ADVERTISEMENT

Plug and Play Graduate Students

FlourBluffHorn

Well-Known Member
Jan 5, 2007
8,762
1,981
113
Are they really worth just 1 yr of playing time? Seems like it would be easier to train one instead, Zarie had no intention of coming here, he wasn't that good at ND anyway so no loss. Coaches need to start teaching kids to play diff positions on the team, we needa TE , then teach one, earn that big money we paying you



Hook'em
 
Personally, I'm not a fan of the one hitter quitter. I rather recruit a high school kid any day UNLESS the one year player will be an immediate impact player and he can show a freshman how to be a leader. Don't get a one year wonder if he's a so so player
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlourBluffHorn
Personally, I'm not a fan of the one hitter quitter. I rather recruit a high school kid any day UNLESS the one year player will be an immediate impact player and he can show a freshman how to be a leader. Don't get a one year wonder if he's a so so player
The question is, what do you have to lose? If you have scholarships available, you might as well fill it. If it means you have an extra body in the rotation at DL, more depth at OL, or an experienced backup QB that can come in if there is an injury.
 
I think it works fine if you are in a short term pinch. Like TAMU QB situation last year. Knight was a good one year fit when they really needed it.
 
Personally, I'm not a fan of the one hitter quitter. I rather recruit a high school kid any day UNLESS the one year player will be an immediate impact player and he can show a freshman how to be a leader. Don't get a one year wonder if he's a so so player

Well that's the whole point. No coach expects anyone to be bad or else they wouldn't recruit them. If you are in a pinch signing up another high school player isn't going to do you any good the next season. Obviously every coach would love to have all their players develop to the point where grad transfers wouldn't help but it doesn't always work out that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cwillfromdatx
The graduate transfer rule is the unrestricted free agency of college football, and to not leverage it would be putting yourself at a competitive disadvantage relative to the rest of teams in the country who are - which is pretty much everybody, even the academic schools such as Stanford and Notre Dame are taking graduate transfers in football and other sports.

It's an outstanding way to utilize otherwise unconsumed scholarships among the allotted 85, to supplement your depth chart with physically, academically and socially mature players, even if they're not superstars on the field. Only utilizing it for elite players is not a viable strategy. If they're an elite player then they're not likely wanting for playing time at their current school (the most common reason for transferring), or they're off to the NFL. Typically what you're getting is a serviceable (or better) 2-deep-caliber player who may be blocked a bit on the depth chart by another player(s) at his current school, may not be a scheme fit for a new coaching staff, or who simply wants to challenge himself at a higher level of competition (ex: Gehrig Dieter, an uber-productive All-MAC WR at Bowling Green who played his final season at Alabama in 2016).

Were it not for this avenue, Texas would enter this season with Garrett Gray as its #2 TE. Think about that. Instead, we'll have Kendall Moore from Syracuse, a physically mature and capable receiver/blocker, who saw ample time for the Orange over the past several seasons as both a TE and special teams player, and who is fully ready to step right into the Longhorns' 2-deep alongside Andrew Beck - something no other TE on Texas' projected 2017 roster can say.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT