No. 4 – The implications of Nick Brooks ...
I want to apologize for this next section because sometimes the negative energy takes over my brain and I just can't help it.
With all of the buzz surrounding true freshman Nic Brooks since he arrived in January, I find myself having the following reactions.
a. I have some doubts about all of the rhetoric, but it seems clear he is headed towards a path of being someone that the program will eventually be able to lean on, which is a hell of an important potential win in recruiting when you consider that players with his recruiting profile historically develop into drafted NFL players about 20%-ish of the time at best.
b. No one had Brooks as a super blue chip prospect in the industry. Only Rivals and ESPN had him as a national top 200 player. On3 had him as a 3-star.
c. What the hell does this say about every other young offensive lineman at his position that he's generated more buzz than all of them combined?
Andre Cojoe going into his third year? Jaydon Chatman going into his third year? Malik Agbo going into his fourth year? Hell, even Brandon Baker going into his second year?
Outside of possibly Baker, the praise of Brooks flashes praise on the fact that all of the non-true freshman offensive tackles in the program not named Trevor Goosby and Baker look like lost causes at this point when we're talking about playing at the levels needed for this program to win a national title. I don't want to say the P-word too loudly, but anyone that Brooks passes in the pecking order over the course of the next few weeks will have to see the writing on the wall.
Does Brooks truly look like a world-beater or do the rest of the guys look so far away from world-beating that he looks like a damn Ritz cracker to a starving man in the desert?
We'll find out soon enough.