Oh for sure. Shaka can afford his own island now. Which is probably a good thing. Go live on your own private island and stop teaching kids how to play lackluster basketball.shaka may be a nice dude-- i dunno him personally-- but so was charlie strong, and he had to go too. and don't be too sad for either of them-- their bank accounts are far more swollen than mine.
Please don’t take this as attacking. But how do you see it as dormant? Texas has never been a “basketball program”. One final four in the last 70 years. A handful of Sweet 16s, pretty much in one small stretch of time.there's a difference between giving up and waiting for a better situation. the program isn't dead, it's dormant.
who is the coach that you would go after?
Please don’t take this as attacking. But how do you see it as dormant? Texas has never been a “basketball program”. One final four in the last 70 years. A handful of Sweet 16s, pretty much in one small stretch of time.
A volcano has to have erupted before its called a dormant volcano. I just don’t see Texas as this.
If you’re looking at it differently, I understand.
Please don’t take this as attacking. But how do you see it as dormant? Texas has never been a “basketball program”. One final four in the last 70 years. A handful of Sweet 16s, pretty much in one small stretch of time.
A volcano has to have erupted before its called a dormant volcano. I just don’t see Texas as this.
If you’re looking at it differently, I understand.
Absolutely no apologies needed. It’s a message board, and posts are generally open to everyone. Thanks for explaining yourself like you did.Apologies, not my post I know, but sorry you do seem to be attacking by creating the "basketball program" strawman. Is Texas NC, Duke, UConn, or KU or the likes. No, obviously.
I don't know whether we are or ever have been a "basketball program". Baylor is certainly not a "basketball program" either but they are the No. 1 team in the country right now, so you could say they're not dormant but they were dormant before for sure.
Here's what the last 2 basketball coaches at UT have accomplished. We may not be a "basketball program" but we certainly are dormant compared to what we had been.
1 Final Four (2003)
4 Elite Eight (1990, 2003, 2006, 2008)
7 Sweet Sixteens (1990, 1997, 2002–04, 2006, 2008)
24 NCAA Tournament appearances
3 Southwest Conference championships (1992, 1994, 1995)
3 Big 12 Conference championships (1999, 2006, 2008)
4 seasons with 25 wins or more (1989, 1994)
2 seasons with 30 wins or more (2006, 2008)
22 seasons with 20 wins or more (1989–92, 1994–96, 2000–2012, 2014, 2015)
School-record 13 consecutive 20-win seasons (2000–2012)
Highest win % (.734) for any 10-year period in program history (2002–11) during Tournament era
No. 10 nationally in win % for decade of 2000–09 (.732)
2 top-five poll finishes (2003, 2008)
5 top-ten poll finishes (2003, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2011)
4-time Big 12 Coach of the Year
2 Naismith Award Winners
John R. Wooden Legends of Coaching Award recipient (2009)
17th in all time wins (1790) - spanning all coaches
Bottom line, we were much better before as you can see, and we can and should be better again with a different coach. Whether we are or were a "basketball program" is irrelevant.
Good research Deutsch. I don't know if UT BBall should be elite, but it dang sure should be better than the crap rolled out the last couple of years - as proven by Barnes and Penders. Coach Fran had an amazing stat last night - over the last 3 years, UT has ELEVEN top 100 national recruits, and Baylor has TWO. Some guys underachieve, some overachieve, one or so may have turned pro, injuries/sickness, etc. etc. etc. - but that's a first team, a second team and an extra left over of top 100 guys. So even if some don't cut it or leave early, there still should be plenty of depth. This ain't about talent. I swear their whole offense is four guys standing around watching Coleman dribble. I think Coleman is a player (and Sims was great last night), but sakes alive give him an offense to run. Time to move on!Yes, that's the way I took it; i.e. 'nice to be back to where we were', though I would add, as you can see, 'where we were' was pretty good, even if wasn't 'elite'. A lot of programs would like to have produced the results Penders and Barnes did at Texas, even if not it's not an 'elite' resume.
the last 3 years, UT has ELEVEN top 100 national recruits, and Baylor has TWO.
You need to be working out in Scottsdale. More fake bewbs and WAY more bored stepford wives.So this might make you guys chuckle a bit. The wifee and i just joined a new gym in north Phoenix . . . called EOS Fitness. Today was my 1st workout there.
Now picture this, there i am on the Hammer Strength bench press machine . . . trying my best to impress the 20 yr old scantily clad B-cup hard bodies at my 2 oclock . . .
When i notice some burnt orange streak across the 70'' TV at my 1 oclock high. Low and behold its Texas vs Iowa St . . . and we're down by 30 late in the game.
Im decked out in my Texas gear! Hat, shoes, socks . . . and everyone is laughing at my ass!
Well, glad i made a funny 1st impression but i dont think those girls are gonna flirt with me anytime soon!
Absolutely no apologies needed. It’s a message board, and posts are generally open to everyone. Thanks for explaining yourself like you did.
I don’t think my “basketball program” statement is a straw man argument, or at least wasn’t intended to be. It’s in direct response to the poster’s statement of Texas being a dormant program. The general theme of that to me was “we can be back to elite”. ElCapitan never used the term elite...I just read into it that way. If I totally misused his intent wrong, that’s on me. Very possibly he meant as you stated, back to what you guys were with Penders and Barnes. Which would make it a straw man argument.
Thanks!
Barnes is a great coach, and has a good run here. Could be argued though that he underachieved here given the level of talent he was able to get on a regular basis.Micco, you're the only Sooner I'd engage with. I take all your posts as good-faith efforts.
Barnes had successful years and showed us how good our baseline can be. We're not going to be Kansas, but we were always in the conversation for Big 12 titles. I feel the same way about Oklahoma and Iowa State.
If he’s back next year I think he’s here longer. He’s probably got the best group coming back he’s ever hadHe'll be back next year. Really, what difference does it make? Texas has one less year to pay off on his horrible contract. He'll 100% be gone before the new arena opens though.
25 wins????If he’s back next year I think he’s here longer. He’s probably got the best group coming back he’s ever had
Coleman(probably)
Ramey is finally coming in to his own late in the season.
Jones will actually get an off-season to work on basketball
Baker and Kai are back with a year under their belt
Simms probably back for SR year.
on paper anyway that’s a 25 win team next year and if that happens(on anywhere close) Shaka probably gets an extension.
I said on paper. Doesn’t mean they’ll get there. Not as far fetched as you think either. I mean decent chance they have 20 going in to the big 12 tournament this year.25 wins????
Que the puff puff kitty!
They could finish with close to 25 wins this year even as bad as it has been. Not sure why that sounds ridiculous.25 wins????
Que the puff puff kitty!
Yeah overall this team really hasn’t been bad. They’ve just had moments where they’ve looked pretty terrible.They could finish with close to 25 wins this year even as bad as it has been. Not sure why that sounds ridiculous.
Yeah overall this team really hasn’t been bad. They’ve just had moments where they’ve looked pretty terrible.
I agree that beating Tech was a good win, but remember, Tech has a younger team than we do.Yeah overall this team really hasn’t been bad. They’ve just had moments where they’ve looked pretty terrible.
The 4th and 5th worst losses in the 100 year history of the program have occurred in the last 40 days. There’s 80 minutes of “moments”.It’s been more than just “moments.”
Irrelevant. Wins are wins and losses are losses close losses don’t count less than blowouts and vice versaT
The 4th and 5th worst losses in the 100 year history of the program have occurred in the last 40 days. There’s 80 minutes of “moments”.
Effort and preparedness are irrelevant? Tell that to Mackovic! This is a nice run they have going. To me it just highlights the wild inconsistencies of the Smart era.Irrelevant. Wins are wins and losses are losses close losses don’t count less than blowouts and vice versa