have, but let's check back in mid-October for a better picture. History is nice, but today's fans in their 20's, 30's, and 40's think of Texas as not nearly as elite as their fanbase likes to think they are.
What the hell are you talking about? Did I miss something, did you win something in the last 40 years that I don't know about? I'm pretty sure you have been mediocre for 4 of the last 4 decades.
When you look at overall records, conference championships, head to head, etc. during the 1980's, 1990's, and this decade, the program in College Station is clearly better. You guys were WAY ahead of us in the 2000's. So, if you want to say because you guys have won 1 NC in the last 40 years, you have been better over the last 40 years, maybe so. But looking at overall body of work, the program in College Station was better the other 3 decades. Plus, we are now more profitable according to Forbes, have a much nicer stadium, and play in a far more prestigious league.
Bahahahahahahahah!When you look at overall records, conference championships, head to head, etc. during the 1980's, 1990's, and this decade, the program in College Station is clearly better. You guys were WAY ahead of us in the 2000's. So, if you want to say because you guys have won 1 NC in the last 40 years, you have been better over the last 40 years, maybe so. But looking at overall body of work, the program in College Station was better the other 3 decades. Plus, we are now more profitable according to Forbes, have a much nicer stadium, and play in a far more prestigious league.