Will the Big12 step in if Baylor refuses to fire Art Briles? There is a group of boosters wanting to suspend him for a year and then bring him back which is beyond disgusting. But winning is everything to some people I suppose.
The Big 12 and the NCAA will not take action until it is brought to their level. I am sure both would rather Baylor do what's right and release the players and remove coaches then for them to have to levy sanctions. Unfortunately, you're right, there are a croup of people a Baylor who are willing to put football and winning ahead of the lives of young women and safety.Will the Big12 step in if Baylor refuses to fire Art Briles? There is a group of boosters wanting to suspend him for a year and then bring him back which is beyond disgusting. But winning is everything to some people I suppose.
It was 15 minutes of inaction, is all...
Do nothing? The President, AD and Coach have been removed! Contrary to your hysteria, Briles is not coming back. There are no plans to bring him back. To be honest, its people like you that are stirring up the Bears. BU fired the President, the AD and the Coach, and you still crap on the University. No one expects a pat on the back, but there is no need to continue the bashing based on freaking hypotheticals.Agree with your assessment SB but since Baylor has made it abundantly clear that they plan to do nothing perhaps the other Big12 members should act arbitrarily in this matter.
1) refuse to play Baylor in football until CAB and staff are permanently replaced.
2) release without penalty any player wishing to leave
3) Fire everyone in the athletic department immediatly
The BOR met, but did not vote on the future of Briles. So no need to bring up "reprehensible." Now you've moved the ball "Student-athletes who want to leave should be given their full release immediately." Who - Everyone on the team?I am responding to a story that said boosters want Briles suspended for one year and then re-hired. If this is true it is reprehensible. If it's not true then that is a step in the right direction. Student-athletes who want to leave should be given their full release immediately.
That's how it was with that other sexual abuse scandal. It's not like this is without very recent precedent."Student-athletes who want to leave should be given their full release immediately." Who - Everyone on the team?
No, I am not saying under NO circumstance will Art be brought back. But I see you have now brought in another hypothetical. So here is one for you - what if it can be proven that Tevin Elliot's and Sam U's accusers paid cash to the jury for their verdict, and every other person who has alleged any misdeeds all recanted and provided video proof that they were paid for providing false stories by Bob Ley and OTL - would you take Briles back? That is a stupid hypothetical, as is any hypothetical in this matter. Stick to the facts. And as for your last sentence - Baylor is in this mess because Briles recruited thugs. If you are willing to take those thugs, it looks like you become the enabler.Diadevic are you saying that under no circumstances will Art be brought back? As for your question I was thinking of the incoming freshman class but now that you mention it giving releases to any player who want one is a very good idea. Most decent human beings don't want to be associated with an institution that enables and covers up rape and murder.
Briles is pretty jacked for a 60+ man - those prisoners better watch out!Compromise.
Baylor gets to keep their coach, but the prisoners at any nearby federal prisons get to rape him anytime they want.
Littleton - no offense intended. My fuse is just a little shorter today.Diadevic are you saying that under no circumstances will Art be brought back? As for your question I was thinking of the incoming freshman class but now that you mention it giving releases to any player who want one is a very good idea. Most decent human beings don't want to be associated with an institution that enables and covers up rape and murder.
No, I am not saying under NO circumstance will Art be brought back. But I see you have now brought in another hypothetical. So here is one for you - what if it can be proven that Tevin Elliot's and Sam U's accusers paid cash to the jury for their verdict, and every other person who has alleged any misdeeds all recanted and provided video proof that they were paid for providing false stories by Bob Ley and OTL - would you take Briles back? That is a stupid hypothetical, as is any hypothetical in this matter. Stick to the facts. And as for your last sentence - Baylor is in this mess because Briles recruited thugs. If you are willing to take those thugs, it looks like you become the enabler.
Bite me. I calmed down, apologized, and now you call me out - Littleton DID propose a hypothetical. And I proposed one back. As you almost correctly identified (only one BU player, not players, have been found guilty of rape, but as you like to say, why let pesky facts get in the way), there are plenty of facts and shortcomings to criticize, but one of them is NOT "what if" Baylor refuses to fire Briles.What are you talking about???
You don't just get to make stuff up as a defense because someone made a point (I didn't see anything he posed as a hypothetical). BU players are GUILTY of rape. Coaches guilty of covering it up. Institution and police too. And there were WAY more than 2 girls. You don't just get to say "well WHAT IF" it all never really happened and it was all some conspiracy from 2 girls. WTF.
To your last point. NO ONE is looking to take Sam U after his rapes (well except for BU). No one is looking to take the abuser you took from Penn St (not even a single NFL team after he was projected as a 1st rounder). No one wants any of your rapists. Just a few HS kids that have never attended BU yet are looking to get out of this mess. So in one stroke you paint BU innocent and blame the girls. And in the other stroke you label kids who haven't set foot on campus yet as THUGS.
What the Hell man? Get a grip. You've gone full retard here.
Bite me. I calmed down, apologized, and now you call me out - Littleton DID propose a hypothetical. And I proposed one back. As you almost correctly identified (only one BU player, not players, have been found guilty of rape, but as you like to say, why let pesky facts get in the way), there are plenty of facts and shortcomings to criticize, but one of them is NOT "what if" Baylor refuses to fire Briles.
Makes ya appreciate Charlie doesn't it?
Hook'em
Sow the wind, reap the whirlwind.To be honest --- if we are going to release all the players, then go ahead and self impose the death penalty. The fact is, football wise, we have no recruiting class for next year, we may or may not have one for this year. With looming Title IX/NCAA investigations, which will create uncertainty another couple of years, BU will have horrible recruiting classes for the foreseeable future. And right now we have a 63 year old "interim" coach who had losing records the last 4 years. We need to go all in either one two ways - give the middle finger to the public, keep Briles, plow ahead and take the public scorn, or self impose the death penalty, release all players and start completely over. Anything in between will just be a bandaid over shotgun blast.
To be honest --- if we are going to release all the players, then go ahead and self impose the death penalty. The fact is, football wise, we have no recruiting class for next year, we may or may not have one for this year. With looming Title IX/NCAA investigations, which will create uncertainty another couple of years, BU will have horrible recruiting classes for the foreseeable future. And right now we have a 63 year old "interim" coach who had losing records the last 4 years. We need to go all in either one two ways - give the middle finger to the public, keep Briles, plow ahead and take the public scorn, or self impose the death penalty, release all players and start completely over. Anything in between will just be a bandaid over shotgun blast.
That's how it was with that other sexual abuse scandal. It's not like this is without very recent precedent.
The NCAA fined the school $60 million, imposed a four-year postseason ban on Penn State football, significantly reduced the number of scholarship players the team can field over the next four years, placed the program on probation for five years and enabled any current or incoming player to transfer and play immediately without restriction.