The reason we lost:

[Baguette]

100%. Ewers may have experience (throwing 1-2 interceptions per game), but he is not going to light up the scoreboard like a pinball machine to overcome those turnovers.

Arch, has started 2 games this season and finished 3 when QE got injured. Arch led the Horns down the field and scored TDs, instead of settling for FG opportunities.

Against lesser competion.

 

[oldhorn2]

Against lesser competion.

When you play against team crap, everything works. Then you play against team good where almost every player is stronger and faster....well, not so much

I don't discount the statement, but it is hard to compare results in that situation.

 

[Etlonghorn]

The idea of risking the career of a generational QB is mind boggling at best and insane at worst.

So, using Arch the way Sark did against aggy was mind boggling or insane?
We have a defense that is Championship level and an offense that is offensive in the red zone. I don't care about next year right now but since we're talking about risking the career of a generational QB, is there more risk of him getting injured when he's a pass or run option or just as a straight QB run?
IF Arch can add something for the defenses to at least think about because he's on the field then that WILL help QE run the offense. We're going to have to score 30+ to beat Oregon or Tennessee. We haven't broke 20 in the last 2 games. Something has to change.