I probably wasn't clear, I was talking about OU's tiny corners.I don't think Texas has a single DB under 5-10 Most of the Texas corners are 6ft or taller
I probably wasn't clear, I was talking about OU's tiny corners.I don't think Texas has a single DB under 5-10 Most of the Texas corners are 6ft or taller
Some guy asked if Texas's defense was as good as Alabama's. I thought he was trolling.Why do all aggys pull for a conference? Its embarrassing for you guys. Its like Rutgers pulling for Ohio State and Michigan to do good, thinking that it makes them good by association. A team should be all for one. To hell with the rest of the conference. Alabama, Georgia, LSU, Florida, etc doing good has nothing to do whether a&m has any credibility or is a good team. Can you speak for aggys and explain this bizarre reasoning about their infatuation with the shameless $EC cheerleading? No one gets this mentality.
Some guy asked if Texas's defense was as good as Alabama's. I thought he was trolling.
If Georgia gets in the playoffs I will 100% be pulling for them. I will also 100% pull against Alabama, as I am sick to death of them running the game. Saban gets anybody he wants, it is sickening. But I am not blind to the fact of which teams have the best players. Doesn't matter if I like them or not.
I maybe can explain some of it, but I have issues with some of the Bama nut hugging myself. I hate those MFers.I hear what you're saying. I think that everyone outside of Alabama fan is sick and tired of Bama. That said, can you, or any other ag, explain the bizarre $EC conference cheerleading thing that aggy does?
If the SEC is head and shoulders above other conferences then why did it take the SEC champ Georgia last year overtime to beat Oklahoma. And Oklahoma had that game won to be honest. Then Georgia almost went on to beat Bama. So your logic is flawed!I maybe can explain some of it, but I have issues with some of the Bama nut hugging myself. I hate those MFers.
So for me, why I pull for SEC teams when playing out of conference -recruiting and higher profile games.
I want the SEC to dominate the draft every year, win the most bowl games, have the highest profile games on the best networks in the best time slots, and dominate the playoffs. I also want A&M to pull it's own weight, but 2nd in the west is our ceiling as long as Saban is breathing. And that is the main reason I hate Bama and ther recruiting juggernaut.
I want those things so I can get excited about 7 or 8 games a year. I love the big games and hate the brunch time games. And most importantly recruiting. All the top high school kids think they are NFL good. As long as the SEC continues to dominate, you can sell playing in the SEC vs Pros or in the BIG12 vs Joes.
I really do think the SEC is head and shoulders above the other conferences, and I want credit for playing in those venues against those teams. Doesn't mean I like Bama, LSU, Auburn, or Mississippi State - I don't.
To me one conference having the best 2 teams at the end, while the other 4 teams had none is a sign of dominance. Even if the games are close.If the SEC is head and shoulders above other conferences then why did it take the SEC champ Georgia last year overtime to beat Oklahoma. And Oklahoma had that game won to be honest. Then Georgia almost went on to beat Bama. So your logic is flawed!
I maybe can explain some of it, but I have issues with some of the Bama nut hugging myself. I hate those MFers.
So for me, why I pull for SEC teams when playing out of conference -recruiting and higher profile games.
I want the SEC to dominate the draft every year, win the most bowl games, have the highest profile games on the best networks in the best time slots, and dominate the playoffs. I also want A&M to pull it's own weight, but 2nd in the west is our ceiling as long as Saban is breathing. And that is the main reason I hate Bama and ther recruiting juggernaut.
I want those things so I can get excited about 7 or 8 games a year. I love the big games and hate the brunch time games. And most importantly recruiting. All the top high school kids think they are NFL good. As long as the SEC continues to dominate, you can sell the alpha dog guys on playing in the SEC vs Pros or in the BIG12 vs Joes. I realize the delta in reality is not as huge as the perception, but the difference is real and significant.
I really do think the SEC is head and shoulders above the other conferences, and I want credit for playing in those venues against those teams. Doesn't mean I like Bama, LSU, Auburn, or Mississippi State - I don't.
Not trying to be a prick with this response, just trying to explain my thinking.
I don't think there is a single guy on the Texas roster that is as good as his Alabama counter part. Maybe Dicker the kicker.
comparing the Texas defense to Bama is like comparing your right hand to a super model. One is the real deal, the other takes a lot of imagination.
I probably wasn't clear, I was talking about OU's tiny corners.
2013 Sugar Bowl - Pregame = Oklahoma has no chance to hang with superior athleticism of the SEC. OU 45 Alabama 31
2016 Sugar Bowl - Pregame = Oklahoma has no chance to hang with superior athleticism of the SEC OU 35 Auburn 19
2017 Rose Bowl. - Pregame = Oklahoma has no chance to hang with superior athleticism of the SEC. Georgia 54 Oklahoma 48
Really, really sick of hearing the "SEC is so much better than everybody else". Past results don't bear it out as truth.
But keep discounting OU because we're in the big XII MM42. Keep saying we have no chance against AL bro. That's how we want it.
This is exactly what I'm talking about and don't understand about the SEC thing with aggy. Why do you want the SEC to dominate? So you can brag that a&m plays in the supposed best conference? The continual put downs of other conferences is arrogant and comes across like aggy thinks that they're better because they play in the SEC. This is what aggys do non-stop and it is annoying to others and embarrassing for them.
BTW, I, as many others, don't think that the SEC is the best conference every year. Last year the Big 10 was the best conference. This year, I think that the SEC is about on par with the other P5 conferences. It ebbs and flows. The SEC has only been the dominate conference going back 10 or 12 years. It hasn't always been the conference. It may or may not continue to be considered the best conference in the future. There are no guarantees. And no, the SEC is not "head and shoulders above all of the other conferences".
It's hard to compare records with the SEC only playing eight conference games and getting four non-conference games, of which only one has to be a Div. 1-A school.Totally agree that the Big 10 was definitely the best conference last year. Still football, left to be played, but the SEC has been the best so far when you look at records and games among the P5 conferences. Big 12 or Big 10 are second, but a good bit behind. ACC has one elite team and a few other good ones. PAC 12 has no elite teams and a few good ones.
It's hard to compare records with the SEC only playing eight conference games and getting four non-conference games, of which only one has to be a Div. 1-A school.
It's hard to compare records with the SEC only playing eight conference games and getting four non-conference games, of which only one has to be a Div. 1-A school.