ADVERTISEMENT

Biden fear mongering Covid hoax No. 2

That is GOLD.

I'm stealing all of these.
Ok, last one I'm going to post so I don't get labeled a spammer. Remember folks, NEVER question science experts because they always know best.



Hmm, maybe we can bring this procedure back for all the single post trolls that pop in here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Belldozer1
Ok, last one I'm going to post so I don't get labeled a spammer. Remember folks, NEVER question science experts because they always know best.



Hmm, maybe we can bring this procedure back for all the single post trolls that pop in here.
Rose Kennedy says "howdy.....derrrrrr..."


Too soon?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Metcalf #2
Did ya not watch the video in my post above?

I'm over here slaving over a hot stove to get you guys fresh vittles to eat.... and you ain't eating.
You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make that motherf***er drink.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clob94
Bell....sadly, the energy sector will be/has been legislated out of existence. I saw where Chrysler has stated that by 2030 they will be 100% producing all electric vehicles. All the rest are being moved that way. The oil lobby better be trying to get the power plants on Nat gas or even going all oil fired quick! They have a chance as the west will be out of water by then....so no Lake Meade
 
  • Sad
Reactions: LonghornMM
Bell....sadly, the energy sector will be/has been legislated out of existence. I saw where Chrysler has stated that by 2030 they will be 100% producing all electric vehicles. All the rest are being moved that way. The oil lobby better be trying to get the power plants on Nat gas or even going all oil fired quick! They have a chance as the west will be out of water by then....so no Lake Meade
It won't work. Ev's are for a select few. The limitations are endless.
 
I can promise you that I will be the last hold out on internal combustion engine vehicles. They will have to come take my gasoline powered vehicles from me. Typical libs trying to cancel viable, proven technology and not realizing the lasting repercussions. They have no clue how badly this will affect our economy. Idiots.
 


Dateline: Austria-- it ain't all chocolate cake and croissants---- why are you looking at me like that? Yes, the croissant is from Austria-- not France-- you heathens.

Check this out-- starting March 15, the Austrian government says you gotta get your shot OR pay a 200 Euro fine every month until you do. If ou don't pay the fine after a year (2400 euros) then you're fined another 3600 Euros.

If you don't pay THAT fine, then the government raids your bank account. If your bank account is empty, then they start seizing your property to auction off and pay your fine. If you have no property of value, you're going to jail.

I wish a mutha fvcka would.......
 
  • Like
Reactions: Metcalf #2
Bell....sadly, the energy sector will be/has been legislated out of existence. I saw where Chrysler has stated that by 2030 they will be 100% producing all electric vehicles. All the rest are being moved that way. The oil lobby better be trying to get the power plants on Nat gas or even going all oil fired quick! They have a chance as the west will be out of water by then....so no Lake Meade
We won't see the end of fossil fuel usage in our or the next generations lifetime. Nothing against owning an EV but too many people are naive as to where that charge comes from.

Trace electricity back to the source and fossil fuels are used in the process 100% of the time. Yes, that includes solar and wind farms but when you tell them that, you can literally see their brains explode. That damn wall outlet doesn't magically produce electricity out of thin air.

Ignorance is bliss and the rest of us real world people get blamed for ruining the world.
 
We won't see the end of fossil fuel usage in our or the next generations lifetime. Nothing against owning an EV but too many people are naive as to where that charge comes from.

Trace electricity back to the source and fossil fuels are used in the process 100% of the time. Yes, that includes solar and wind farms but when you tell them that, you can literally see their brains explode. That damn wall outlet doesn't magically produce electricity out of thin air.

Ignorance is bliss and the rest of us real world people get blamed for ruining the world.

I'm in the energy business and you're spot-on. Ignorant people don't realize how the majority of what we consume comes from fossil fuels. You can't just flip a switch and change everything. The residual affect would shut down the world and ruin economies. Don't me started, but climate change isn't caused by industrialism and a few smoke stacks or car exhaust. The climate has been naturally changing for centuries, and it will continue to change naturally, and there is nothing than can change that.
 
I'm in the energy business and you're spot-on. Ignorant people don't realize how the majority of what we consume comes from fossil fuels. You can't just flip a switch and change everything. The residual affect would shut down the world and ruin economies. Don't me started, but climate change isn't caused by industrialism and a few smoke stacks or car exhaust. The climate has been naturally changing for centuries, and it will continue to change naturally, and there is nothing than can change that.
Forgot where I read this a while back but an average underwater volcano fart (my term) releases more CO2 than all of human history combined. Crazy if accurate considering it happens daily
 
  • Like
Reactions: Belldozer1
Anyone here a JD and can explain how/if the new ruling by the USSC applies to the work force?
Ok...... ready?

No, I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on TV and I did stay at a Holiday Inn express last night.

The ruling was a wink and a nod between justices. Here's how you know-- companies can not be made to force "vaccines" on their employees-- but HEALTH CARE WORKERS are open season.

Why?

Well, politics. Don't kid yourself, making only 2% of the population do something is still sh!tty.. but it's not AS sh!tty as making ~38% of the population do it. 2% gets your message across. 38% gets your fvcking house burned down and your wife raped.

Look-- there's a reason the Whitehouse is having a concrete blast and wall erected as a perimeter security measure right now.
Because sh!t is about to get worse. The Supreme Court voted this way because-

1. It's the right thing to do. It's following the Constitution. You can't make me do something against my will, even for the "greater good".
2. When the sh!t goes down, the Supreme Court won't be targets # 1 through 10.

So what does this ruling mean?

That's the interesting part. Let's say your company made you get the shot BEFORE the ruling came down-- and it violated your religious beliefs.

Well, you can sue them. Now, will you WIN? I don't know. That's the interesting part. But expect there to be a fvck ton of civil suits falling from the sky very soon.

Now--back to the wall. Joe Biden and Kumstain Harris once told me that "walls don't work"... yet here they are, in the early stages of erecting what- by judging from the photos on line-- looks like a barracade and wall.
Why?

Here's why.

You guys got any farmers in the family? If so, call them.

Ask them what they think their fertilizer bill is going to be this year. You fellas think food is expensive now--- you just wait until this summer/fall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brushycreekhorn
I know one thing, ever since this dipshit Joe has been in office, EVERYTHING has gone to shit including college football. Can you imagine how this country will look in 2024 with the status quo. Not one peep from the resident libtards, not one, they’re just glad Orangeman gone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Metcalf #2
Stupid political theater.

Put him on trial in federal court for lying on his application for a firearm. Then throw the book at him. The maximum penalty for lying on a 4473 form about your drug use is a 10 year prison stretch and a $250k fine. And that's FEDERAL prison. You don't get time off for good behavior.

Then you impeach Biden. Twice. Once for dereliction in Afghanistan, (troops were killed, Americans left behind, and innocent AID workers and children were droned in retaliation)-- the other for his covering of his sons corrupt ties to China and Ukraine.

When Biden leaves office in 2024, he will be forced to grant a pardon to get his crackhead son out of jail-- thus destroying the narrative of Democrats about gun control.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Belldozer1
I've had it. Not bad. Go out to SisterDale to Blackboard BBQ and have the Wagyu brisket. It isn't fair.

1. It's the right thing to do. It's following the Constitution. You can't make me do something against my will, even for the "greater good".
2. When the sh!t goes down, the Supreme Court won't be targets # 1 through 10.
Seems the Supreme Court remembered their readings from Locke and Voltaire, with a measure of Adam Smith thrown in. Asking them to review the Federalist papers might be a reading too far....
 
Seems the Supreme Court remembered their readings from Locke and Voltaire, with a measure of Adam Smith thrown in. Asking them to review the Federalist papers might be a reading too far....
So many ways I can go with this-- but are you saying that beliefs are a product of their environments?
 
  • Like
Reactions: freeper
Seems the Supreme Court remembered their readings from Locke and Voltaire, with a measure of Adam Smith thrown in. Asking them to review the Federalist papers might be a reading too far....

My 18 year old government students will leave my class with a better understanding of the constitution than many of our elected "experts."

But they'll be told to "...try and read the constitution sometime..." lol

We cover many of the federalist papers too btw...even though most of them are not in the TEKS
 
So many ways I can go with this-- but are you saying that beliefs are a product of their environments?
I'm saying that the Supremes recalled Locke's assertion about natural rights to life, liberty and property, and his statement about the rights of a people who find themselves abused by their government. That they might have recalled Voltaire's declaration that freedom of speech must be preserved, especially when it is critical of church and state. (The current church being progressive political ideology) That by making this decision, they offered proof of Adam Smith's dictum that people act in regards to their own self-interest, as you implied their decision was at least partially based upon. Forgive me if I'm putting words into your keyboard.

My 18 year old government students will leave my class with a better understanding of the constitution than many of our elected "experts."

But they'll be told to "...try and read the constitution sometime..." lol

We cover many of the federalist papers too btw...even though most of them are not in the TEKS
When I was teaching government in Nevada, every semester I would go to the local offices of our good representatives and pick up pocket copies of the US Constitution. I would pass them out in class, telling my students that they were courtesy of Senator Reid or Ensign or Heller, or Congressman Gibbons or Amodei. I'd also tell the students that the offices were glad to get rid of them since they weren't using them.
 
Last edited:
I'm saying that the Supremes recalled Locke's assertion about natural rights to life, liberty and property, and his statement about the rights of a people who find themselves abused by their government. That they might have recalled Voltaire's declaration that freedom of speech must be preserved, especially when it is critical of church and state. (The current church being progressive political ideology) That they made this decision, they offered proof of Adam Smith's dictum that people act in regards to their own self-interest, as you implied their decision was at least partially based upon. Forgive if I'm putting words into your keyboard.


When I was teaching government in Nevada, every semester I would go to the local offices of our good representatives and pick up pocket copies of the US Constitution. I would pass them out in class, telling my students that they were courtesy of Senator Reid or Ensign or Heller, or Congressman Gibbons or Amodei. I'd also tell the students that the offices were glad to get rid of them since they weren't using them.
The last couple of years have provided ample opportunities to develop hypotheticals for courses in Constitutional Law or government. E.g.,:
  • Free speech and rights to assemble (and whether law enforcement could have regulated the 90 days of unabated riots in Portland)
  • Federalism and the extent of federal powers
  • The extent to which the executive branch can exact its authority (very relevant to the OSHA mandate issue)
  • The issue of packing the court
I teach a graduate level law course on the side and spend a few weeks on the Constitution.

I can tell from the spirited discussion that it’s the first time many students have had these discussions . . . grad level students!

Is it because undergraduate professors are afraid of taking on what may be perceived as sensitive topics and making remarks that may come back to bite them? I.e., they’re afraid of being cancelled?
 
So I'm looking to build a cabana by my pool and I know prices are high and contractors are busy so after getting a few bids etc. I've resigned myself to the idea that I'll just do it myself. I've done some framing and the cabana isn't hard to build, it's just hard to do by yourself with the structural lumber etc. So I call around and get some prices. I priced out 10"x10"x10' Douglas Fir square columns posts for $368/per. Next I priced out some LVL 2"x16"x16'. I'm going to double them up and wrap them for the header beam. Anyway those are running $245/per and they're being allocated.

**** Joe Biden and what he has done to this country and this piece of crap is just getting started. I have a feeling recession starts this year and Biden has no idea how to get us out of it because he's married to Covid Hoax politics and abandoning all things covid oppression is not a reality for him. It's his whole platform. He's covid hoax.
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: LonghornMM
The last couple of years have provided ample opportunities to develop hypotheticals for courses in Constitutional Law or government. E.g.,:
  • Free speech and rights to assemble (and whether law enforcement could have regulated the 90 days of unabated riots in Portland)
  • Federalism and the extent of federal powers
  • The extent to which the executive branch can exact its authority (very relevant to the OSHA mandate issue)
  • The issue of packing the court
I teach a graduate level law course on the side and spend a few weeks on the Constitution.

I can tell from the spirited discussion that it’s the first time many students have had these discussions . . . grad level students!

Is it because undergraduate professors are afraid of taking on what may be perceived as sensitive topics and making remarks that may come back to bite them? I.e., they’re afraid of being cancelled?

I know I mentioned this much earlier, but no matter the students' position I try and present the contrarian argument. In most things, it is much easier to defend the position of what is now considered "conservative."
 
  • Like
Reactions: JDCPAgolferHorn
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT