Damn UT is too good to give a kid a second chance?He deserves a second chance just not here.
Damn UT is too good to give a kid a second chance?He deserves a second chance just not here.
Maddog KFC urban horn etc.Name one person who is upset that TH replaced strong.
Maddog KFC urban horn etc.
Uhm no it doesn't. But I'm not going on a witch hunt?And the list ends there. Not many fall on that side of the fence.
Just asking, do you think UT admin has never allowed a player they knew had a little dealing history?Texas is about to let a known and confessed drug dealer on its team. Never thought I'd see that day.
Apparently winning matters more than character to Tom Herman.
I agree, he needs a chance but just NOT at Texas.I think Herman needs to do some work on whether or not this was a one time incident or is the kid a thug. If it is the former, I would give him a second chance. People do learn hard lessons in life. Sometimes a huge mistake like this can serve as a wakeup call and he will never go down that path again.
Uhm no it doesn't. But I'm not going on a witch hunt?
Well said dude. We have to help assist our younger generation to get back on the right path not shoot them down and treat them like scum.You don't know shit about leading kids that make wrong turns in life. Give up on children making poor decisions and you sir, are a coward.
Also oblivious to the things that go on behind one of the chief responsibilities in being a head coach. If our head coach looks a kid in the eyes and feels he can trust him because he is accountable and willing to grow from it then You should trust it. In the end, wrong turns can potentially become great stories. This is a misdemeanor by law and certainly doesn't give you a right to take a huge dump on either of them. You don't know shit about what really happens or has happened with every head coach at most major universities. This just happens to be semi public.
Damn UT is too good to give a kid a second chance?
Excellent point. Our values are either consistent or not values at all. Just guidelines that are subject to the win/loss record. Obviously it's not the worst offense ever committed but how crazy would this board be going if he were attending another program.
Ur a idiotIf he's big on character he fvcked this one up royally.
Selling xanax is not a "mistake". Jesus.
Making a stupid decision at the age of 17 can be looked at as a mistake.One of my pet peeves is calling a crime a "mistake." Uh, no. A mistake is when you turn left, and you should have turned right. He intentionally had pills to sell and $1300 cash on him if the reports were accurate. Whether the conduct is labeled a felony or a misdemeanor does not charge the behavior, and it was intentional, not a mistake.
I will support, of course, whatever the powers that be decide to do about this kid, and the deferred adjudication puts them in a tough decision spot. All I'll say is if he were an OU recruit, this board would be outraged. The question is whether this program's core values mean one strike you're out if you sell drugs no matter how talented the player is or whether the conduct is a felony or a misdemeanor in the eyes of the criminal law. A second chance here will set a precedent for future law-breaking athletes, and that may be acceptable for the coach and athletic administrators. I understand the relevance of his past behavior, his remorse, his explanation for this episode, and his demonstrated character before this criminal behavior. This is their decision, not mine, and I will not criticize whatever it is.
Damn UT is too good to give a kid a second chance?
Each case should stand on its own. This board in the past bitched that charlie Strong kicked so many guys out for even just some weed smoking. Texas isn't running a program for just choir boys and no one wants rapists or women abusers in the program or anything. Some seem to be under the illusion UT has not ever had any questionable guys on the roster even under Mack Brown. I don't seem to recall many complaints back then
Making a stupid decision at the age of 17 can be looked at as a mistake.
Ur a idiot
So we are comparing murder to possession of drugs? I lol at that.So if i kill a dude for calling
Me ugly we're Gucci right? It was a simple mistake. I let my anger get the best of me but hey... I'm 17 so....
Just my opinion but it sounds like Leato has already developed a bad case of the entitlement disease so many athletes have.IF Herman allows him to join the team he needs to make very clear to Reese that if he so much as farts in class he's history.
Of course not. But those players didn't receive the publicity like Leitao has.Just asking, do you think UT admin has never allowed a player they knew had a little dealing history?
OkAs long as Tucker Sauer and Lucas Henderson get second chances I'm cool with it. I mean if we're being consistent and all....
Depending on other details unknown to us, I might say anyone deserves a second chance, and especially here.He deserves a second chance just not here.
I agree each case should stand on its on.
I was one that bitched about smoking weed as it is no different than drinking. Being a drug dealer, lets face it just b/c he hadn't got caught doesn't make it his first time. You don't get caught with handfuls of xanax and cash money b/c you just got in the game. His dad is rich and high profile, he was a great athlete, and he thought he was above it all. Pretty good chance thats exactly how it went down.
Does that mean he is an awful person? of course not. Does it mean he should have some consequence? Of course it does. I'm sure Tom is doing his part to figure out if he wants to allow him on the team, its just funny to me to see the "oh he should definitely get a 2nd chance" crowd and then see the bashing of other schools that do the same thing.
Each case should stand on its own. This board in the past bitched that charlie Strong kicked so many guys out for even just some weed smoking. Texas isn't running a program for just choir boys and no one wants rapists or women abusers in the program or anything. Some seem to be under the illusion UT has not ever had any questionable guys on the roster even under Mack Brown. I don't seem to recall many complaints back then
So we are comparing murder to possession of drugs? I lol at that.
Not at all. But he wasn't just in possession homie. 3-4 pills is possession.
20 pills and $1309.00 in cash is selling. Don't get that twisted.
And also don't lose grasp of the argument I'm making to your ridiculous argument. You said people make dumb decisions at 17 and they are mistakes. That's completely not true.
Throwing a football at your friend's house and knocking over their grandmother's urn and breaking it is a mistake because of a dumb decision of playing indoors.
Bringing a pill bottle that is supposed to be for amoxicillin filled with 19 xanax and having $1300 Cash is a deliberate decision to sell narcotics.
End of discussion.
I think Herman needs to do some work on whether or not this was a one time incident or is the kid a thug. If it is the former, I would give him a second chance. People do learn hard lessons in life. Sometimes a huge mistake like this can serve as a wakeup call and he will never go down that path again.
never ceases to amaze me the head in the sand b/c he is coming here and how bad other schools we dislike would be hearing it by taking him.
Just asking, do you think UT admin has never allowed a player they knew had a little dealing history?
IF Herman allows him to join the team he needs to make very clear to Reese that if he so much as farts in class he's history.
Agree. But, there may be more to the story. And, if there is, I'm sure Tom got the story.If he's big on character he fvcked this one up royally.
Selling xanax is not a "mistake". Jesus.
Still you comparing murder to sellin Xanax. That's a stupid comparison no matter how you slice it. I'm not sure why the technical term of mistake bothers you so much. It's a figure of speech when people do stupid shit and get caught and realize the severity of what they just did. They realize they made a mistake thinking what they did was a good idea.Not at all. But he wasn't just in possession homie. 3-4 pills is possession.
20 pills and $1309.00 in cash is selling. Don't get that twisted.
And also don't lose grasp of the argument I'm making to your ridiculous argument. You said people make dumb decisions at 17 and they are mistakes. That's completely not true.
Throwing a football at your friend's house and knocking over their grandmother's urn and breaking it is a mistake because of a dumb decision of playing indoors.
Bringing a pill bottle that is supposed to be for amoxicillin filled with 19 xanax and having $1300 Cash is a deliberate decision to sell narcotics.
End of discussion.
Agree. But, there may be more to the story. And, if there is, I'm sure Tom got the story.
I look at it like this...he recruited him. Reese was not a Charlie holdover. Obviously, he can't come if it's a felony. So Tom knows at some level that a misdemeanor charge is game changer. Now, I have to believe that the decision was made awhile back. No way he allows Reese to come on board unless he's damn sure this is one time deal and there's zero chance that Reese messes up while on the 40. Otherwise, he is likely making mistake. I just don't believe he's looking at it now (that it's misdemeanor charge) and he's taking room temperature.