ADVERTISEMENT

Baylor May get death penalty

man, if your moral scale registers on the "i think what happened to Penn State was to severe"

Just out of curiosity, would you care to spend a few minutes set forth the parameters of your scale.

with the above stated, I gather you are from California -- just when I thought i had some remote clue as to Californians sense of decency, you just knocked it out of the park.

But what the hell, im from west Texas so our ethics probably do not measure up to Calif

What you're saying and what you're thinking as to me is absolutely ridiculous.
 
How many of your know that the NCAA recinded most of the penalties levied against Penn State? They would have also had their asses handed to them had they chose to fight the state law enacted to prevent the 60 million from leaving the state. The NCAA quickly agreed to follow the state law and allow Penn State to control who gets the money? They are slowly releasing the funds in the form of competitive grants and they are keeping 12 million for on campus programs.
 
I disagree with those that think the Penn State scandal and now the Baylor one should not have been treated the same way. Both schools were hiding atrocious behavior by the football team and/or their coaches. They were protecting the revenue generator for the athletic program -- the football cash cow. Fines by the NCAA as a punishment is a foolish idea especially if they are in the millions. Shutting the football program down completely for a year is quite appropriate though. Once guilt is ascertained, universities need to understand that covering up these serious criminal activities to protect a sports franchise won't be tolerated. If this isn't in the NCAA by-laws now then it should be.
 
There are lots of schools in trouble with the Department of Ed for Title IX infractions related to how they handle sexual assault on campus. That may change under the new Administration because they aren't releasing updates at this time. The biggest problem is that schools don't have mechanisms in place to deal with issues of sexual assault or they aren't following their own produces for adjudicating issues of sexual violence on campus. These issues really do fall outside the purview of the NCAA and are best handled by the criminal, civil, and federal courts.
 
.. then be more concise.

If it would have been another poster, I wouldn't have said anything. However, your history of rambling diatribes doesn't exactly help you out in this area.

on the other hand.. its my fault to waist my time in reading
You called me out for stating an opinion about something I never even mentioned but I go on rambling diatribes? Ok dude.

As I said in my post that replied to your nonsensical reply to mine. What happened at penn state was absolutely awful but was more for the legal system as well as civil litagstion, and state law makers to deal with more so than the NCAA at least in my opinion.

The actions at Baylor in terms of title Ix violations, bribing victims with scholarships, not following policy when it comes to reporting complaints. There maybe some legal standing there as well, but those are also things the NCAA is there to monitor and punish accordingly.

To me the penn state situation was so beyond what the NCAA was designed to handle you can't even compare the two.
 
NCAA is too soft to do a damn thing about it. They've seen enough and done nothing.
 
That's because so far the only violations that have come out are some minor recruiting violations. Briles was sanctioned. Its like the fake class scandal at UNC. The fake classes were not an impressionable benefit because non student athletes were taking the class. The only team that was sanctioned was women's basketball because they had proof an academic advisor wrote papers for women's basketball players.
 
Agree the heart of this scandal is not really in the NCAA wheelhouse, even though the events are far more sickening than anything SMU did.
 
Agree the heart of this scandal is not really in the NCAA wheelhouse, even though the events are far more sickening than anything SMU did.
I disagree. If scholarships were given in exchange for silence and students were around to have sex with recruits as Is reported by some outlets. The NCAA would have some standing I would think.
 
There is one report circulating that says this will ultimately cost $200 million plus, between settlements, litigation costs, lost donations, drop off in student enrollment, etc. I don't care how big the endowment is, that is a difficult amount to come up with. And I, for one, work WAY to hard for my money to have it go to pay for the sins of gross mismanagement.
Diadevic, you are starting to sound disenfranchised, much like FlourBluffHorn was a couple of weeks ago. I will make you the same offer made to FBHorn: I will allow you to piggyback on my team and enjoy that fresh Sugarbowl win until you can get your thoughts together but you have to make up your mind by the time spring ball rolls around or you automatically have to openly pull for the Sooners this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: diadevic
I disagree. If scholarships were given in exchange for silence and students were around to have sex with recruits as Is reported by some outlets. The NCAA would have some standing I would think.

The sex for recruits certainly falls under NCAA jurisdiction, but how does Baylor giving scholarships for NDA fall under the NCAA umbrella? The NCAA doesn't control use of scholarships even if it was an athletic scholarship.
 
since someone mentioned basketball....Kansas now finds themselves in a bit of a pickle in BB. Gonna be interesting how that shakes out ( sounds like a clone to the Mixon situation)
 
since someone mentioned basketball....Kansas now finds themselves in a bit of a pickle in BB. Gonna be interesting how that shakes out ( sounds like a clone to the Mixon situation)
How is a clone of the Mixon deal? I thought the KU bball thing was a rape in an on campus dorm during a party that several KU players were at. Am I missing an update on that story?
 
Diadevic, you are starting to sound disenfranchised, much like FlourBluffHorn was a couple of weeks ago. I will make you the same offer made to FBHorn: I will allow you to piggyback on my team and enjoy that fresh Sugarbowl win until you can get your thoughts together but you have to make up your mind by the time spring ball rolls around or you automatically have to openly pull for the Sooners this year.

Bell I am on record for saying many times that I pull for OU in every game they play each year but the RRS......but to openly root for em?. I would rather be deep fried at McDonalds.
 
Bell I am on record for saying many times that I pull for OU in every game they play each year but the RRS......but to openly root for em?. I would rather be deep fried at McDonalds.
The price for piggybacking doesn't come cheap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldhorn2
When I said a clone of the Mixon deal I meant that the KU player was given a year off, but is back this year and a key player at that.
 
When I said a clone of the Mixon deal I meant that the KU player was given a year off, but is back this year and a key player at that.
I wasn't aware of those details. I will have to go back and reread the entire story. I thought this just happened and that they haven't made any decisions about punishments yet.
 
yes...that new one is what got some focus on this "old" one. Anywy...it seemed eeriely like the Mixon one in that it happened a year or so ago and it was handled roughly the same way. Perhaps even worse in that this guy was never suspended as I thought, he was just "sparingly" used
 
The sex for recruits certainly falls under NCAA jurisdiction, but how does Baylor giving scholarships for NDA fall under the NCAA umbrella? The NCAA doesn't control use of scholarships even if it was an athletic scholarship.
Well if the NCAA can't do anything about scholarships for silence your gonna see a lot more of it.
 
A lot of this isn't new, nor is it unique to Baylor. Plenty of programs use pretty girls as escorts and I'm sure parties, strippers and sex occurs as well (to be clear, I do not endorse this and thinks it wrong). The major issue with Baylor is that the program was aware that these parties were unsafe for women and sex was not always consensual. Despite this information they kept sexual predators on campus (at best, helped them transfer to other campuses) , continued endorsing this type of behavior, did not properly discipline players (either internally or through official means). This lead to multiple sexual assaults being carried out by the same players. This is exactly what occurred to the young women filing this current lawsuit.

UT has long used hotties to escort football recruits when visiting the campus (not sure if they still do). They called them "Bevo's Babes" when I was there from 79-85. I know of at least one football player that scored with the Babes.
 
Last edited:
Well if the NCAA can't do anything about scholarships for silence your gonna see a lot more of it.
If you see a paid scholarship as a "bribe", then every single settlement of any lawsuit in the US is a bribe. I don't know if the NCAA has any jurisdiction in this case, but the fact that the school paid with a scholarship instead of cash really makes no difference.
 
If you see a paid scholarship as a "bribe", then every single settlement of any lawsuit in the US is a bribe. I don't know if the NCAA has any jurisdiction in this case, but the fact that the school paid with a scholarship instead of cash really makes no difference.
A paid scholarship in exchange for not reporting a crime against you is absolutely a bribe. Not sure how it could be seen as anything else.

That's completely different than a scholarship given as part of a legal settlement.
 
You want to hear something bat s*** crazy about Baylor? As of now with less than 24 ours to go until signing day, Rivals has them ahead of us in recruiting, and second only to OK in the Big XII. That is subject to change of course. But hey, wth?

Could this mean that the worst has happened and there are no more sanctions to charge them with? Or is Matt Ruhle a lot better coach than Art Briles? I got to admit, I don't understand this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: diadevic
You want to hear something bat s*** crazy about Baylor? As of now with less than 24 ours to go until signing day, Rivals has them ahead of us in recruiting, and second only to OK in the Big XII. That is subject to change of course. But hey, wth?

Could this mean that the worst has happened and there are no more sanctions to charge them with? Or is Matt Ruhle a lot better coach than Art Briles? I got to admit, I don't understand this.

Its volume. OU has 27 commits, Baylor has 25, OK State 20, Texas 16. Baylor is going to have roster issues and they will be signing large classes for the next few years
 
  • Like
Reactions: diadevic
You want to hear something bat s*** crazy about Baylor? As of now with less than 24 ours to go until signing day, Rivals has them ahead of us in recruiting, and second only to OK in the Big XII. That is subject to change of course. But hey, wth?

Could this mean that the worst has happened and there are no more sanctions to charge them with? Or is Matt Ruhle a lot better coach than Art Briles? I got to admit, I don't understand this.

We have a lot of talent on campus, so one class won't ruin the show. Texas will win big this year, and recruiting will pick back up. But this class isn't what I expected. I didn't expect Herman to takeover the state, but I thought he would have more juice than that.
 
We have a lot of talent on campus, so one class won't ruin the show. Texas will win big this year, and recruiting will pick back up. But this class isn't what I expected. I didn't expect Herman to takeover the state, but I thought he would have more juice than that.

I do understand the above replies to me. I just have a hard time believing considering the situation at Baylor that they did this good in recruiting. 3 things concern me:

1. Art Briles never finished ahead of Texas in recruiting. In fact he only had one top 20 class.

2. I wonder if they know something at Baylor that the rest of us don't know. I'm speaking of do they know that the storm has passed and no matter how many more stories come out nothing concrete is going to be done to them.

3. If #2 is correct what if it turns out that Matt Ruhle is a better coach than Art Briles?
 
I do understand the above replies to me. I just have a hard time believing considering the situation at Baylor that they did this good in recruiting. 3 things concern me:

1. Art Briles never finished ahead of Texas in recruiting. In fact he only had one top 20 class.

2. I wonder if they know something at Baylor that the rest of us don't know. I'm speaking of do they know that the storm has passed and no matter how many more stories come out nothing concrete is going to be done to them.

3. If #2 is correct what if it turns out that Matt Ruhle is a better coach than Art Briles?

Or they know something, that we all know...that a lot of people in this country have fake morals. They are all for grabbing p****.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT