Rick Barnes laughing his ass off.
He had to go man. He lost his mojo. His last 5-6 years at Texas were pretty pedestrian.
Rick Barnes laughing his ass off.
not going to argue with you about that, in fact I agree with you. Just the same, Barnes is doing quite well at Tenn. I don't see our new AD sticking with Smart if this continuesHe had to go man. He lost his mojo. His last 5-6 years at Texas were pretty pedestrian.
Yes, but, not on the immediate hot seat. He has next season in my opinion.Premature here is Shaka on the hot seat?
not going to argue with you about that, in fact I agree with you. Just the same, Barnes is doing quite well at Tenn. I don't see our new AD sticking with Smart if this continues
When I was a little boy, they didn't have near as many timeouts in football. As tv revenue increased, commercial timeouts were invented. My dad would say:"time out for a commercial".I've got an open contract out on the dude that invented TV time outs. It won't end pretty.
Texas basketball has been mediocre and unwatchable for years. I couldn’t watch the last minute of the game because I knew we would blow it. If Shaka can not change coaching strategy and recruiting then he has to go. Unfortunately I think all of college basketball is headed into the crapper unless they go to allowing players to go straight to the NBA out of high school or go to college for 3 years minimum.
Texas basketball has been mediocre and unwatchable for years. I couldn’t watch the last minute of the game because I knew we would blow it. If Shaka can not change coaching strategy and recruiting then he has to go. Unfortunately I think all of college basketball is headed into the crapper unless they go to allowing players to go straight to the NBA out of high school or go to college for 3 years minimum.
46.3 percent from the field. Good. 45.8 from the 3. Excellent. 55.6 percent free throws. Crap. I don't think that's coaching. While the offense looks stagnant, Texas does get open shots which after all is the point. The story of this season: The players have consistently failed to make shots they are capable of making...not Shaka.
Maybe Shaka should have them practice free throws
I assume you are being facetious, because all college level players practice shooting all sorts of shots for hours on end and have been doing so since they were in elementary school.
If Roach makes 2 free throws instead of missing the front end of a one and one and no one is talking about half time adjustments, no one is talking about half court offense, and no one is talking about firing Shaka. Instead we're talking about the great game played by Roach and Coleman and how good guard play is the key to advancing.
“They didn’t suck in high school”. That’s a stupid argument. Nobody playing D1 sports sucked in high school. They were all the top one or two kids on their respective high school teams.So why are the highly recruited players Shaka recruits suck at shooting? They didn’t suck in high school.
"If Roach makes 2 free throws instead ofmissing the front end of a one and one and no one is talking about half time adjustments, no one is talking about half court offense, and no one is talking about firing Shaka."
Wrong Mang......anyone who has watched this team all year long would STILL be talking about all of the above.
Go check the thread titled "Let's See If We Can Finish" It was posted after the WVU victory. A game with all the normal, ugly basketball Texas plays, but no one in that thread was talking about firing Shaka. Yeah, there was some grumbling as the thread extended to comments about the ISU tournament game, but of course since Texas won that one too, there was no fire Shaka. "Fire Shaka' experts only show after a loss.
Our team doesn't shoot well. End of story.
“They didn’t suck in high school”. That’s a stupid argument. Nobody playing D1 sports sucked in high school. They were all the top one or two kids on their respective high school teams.
I don’t think it has anything to do with his recruits sucking at shooting. Coleman improved his offensive game as the season went along. The book on him coming out of high school was he was a pass first guy with limited offensive skills. That’s not the book on him.
Roach has come a LONG way offensively. I think a lot of players fall in to his catagorey. I think in high school he was such a better athlete than everyone else he never had to work to be great. In college he had to figure out that everyone was a great athlete. He finally bought in and went to work, and it showed this year.
Jase- he struggled his freshman year. Most freshman struggle their freshman year.
That to me is how the one and done has hurt college ball. Every freshman is expected to come in and be a stud, and the truth is the great freshman are the exception not the rule
I think Shaka is doing fine. Players Ovbiously get better under him you just look at Roach, Coleman, jones(before he got sick) even young got better.
My one critique of his job so far is I would stay away from recruiting the elite big men. Guys like Bamba,and Allan are incredibly talented but big guys take a while to develop and they just aren’t going to give you there best basketball. Their best basketball is likely coming after they leave.
I would build my team around elite guards and raw talented, maybe even underrecruited big men(like Simms). Go get players like he had at VCU and add a big man you like to that. Don’t build a team around an elite big man. It’s not going to work that often
Go check the thread titled "Let's See If We Can Finish" It was posted after the WVU victory. A game with all the normal, ugly basketball Texas plays, but no one in that thread was talking about firing Shaka. Yeah, there was some grumbling as the thread extended to comments about the ISU tournament game, but of course since Texas won that one too, there was no fire Shaka. "Fire Shaka' experts only show after a loss.
Our team doesn't shoot well. End of story.
Because in college basketball especially the most talented team isn’t always the best team. That’s true in all sports but especially true in college basketball. That’s the point people are missing. If it was just about talent Kentucky would win the title every year because they have 5 lottery picks.He loses to less talented teams and has been doing it all year.
Yep but something like this has been coming for a while. A lot of the big schools have bought in to the one and done, and that’s all good but come tournament time. It’s usually the teams with jrs and sr’s that get the wins.This is truly the most fvcked up NCAA tourney I've ever seen.....
Not surprising. Big 12 was easily the best confrance all year..Not to go aggy here buuut, Big XII owns 25% of sweet 16. Just sayin.....