ADVERTISEMENT

LSU or blowu

Not trying to start anything, just confused as to what was expected...

Longhorn forum..... Our guests are uninvited. I was looking to discuss with other longhorns. Maybe I'll go hang out with Sholz. Surly certainly doesn't tolerate this crap. Later.
 
Longhorn forum..... Our guests are uninvited. I was looking to discuss with other longhorns. Maybe I'll go hang out with Sholz. Surly certainly doesn't tolerate this crap. Later.
Uninvited or not, you know they are here and have been for quiet some time which makes me again wonder what you expected when you create an OU related thread.
Just like the tagged "aggie thread", there are aggies who are posting.
MM does a pretty darn good job of getting rid of the useless posters while allowing the ones who typically add some substance.
 
Longhorn forum..... Our guests are uninvited. I was looking to discuss with other longhorns. Maybe I'll go hang out with Sholz. Surly certainly doesn't tolerate this crap. Later.

And Scholz quit posting here because of two things: 1. He didn't like it that 0U fans post here. 2. He thought he should have a different set of rules that applied to him. I called him out for some of the things that he did, which were in very clear violation of the board rules, and he didn't like me holding him accountable.
 
Longhorn forum..... Our guests are uninvited. I was looking to discuss with other longhorns. Maybe I'll go hang out with Sholz. Surly certainly doesn't tolerate this crap. Later.
@2300 Nueces, I think you’re taking things a little too personal. If your thread is specific as to who can participate it would help if you lay out the parameters in the title or in your first post, not accosting people after they respond.

I think you’re a good poster and hope you continue to post but if you insist on going.......
 
All you Sooner schooner drivers need to call Saul! Its what MM allows and what he doesn't at the end of the Day! you hurt my heart Bell, we let ya sit at our table like one of us, even if ya ain't and you get mixed up in this BS argument, gonna have to keep a eye on you! :cool:


Calm-Only-Australianfreshwatercrocodile-size-restricted.gif
 
Last edited:
LSU would beat OU because of their defense. On a neutral field LSU would probably have beaten us by 14-17 points. We are really young on defense and the injuries are taking a toll. We better get healthy for the stretch run or we could lose to Iowa State and Baylor. Most have believed that 2020 is our year and I think that is correct. If we are completely healthy and make the Conference championship game beating OU is not impossible but is not likely.
 
And Scholz quit posting here because of two things: 1. He didn't like it that 0U fans post here. 2. He thought he should have a different set of rules that applied to him. I called him out for some of the things that he did, which were in very clear violation of the board rules, and he didn't like me holding him accountable.

Every board needs an "enforcer" to make sure opposing fans don't get out of line, but man, he was out of control.
 
Just like you would put money on UT vs OU?

I'm not an $EC fan at all, but any knowledgeable football fan can look at who both L$U and 0U have played and how they've played and see that L$U is the better team. And BTW, I put money on Texas vs 0U and they covered. :D
 
I'm not an $EC fan at all, but any knowledgeable football fan can look at who both L$U and 0U have played and how they've played and see that L$U is the better team. And BTW, I put money on Texas vs 0U and they covered. :D
They covered off a B.S hit call against Murray.

I’m not saying OU would Beat LSU by any means but. Offense. I would take Lincoln, and their defense looked much better and faster and disciplined that LSU’s against us.
 
They covered off a B.S hit call against Murray.

I’m not saying OU would Beat LSU by any means but. Offense. I would take Lincoln, and their defense looked much better and faster and disciplined that LSU’s against us.

A cover is a cover. You wouldn't be just a tad biased would you? Nah, not at all. =)roll
 
  • Like
Reactions: HC-Vodka_Tom
I'm not an $EC fan at all, but any knowledgeable football fan can look at who both L$U and 0U have played and how they've played and see that L$U is the better team. And BTW, I put money on Texas vs 0U and they covered. :D

It appears OU and Lsu have the two best offenses in the country right now. But on defense, i think lsu isnt quite what their past reputation would have you believe. In fact OU actually gives up less points per game than lsu, and i know OU hasnt played a bunch of great offense yet, but neither has lsu.

Texas #35 is the best O they've faced, gave up 38 points.
Florida #51 had 28 points
Vanderbilt around #110 had 38 points
They did hold #32 utah state to 6 but i mean it's utah state

What's #6 alabama gonna do? What would lsu and Ou do? Defensively OU has a lot to prove obviously.
 
It appears OU and Lsu have the two best offenses in the country right now. But on defense, i think lsu isnt quite what their past reputation would have you believe. In fact OU actually gives up less points per game than lsu, and i know OU hasnt played a bunch of great offense yet, but neither has lsu.

Texas #35 is the best O they've faced, gave up 38 points.
Florida #51 had 28 points
Vanderbilt around #110 had 38 points
They did hold #32 utah state to 6 but i mean it's utah state

What's #6 alabama gonna do? What would lsu and Ou do? Defensively OU has a lot to prove obviously.

Here's who L$U an 0U have played:

L$U

Georgia So. 55-3
Texas 45-38
NW St. 65-14
Vandy 66-38
Utah St. 42-6
Florida 42-28

Avg. score 52.5 - 21.2


0U

UH 49-31
S. Dakota 70-14
UCLA 48-14
Tech 55-16
KU 45-20
Texas 34-27

Avg. score 50.2 - 20.3

Both teams do have a very good offense. However, for the most part, both teams have rolled up very high numbers against weak teams. I think that L$U has better athletes top to bottom on their roster and they're the better team. If 0U and L$U played each other, I don't think either team would be able to stop the other, but the Tigers would win the game based on better players.

RPO/HUNH offenses are very difficult to stop. Even $EC defenses can't stop that kind of offense. I'll believe in 0U when they win a CFP game and not choke. Right now the best teams are Clemson, OSU, Alabama and L$U, with PSU, Wisconsin and 0U in the next tier. That's an unbiased look, as you're looking through crimson colored glasses.
 
I am not a believer in LSU or OU just yet.

Not taking a huge leap here, but I think Wisconsin could be playoff team and I wouldn't be surprised if they run the table. And I've seen my Ags beat down by Bama plenty, but that offense they trot out there this year is on a different level. I don't see them losing before the playoff.
 
I get it that the CFP is set up to put the best four teams in it. However, I do wish that they would put a rule in that you have to win your conference to make the four-team playoff. That way it would eliminate two teams from the same conference getting in. No one wants to see that.
 
I get it that the CFP is set up to put the best four teams in it. However, I do wish that they would put a rule in that you have to win your conference to make the four-team playoff. That way it would eliminate two teams from the same conference getting in. No one wants to see that.

I agree makes no sense!
 
Here's who L$U an 0U have played:

L$U

Georgia So. 55-3
Texas 45-38
NW St. 65-14
Vandy 66-38
Utah St. 42-6
Florida 42-28

Avg. score 52.5 - 21.2


0U

UH 49-31
S. Dakota 70-14
UCLA 48-14
Tech 55-16
KU 45-20
Texas 34-27

Avg. score 50.2 - 20.3

Both teams do have a very good offense. However, for the most part, both teams have rolled up very high numbers against weak teams. I think that L$U has better athletes top to bottom on their roster and they're the better team. If 0U and L$U played each other, I don't think either team would be able to stop the other, but the Tigers would win the game based on better players.

RPO/HUNH offenses are very difficult to stop. Even $EC defenses can't stop that kind of offense. I'll believe in 0U when they win a CFP game and not choke. Right now the best teams are Clemson, OSU, Alabama and L$U, with PSU, Wisconsin and 0U in the next tier. That's an unbiased look, as you're looking through crimson colored glasses.

Not sure where all this is coming from. I was just questioning how good the lsu defense is. Any fan of any team can see that, so i do not see how you would presume some sort of crimson shade to my objective comment.

All OU has to do is impress the committee, that hasnt been too hard for them lately, lose 0 or 1 games and win the big 12 and it's usually a good likelihood. Regarding who you have as the top tier- you say clemson, osu, bama and lsu as the top tier and referenced choking in the CFP why OU isnt there, but lsu hasnt even made one yet, so they need to get past not choking in their own conference first. Same with osu in spite of having winning 5 years ago, and lets not forget the 0 points they scored during their last trip. Also I did say OU still has a lot to prove. But I will also say if that defense is still playing like they did saturday, they're going to be a nightmare to beat. I feel good about their performance against tech considering how well they have played since, but i am really interested to see if they can perform against one of these high powered offenses.

I am not a believer in LSU or OU just yet.

Not taking a huge leap here, but I think Wisconsin could be playoff team and I wouldn't be surprised if they run the table. And I've seen my Ags beat down by Bama plenty, but that offense they trot out there this year is on a different level. I don't see them losing before the playoff.

Many thought that michigan's defense really was pretty nasty until they finally played someone. We usually find out who the pretenders are because i am not sure osu and wisconsin are as good as they appear. As usual, the logjam will clear itself out after a few upsets

I get it that the CFP is set up to put the best four teams in it. However, I do wish that they would put a rule in that you have to win your conference to make the four-team playoff. That way it would eliminate two teams from the same conference getting in. No one wants to see that.

Most of the time that's true, but at the same time there are years where the same conference has two of the top 4 teams. OU and Texas back in 08 was a good example I think. It should be a harder for a non league champ to get in though
 
Heisen, you don't have an objective bone in your body when it comes to 0U. You're constantly on here trying to sell everyone on how good 0U is through your crimson colored glasses. Your first two paragraphs above are proof of that. Try to keep up. I was referring to 0U choking in the CFP the last two years in a row, not to mention numerous other BCS and NY6 games in the past. Quit being obtuse. :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlourBluffHorn
Heisen, you don't have an objective bone in your body when it comes to 0U. You're constantly on here trying to sell everyone on how good 0U is through your crimson colored glasses. Your first two paragraphs above are proof of that. Try to keep up. I was referring to 0U choking in the CFP the last two years in a row, not to mention numerous other BCS and NY6 games in the past. Quit being obtuse. :rolleyes:

Of course I do, I have made plenty of objective comments, as seen posts in this very thread in which you responded. In fact my last post you quoted was quite objective.

I am aware of what you were referring to. But they dont have to win you over, just the committee. I dont believe they care a lot about what happened in previous seasons
 
I am not a believer in LSU or OU just yet.

Not taking a huge leap here, but I think Wisconsin could be playoff team and I wouldn't be surprised if they run the table. And I've seen my Ags beat down by Bama plenty, but that offense they trot out there this year is on a different level. I don't see them losing before the playoff.
I am really liking Wisconsin right now. They have some a big game in 2 weeks against tOSU. That weekend of the 26th will be the 1st real elimination weekend. By then, Wisconsin/tOSU, Penn St/Mich and Mich St, LSU/Auburn. ou, Clemson, and Bama will continue to coast
 
Wisconsin looks good. However, I don't see them being a NC contender when it all shakes out. They're too one-dimensional with the run.
 
  • Like
Reactions: q1w2e3
Wisconsin looks good. However, I don't see them being a NC contender when it all shakes out. They're too one-dimensional with the run.

Should be a good game when they meet Ohio State next weekend. My stepmoms side of the family are all Buckyeyes and from Ohio. They have to be the cockiest fan base there is. They are probably my 3rd most hated team behind OU and Aggie.
 
Should be a good game when they meet Ohio State next weekend. My stepmoms side of the family are all Buckyeyes and from Ohio. They have to be the cockiest fan base there is. They are probably my 3rd most hated team behind OU and Aggie.

OSU and LSU fans are a tie for that one. Both are ridiculously arrogant and obnoxious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hornsfan722
While Herman runs the team into the ground with a faulty system, see q1w2e3's post from Scipio, blow u will fall short again. I don't see how either team runs the table if we keep shooting ourselves in the foot with poor coaching. (Texas mostly). Riley is head and shoulders above his peers offensively in the B12. The recruiting services do a great job in revealing sub standard coaching. They do this by ranking the relative talent and exposing poor coaching when teams with better talent lose to teams with less talent. See last Saturday.

We have one of the best talent bases, if not the best, but imo we need to cull some of the teams competing for talent. A big consolidation in Texas cfb needs to take place. We need to remove bailor, tcu, aggy, cougar high, and any other lower level school diluting talent. Teams like Ohio State, LSU, Alabama, Penn State have no in state competition. We need to remedy the situation.
Would LOVE to hear your proposed solution
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT