ADVERTISEMENT

My Observations after re-watching the ND game

Bwilk55

Well-Known Member
Jan 24, 2016
1,348
1,027
113
I had the pleasure of watching the game in person, the atmosphere was electric and the emotion after the Ty-dive for the win was palpable. But, it made it difficulty to get a feel for some of the X-Os during the game. I rewatched it today and made note of some interesting things. I'll break it down by quarter mostly with some general thoughts mixed in.

1st Quarter
- Man, there was a legit fear that things were going to turn ugly fast as ND drove down quickly to score an opening TD. The big running play to get them close featured Nashon Hughes losing outside contain and whiffing on a tackle attempt and Wheeler getting caught up on the inside and to late to get back out and make a tackle. Malik with the chase down was impressive.
- I thought DDavis had good coverage on the TD pass. The back shoulder fade is probably the hardest route to cover, the ball was thrown perfectly, and the WR had a very savvy push-off that created the late separation.
-Our opening drive was extended with a 4&1 conversion at the 20. CS coulda kicked the FG but went aggressive and it paid off. Buechele dropped in a beautiful ball to A Foreman who made an incredible catch.

Buechele's deep ball - Leaving the game I was saying how impressed I was with SB deep ball. By my count he threw 6 during the game. The Foreman TD mentioned above, an early pass to Warrick that was a bit long but thrown in a "only the WR can catch it" spot, a short one to A Foreman that became an interference call, a short one to burt, and then the two dimes to Burt. He also had a 30 yard pass to Foreman at the sideline at the end of the 4th that was just barely out of bounds. Teams will be forced to respect the deep ball this year.

Buechele's Decision Making - In the 1st quarter he threw a ball away on 3rd and 5 on the only play where ND really got much pressure. He repeated the same later in the game. His only bad decision was the throw that was almost picked off in the 4th qtr.

2nd Quarter
- 1st Swoopes drive - when Swoopes first trotted out there, the announcer commented that the fans were booing. He wasn't privy to the Swoopes chant at that point. People were very excited to see him trot out there. In that regard, I think the order of QB play was perfect. Fans were excited to see SB start but still excited to see TS go as well. I think half the fans would have been disappointed with TS starting the game. Also, ending the drive with a TD was nice.

- This 2nd TD had some other huge moments as well. A 4th and 2 at the 40. Oliver with a nice catch and broken tackle on 3rd and 7, on 3rd and 8 Buechele saw the blitz coming, stood in and found a wide open Oliver. Tempo was huge on the QB sneak that followed.

- ND responded with a 30 yd TD pass of there own. A clear break down in the secondary that led Dylan Haines to try and cover up the mistake late. I'm not sure who was in the wrong but either DDavis or J Hall should have been going with the WR who ended up wide open.

- Texas punched right back with a TD of their own. Heard showed how much of a threat he can be as a WR (also had a nice catch on a comeback so not just a deep threat).

- Coaching Miscues - Here is where I had issue number 1 with the coaching staff. 1st and goal at the 1 with 2:30 on the clock. We run hurry up and snap quick. Effective in that they get a 12 man penalty. After the penalty we continue to go fast and run 3 plays over the span of 1 minute. ND gets the ball back with 1:12 remaining. We could have easily run the clock all the way down (or forced ND to use Timeouts) but we did neither. Fortunately, ND did not get any points.
- The second iffy call was a 4&1 at the 50 where CS took the holding penalty to give them 3rd and 13. This one is less clear cut. They got the 1st down on the 2nd 3rd down attempt so it looks bad but I think you force them to make a tough call on 4th down. Heck, they might have chosen to punt. If not, you have a chance to stuff them and get the ball at the 50.

3rd Quarter-4th quarter
- John Burt for 68 yards. Dime by SB, nice catch and run by JB to take it to the house. This will happen again.
- A defensive stand (sack by Vacarro) and then a drive with two 15 yrd penatlies against ND and it's starting to look pretty good for the home team. A FG makes it 31-14

- The collapse: You might have been scratching your head after we blew the lead, wondering, what happened? Well, here it is:
- After the FG, poor kick coverage yields a return to the 40.
- They drive down easily against, a def full of back-ups. Long TD run by Kizer due to Hager following RB inside instead of sticking with his outside assignment. Vacarro tries to fly in full speed to make the tackle and whiffs. 31-21
- Porter returns the kickoff after the TD despite catching ball deep in the Endzone. Silly penalty after the play. After 18 wheeler stalls, SB throws high to an open Warrick on 3rd down and it gets picked. The read was good by SB but with some pressure coming I don't think he fully stepped into this one. Kick ND TD ensues. 31-28
- SB throws high again on the next possession, missing Burt and leading to a 3 and out.
- ND drives again, misses an open Kizer on QB throwback (whew), targeting is not called on the big hit by the Kraken (whew), and Hughes blocks the FG (whew).
- Our next drive ends after 3 plays. On 2nd and 1, A Foreman is called for false start. I don't think it was on him though. Blueitt motions and then steps up to LOS. Seeing this, Foreman steps off the line but the ball is snapped right as he is moving. I think the tempo was just a bit too fast this time.
- Another booming punt by Dickson but he out kicks coverage, we miss 5 tackles, and Dickson is forced to drag the returner down. (he was fired up after the tackle BTW)
- On a third down play, while Kizer is being sacked, Antwan Davis wraps up the WR and is called for holding. A perfect pass to the RB out of the backfield drops in just over Wheeler who had good coverage. Of note, he was faking a blitz so was up on the LOS, gave the RB a few extra steps on him from the get go. 31-35
- Another 3 and out for us, a bad snap slips by SB and we are looking at 2 and 31 deep in our territory. We play it safe and live for another day.

The Comeback: Not much time remains and it feels like ND has all the momentum and Texas is crumbling.
- The first positive play is an absolutely booming punt from Dickson. Credited for a 64 yarder, he was standing on the 12 and kicked it to the other 12 (thats 76 yards in the air). Good coverage to tackle return man at the 25. Dickson was incredible all day, averaged 55 yards. The other highlight was a 54 yard punt he placed OOB at the 13. He could be in the Ray Guy conversation with that leg.
- A good stand by the defense (great tackle to stop a 3rd down play 1 yard short) and a shanked punt gives us the ball at the 35.
- Shane is given permission to keep the ball on read options and spouts off a few good runs. D'onta Foreman keeps punishing ND. He was stuffed on a 2nd and 3 and bounces off for a 5 yrd gain. He caps the drive with that great TD run. 37-35
- Before I get to the extra point, D'onta Foreman really showed why he is the starter. He shows great patience in finding the right hole to run through and then burst throw it with power. Warren looked pretty pedestrian other than a few times when he steamrolled people.

The Extra point: What wasn't shown on TV (reported by Holly Rowe afterwards) was that Texas was missing a linemen on the extra point. With the multiple injuries on the OL, there was clearly some confusion. Connor Williams got sent out with about 10 seconds on the play clock. I don't think the OL was ready when the ball was snapped which allowed some push and eventually the block. This one is on the coaches. 1. With 10 seconds left, just hold Conner on the sideline and take the delay of game 2. If he runs out either call a timeout or signal the kicker to just take the delay. Basically this 3 point swing cancels out the FG block from earlier.

- Closing out the 4th, we had great kick coverage after the 15 yrd sideline penalty to stop them at the 30. They easily could have run out to at least the 40. Defense did its job to prevent a game winning drive for ND. Shane had the boys driving in what would have been an incredible game winning drive for a true freshman in his first game. We got down to the 34. The chop block penalty and bad snap by Zack gave us 2nd and 33. Shane nearly missed the sideline thrown to Armanti that would have put us back in FG range. Dickson bounced his punt at the 5, a better bounce and we pin them deep.

-Zack's snap issues - It was strange in that he had no problems until the 4th quarter. I was looking for even slightly off snaps and didn't see any. He then had the 2 that got fumbled and one at SB feet. I imagine this hasn't been a problem for him. Was it the pressure? Who knows but it killed two drives for us. I was a center in high school, it's not easy to snap while also trying to get out and block. I'm sure he will spend a lot of time on it.

Overtime 1:
- Shane came out and made some very poised throws. The kid was not shaken by the circumstance. Swoopes scores on Ty-Dive number 1.
- After the TD, you could hear a pin drop during the extra point. Some serious nervous energy in that stadium.
- The screen by ND was a perfect call. We blitzed off that side. Kizer did well to pump fake and then lob it over the blitzers.

Overtime 2:
- Great plays by Malik on 1st down and Boyette on 2nd down. The 3rd down incompletion was due to pressure on the blitz (Malik again) and good coverage by Holton Hill who would have made the tackle short anyways (did they complete anything on him all day?).
- Swoopes takes over and runs through 6 people, injuring one, to get a first and goal. A great run by him to shake an unblocked linemen and score on Ty-Dive #2.
- The collected cathartic response from the fans was incredible. It was more than cheering for a win but feeling a sense that Texas is back.

Other thoughts:
Young but not that young: I was surprised to not see more freshmen in the game. Those who played included Shane Buechele, Zach Shackelford, Brandon Jones, Kyle Porter, Malcolm Roach, Andrew Fitzgerald, Jordan Elliott, Chris Daniels. Jones and Porter were on special teams only (not sure about Fitz). Still a big number but there could have been more. No Duvernay or Collin Johnson at WR. No O-linemen came in for injured players. Probably a good sign that we have older guys stepping up. I'm sure we will see more young guys as the year goes on.

Crowd Surf Charlie : So many people want to hate on the response from the players after the win (even some Longhorn fans). First off, realize you are critiquing teenagers on how they celebrate the biggest win they have experienced (it's not like the fans rushed the field). I loved it personally. These guys love CS and they play and want to win for him. You don't see that everywhere. Also, he's tiny so it's hilarious when they throw him around.

TL: DR - great game by the horns with some interesting things that happened both good and bad. If we consistently play like this we will win a lot of games this year.
 
I could be misremembering, but I thought I noticed a few other snaps at various points in the game that Shane had to extend for but obviously weren't as bad as the two in question. Hopefully just nerves and not a recurring theme. I already have to hold my breath and cross my fingers on PATs. I don't think I can do that every snap.
 
I could be misremembering, but I thought I noticed a few other snaps at various points in the game that Shane had to extend for but obviously weren't as bad as the two in question. Hopefully just nerves and not a recurring theme. I already have to hold my breath and cross my fingers on PATs. I don't think I can do that every snap.

You might be right, I just didn't catch it. As a center I was paying particular attention to it but there was a lot more interesting things happening. BTW, thanks for reading, that is a loooong post.
 
He missed several snaps. What I mean by that is, if the ball doesn't hit the QB inside the cylinder, it's considered a missed snap. There were many of those and a few "holy sh!t" snaps as well.

He's a fish, he will improve.
 
He missed several snaps. What I mean by that is, if the ball doesn't hit the QB inside the cylinder, it's considered a missed snap. There were many of those and a few "holy sh!t" snaps as well.

He's a fish, he will improve.

It showed a few times that Shane has skills from playing shortstop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bozans and freeper
My thoughts after re watching?

We gained three x more offense as last year's ND game. And that's with an entirely new offense from the coaching staff on down. We even scored a td in the third quarter.

Yeah we gave up a lot of points but one more time people. Of our top 70 players at least 80% are freshman and sophomores. We have three seniors on defense, Boyette, Cottrell, and Haines. Raise your hand if you think all three will be replaced by somebody better by the time the TCU game rolls around.

So were not going to blow anyone out this year. But barring injuries we are going places this season. UT haters get used to this the Longhorns are back!!!!

*On a personal note it was touching to see Coach Strong's daughter hugging her father when he was interviewed on tv and standing there with him giving the hookem during the Eyes of Texas afterwards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bozans
One thing you missed. On the blocked extra point, the kicker was out of synch as well. Instead of taking his normal 2 steps back, he realizes time is short and just kind of quickly taking his spot without the normal 2 steps back. Not sure if this had an effect, but I was screaming to take the delay as I could tell the play was not setup normally.
 
Wadster...I saw the same thing...I have appologised for the coaches quite a bit in my time, but that is squarely on them....2 extra points in 14 games that caused a loss or nearly did is not defendable....It just should not happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bozans
I actually don't think the interception was necessarily a bad decision. He had Warrick in a crease, for a first down and just sailed it high. The pressure made him hurry the throw. I guess he could pulled it down and taken the sack; but, if that ball is 8" lower, the chains are moving.
 
My thoughts after re watching?

We gained three x more offense as last year's ND game. And that's with an entirely new offense from the coaching staff on down. We even scored a td in the third quarter.

Yeah we gave up a lot of points but one more time people. Of our top 70 players at least 80% are freshman and sophomores. We have three seniors on defense, Boyette, Cottrell, and Haines. Raise your hand if you think all three will be replaced by somebody better by the time the TCU game rolls around.

So were not going to blow anyone out this year. But barring injuries we are going places this season. UT haters get used to this the Longhorns are back!!!!

*On a personal note it was touching to see Coach Strong's daughter hugging her father when he was interviewed on tv and standing there with him giving the hookem during the Eyes of Texas afterwards.

The correct number is 70% of our 83 scholarship players.
 
The two long ND runs, one of which resulted in a TD... came off safety blitz. Haines whiffed wide leaving a huge gap for Folston to slip through on his 54 yard scurry. The Kizer TD was a bounce to the outside with Vacarro being out of position and too close the the tackle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Godz40Acrez
Good write-up. I always appreciate someone taking the time to analyze and give their impressions.

Here is what I noticed, our defensive alignments are too telling. What I mean is, it wasn't a good guess when Notre Dame dialed up that screen pass in OT to score that TD, if you go back and look at the alignment they had seen it earlier in the game and knew exactly what we were going to do out of that defensive alignment. They ran that play knowing what we were going to do.

My impression is this, we want our defense to react and not have to think, so our defensive coaches are keeping things simple for these younger guys. In doing so, we are making those alignments too simple for opposing coaches to read as well. Keeping things simple is fine, but we need to do a better job of hiding our defensive alignments so it doesn't become a tell.
 
Clob...get windows 10 with a touch screen computer.....it does it all. Sadly, I dont have a 6th grader with me to show how it works. You can go to Best Buy and be astonished at what all the sales...uh..sales person can do with all the squiggles...just like Trujon.

Then come home with it only to discover no matter how many trips back to the store for instruction I cant make it do squat....siggghhhh...
 
  • Like
Reactions: TexExSpur
It will be curious to see how Buechele does now that other teams have film. Last year Heard had a great game against OU and everyone thought they had their guy, and then teams adjusted to him and made him beat them through the air. Notre Dame lined up in a base defense and didn't make him make a whole lot of quick decisions and they certainly didn't dial up as many blitzes as I thought they might. Buechele's demeanor though would seem he would handle it ok if they did. I came away impressed with him, I'm just saying he will see new things now. One thing I was saying to my Longhorn buds during the game was that I thought Notre Dame was going to jump that quick out route they kept throwing to Burt and the outside receivers. Towards the end of the game Buechele faked there and then pulled it down to run. The announcers at the time seemed to think it was designed that way. The way it looked is that he was dead set on throwing it and saw the Notre Dame DB crashing the play. Good decision if it was that way.

New OC was impressive to me. The tempo is very quick. That reminded me a lot of when Manziel was playing at the tempo Kingsbury liked to run. That is hard to play against and many times Notre Dame was never got back in a stance. Defense is still shaky but they are at least good enough to get stops and with today's offenses it's hard to slow down teams, but you just have to have a good enough defense to get SOME stops and I think Texas is there now.
 
It will be curious to see how Buechele does now that other teams have film. Last year Heard had a great game against OU and everyone thought they had their guy, and then teams adjusted to him and made him beat them through the air. Notre Dame lined up in a base defense and didn't make him make a whole lot of quick decisions and they certainly didn't dial up as many blitzes as I thought they might. Buechele's demeanor though would seem he would handle it ok if they did. I came away impressed with him, I'm just saying he will see new things now. One thing I was saying to my Longhorn buds during the game was that I thought Notre Dame was going to jump that quick out route they kept throwing to Burt and the outside receivers. Towards the end of the game Buechele faked there and then pulled it down to run. The announcers at the time seemed to think it was designed that way. The way it looked is that he was dead set on throwing it and saw the Notre Dame DB crashing the play. Good decision if it was that way.

New OC was impressive to me. The tempo is very quick. That reminded me a lot of when Manziel was playing at the tempo Kingsbury liked to run. That is hard to play against and many times Notre Dame was never got back in a stance. Defense is still shaky but they are at least good enough to get stops and with today's offenses it's hard to slow down teams, but you just have to have a good enough defense to get SOME stops and I think Texas is there now.

I think they kept the O-plays pretty vanilla and according to one of the ND players he confirms that. I think we'll see it pretty vanilla again with a bunch of running and a few go routes. I think the concentration will be D in this game and getting as much of the players reps. I THINK you are referring to the CAL game as Heards breakout game and that's probably where a lot of Texas fans were excited about his chances of starting.
 
I actually don't think the interception was necessarily a bad decision. He had Warrick in a crease, for a first down and just sailed it high. The pressure made him hurry the throw. I guess he could pulled it down and taken the sack; but, if that ball is 8" lower, the chains are moving.

Agreed, I hope I didn't make it seem like it was a poor decision. Really the only poor decision he made all day was the ball that almost got picked off.
 
It will be curious to see how Buechele does now that other teams have film. Last year Heard had a great game against OU and everyone thought they had their guy, and then teams adjusted to him and made him beat them through the air. Notre Dame lined up in a base defense and didn't make him make a whole lot of quick decisions and they certainly didn't dial up as many blitzes as I thought they might. Buechele's demeanor though would seem he would handle it ok if they did. I came away impressed with him, I'm just saying he will see new things now. One thing I was saying to my Longhorn buds during the game was that I thought Notre Dame was going to jump that quick out route they kept throwing to Burt and the outside receivers. Towards the end of the game Buechele faked there and then pulled it down to run. The announcers at the time seemed to think it was designed that way. The way it looked is that he was dead set on throwing it and saw the Notre Dame DB crashing the play. Good decision if it was that way.

New OC was impressive to me. The tempo is very quick. That reminded me a lot of when Manziel was playing at the tempo Kingsbury liked to run. That is hard to play against and many times Notre Dame was never got back in a stance. Defense is still shaky but they are at least good enough to get stops and with today's offenses it's hard to slow down teams, but you just have to have a good enough defense to get SOME stops and I think Texas is there now.
It was so vanilla and he showed some killer footwork, the only thing they'll take from the ND game is he kept the safety in fear of Burt and then hit Heard in the seam... Other than that, they didn't show anything.
 
A TX qb that can throw the ball more than 20 yards with accuracy. Finally. And he's just a freshman.

58 out of 83 players are either freshman or sophomores. Were not going to blow anyone out that's for sure but we can beat anybody this year.

I already said this but on defense I think it's a certainty that barring injuries there will be no seniors in the starting lineup by the time the TCU game rolls around.

And not many on offense either. Perkins, Swoopes, Domingue, maybe Bluiett, Oliver, and Warrick, that's it.

I think as the season progresses it will be fun to watch the players develop and working together and finding the right combinations.
 
I love the 18 wheeler package as it brings a whole new dimension to the offense and what the opposing defense has to prepare for. However, what are we going to do when Swoops is gone?

does anyone think Kai Locksley can run the same package as Swoops?
 
More Aggie dreaming that this was somehow a showing that can't be repeated. People have film now. Ok, and what should they do with it? Take note of the fact that our RB leaves a trail of defenders in his wake if he isn't hit in the backfield? Maybe the fact that we have two receivers who no DB can reasonably be expected to keep up with (we have two more that weren't even on the film). Unless teams can coach their players to be bigger and faster, they have match up problems. And by the way, I called that before the game. I suspect some teams will try to limit Buchele throwing deep on them all day, but all that will do is open up underneath stuff.
Texas will have up and down games, as it is still a young team with a defense that makes mistakes, but our lumps won't come because teams can study film of the offense.
 
Lets talk Buschele for a minute...He was impressive.He was cool far beyond his years. Several things showed up that few have talked about that usually only come with YEARS of experience.....The wide snaps...when tat snap sailed past him , he didnt panic and he didnt hesitate!...He jetted back to the ball, fell on it and wrapped it up. Seriously, I think half the QB's in the NFL would have tried to pick it up. Following that I counted 3 times when the snap was wide right and he one handed them every time. His baseball roots have served him well. I was more impressed that it never even bothered him He would one handed grab the ball and go about making the play. I believe his mental atributes are even better than his physical ones. I could not be more pleased.

Plus....did anyone notice after Burt dropped that sure 6, Shane went to him and pepped him up. He isnt going to be a leader, he already is.
 
Lets talk Buschele for a minute...He was impressive.He was cool far beyond his years. Several things showed up that few have talked about that usually only come with YEARS of experience.....The wide snaps...when tat snap sailed past him , he didnt panic and he didnt hesitate!...He jetted back to the ball, fell on it and wrapped it up. Seriously, I think half the QB's in the NFL would have tried to pick it up. Following that I counted 3 times when the snap was wide right and he one handed them every time. His baseball roots have served him well. I was more impressed that it never even bothered him He would one handed grab the ball and go about making the play. I believe his mental atributes are even better than his physical ones. I could not be more pleased.

Plus....did anyone notice after Burt dropped that sure 6, Shane went to him and pepped him up. He isnt going to be a leader, he already is.
I feel safe in saying he is the real deal. Did you see him pick the snap up off the turf for a hand off to foreman as well! Ice Man...
 
More Aggie dreaming that this was somehow a showing that can't be repeated. People have film now. Ok, and what should they do with it? Take note of the fact that our RB leaves a trail of defenders in his wake if he isn't hit in the backfield? Maybe the fact that we have two receivers who no DB can reasonably be expected to keep up with (we have two more that weren't even on the film). Unless teams can coach their players to be bigger and faster, they have match up problems. And by the way, I called that before the game. I suspect some teams will try to limit Buchele throwing deep on them all day, but all that will do is open up underneath stuff.
Texas will have up and down games, as it is still a young team with a defense that makes mistakes, but our lumps won't come because teams can study film of the offense.
If you are saying teams don't use film to create a game plan then we can't have an intelligent conversation. Heard was the same way and this board lit up with enthusiasm. Then coaches saw things he was good at and made a game plan against those things to make him beat you with something else. I want to see what he does with an aggressive game plan with pressure from all angles. Corner blitzes, zone blitzes, etc. the few times Notre Dame blitzed he had an interception, almost another pick, and threw one away. I believe he will be fine based on his demeanor on the field and his accuracy was very good, but he wasn't on the ground much. Patterson will have a pretty aggressive approach and stoops might, hard to tell with him. But yes, film makes a difference.
 
More Aggie dreaming that this was somehow a showing that can't be repeated. People have film now. Ok, and what should they do with it? Take note of the fact that our RB leaves a trail of defenders in his wake if he isn't hit in the backfield? Maybe the fact that we have two receivers who no DB can reasonably be expected to keep up with (we have two more that weren't even on the film). Unless teams can coach their players to be bigger and faster, they have match up problems. And by the way, I called that before the game. I suspect some teams will try to limit Buchele throwing deep on them all day, but all that will do is open up underneath stuff.
Texas will have up and down games, as it is still a young team with a defense that makes mistakes, but our lumps won't come because teams can study film of the offense.

Living in Dallas, my favorite offense was the early 90s Cowboys. Not a huge Cowboy fan, but I loved the fairly vanilla O they ran. When you have a great OLine, accurate QB, and bad ass RB, vanilla is your friend. If the other team puts 7 in the box, you run at them until the safety is forced to come up. Then you throw either 1-1 over the top, or to the vacated areas. It's not that complicated. People had film on Troy, Michael, and Emmitt. It matters not if your OLine is getting push on every play. Teams that gave the boys trouble were like the Eagles because they had a great DLine. I just don't see great DLines in the Big12.

Our OLine is one year away from being totally bad ass. I just hope Foreman stays around for another year. We will be good this year and we'll have a chance in every game we play, but figure we lose 2-3 because we'll be 50/50 on 4-5 games. After that, it's going to be a really fun time to be a Longhorn again. Just too much talent at the 40 and more on the way.
 
Doc, it was so vanilla and they were able to keep it that way because it worked, it will be Cal and OU before teams have enough film on this offense.
 
The strength of ND was their D line...at least that is what all the ND fans said that came on here. What they were concerned about was the secondary, but they felt that the D line would be able to bring too much pressure for our QB not to be running for his life to exploit it.

So tell me which film is gonna help the next team? They now have on film that Texas can run between the tackles...against a good D line. They will also know that Texas can go deep. They also now know the texas QB has a very quick release and accurate arm

Can a smart Defensive coordinator use that film to find a way to defeat Texas?...Maybe they can. Maybe they will do all that bullshit you were saying they could use. Maybe it would stop us cold. Now remember the team Heard played on last year was a one trick pony....load the box and force us to throw....that worked.....Whats gonna work now?
 
Too many weapons and the ability to change pace was shown versus ND.

18 seconds between snaps, mercy! When they wanted to go fast ....it was f'n fast. When they wanted to be methodical with the ground game, they absolutely punished defenders.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT