Login to view embedded media
Taking a page out of Arkansas' playbook to slow us down.

Have not been this excited (measured) about the upcoming administration since Reagan


To my leftists friends

safe and secure border and streets
eliminate waste in our federal government
prioritize America's needs
stop wars and promote peace
attempt to take politics out of governing
return education to teaching core principles
leverage our strength for citizens not donor/political class
permanently end central bureaucracies
make government accountable to its citizens
equality not equity

To my Never Trumper friends
this opportunity would never have happened with Tim Scott, Nicki Haley or Mike Pence types ...E V E R
the backgrounds of the cabinet elect positions is transformational not traditional
what, if any of the above mentioned items ( Leftists friends list) do you find objectionable and why ?


and to my Trump allies
no, we don't worship Trump, he has plenty of faults just like us and most every living politician or human
no he is not perfect. just like everybody else

he is the only one making a committed case to get rid of the corruption and abhorrent wastefulness in Washington , that's why he got elected


the only way to intellectually defeat or even argue with this movement is to make the case that the list isn't real and there is somehow an ulterior aim of the administration
to justify the status quo is to accept the dishonest politically powered movement towards central rule and governance

At this point, all you can do is laugh.

I get it - overhauling the Department of Education and trying something new. A fresh apporach. Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Green - I don't care. But what qualifications does she have?

All you can really do at this juncture is laugh

The college football world can piss and moan about it all day long, and they will if we drop another game. But make no mistake, we are a lock for the playoff at 10-2. The University of Texas when eligible to be featured in post season play, simply does not get left out if there is not a hard rule in place that keeps us out (2008 as example).

Edit: By "piss and moan" I meant extrapolating a bunch of random strength of schedule data, comparisons, etc. None of that will matter in the end because when push comes to shove, and the powers that be have the opportunity to put Texas in, they always do.

And funny

Login to view embedded media

How different is this offense if he doesn’t go down? Not having a reliable hammer between the tackles who can be trusted in pass pro feels like it’s been a big void all season. Looking back I don’t think most of us appreciated the full impact of losing him. Most of us took the “that sucks and hope for a quick and full recovery for CJ but it’s RB so next man up and we will be fine” approach when the news of his injury broke. At this point I think it’s apparent we undervalued what he brings to the table.

That said, how is his recovery coming @Ketchum @Anwar Richardson? Also wondering about Clark’s.

For those thinking a 2-loss Texas will be left out of playoffs, here is a list of game results that would ensure our inclusion or greatly benefit our chances even if only one of them occurs.

Lots of football left to play. Unlikely the favorite will win all of them. Only included games that are at least reasonably plausible. Beating A&M gets us in even with UK loss.

That being said, just win out! Hook ‘em

This weekend:
Florida over Ole Miss
Army over Notre Dame
OU over Alabama
Auburn over Texas A&M
Minnesota over Penn St
Blow out win for Ohio St over Indiana

Final weekend:
Miss St over Ole Miss
Georgia Tech over Georgia
USC over Notre Dame
Vanderbilt over Tennessee
Auburn over Alabama
Maryland over Penn St

Per my aggy student.
I literally have no words.

I realize this is a pick your poison question…. But just curious who would you rather have as our coach?

Shaka was terrible here, but very good / great other places.

RT has been mediocre here and everywhere.


Which is better?

Nasdaq crossed into correction and Dow down 850 points.

That's my opinion. Here are a few details on Gaetz and his SUPPOSED issues:

The story behind the accusations against Matt Gaetz that no one is talking about​

This is the start of an ongoing, provocative thread that will no doubt evolve daily. You won't see the MSM covering many of these stories.

They have a vested interest in ignoring them which creates shielded truth and even censorship - never a good thing.

At the same time, it has created the true need for a truth hammer and that is where we begin this effort.

Edit: Recent censoring efforts and cancel culture narratives have served as evidence of this need since ours is a two-sided system that has been infiltrated by tyrranical scumbag marxists bent on one party rule.

EDIT: Did "Truth Social" copy this idea?

Login to view embedded media

Venables is becoming publicly tilted about the Fasusi situation and it’s starting to feel like this might be the final nail. Very similar to Herman losing Quinn which ended up being the final nail for him.

So yesterday my youngest daughter turned 17 and I got her a turntable for vinyl albums. She’s collected a few albums over the years just for the album covers.
So it tugged at my heart when the first album she chose to play was Dark Side of the Moon. Then she went into my stack that’s been sitting in my media room gathering dust and pulled out my original Van Halen 1 that I bought when it originally came out and hasn’t seen daylight in over 30 years. Brought back memories and tears. We just sat around and listened like we teenagers did back in the 70 and 80’s, and going over and over the album jacket.

So my question to you knuckleheads is “What would be your first album choice to play?”

Post CFP Show - Media Teleconference Q/A w/Committee Executive Richard Clark

Q: Why is Texas ahead of Georgia?
A: "The overall body of work, with a Top 5 defense and their Quarterback leading this top 20 offense. Georgia did struggle with Ole Miss at Ole Miss but did have a nice win over Tennessee this week."

Q: Was there a discussion of moving Georgia up further based on where Texas is (being a top 3 road win).
A: "We really had a long debate as a committee, with Ole Miss, Georgia, Miami, and Alabama. Very small margins in terms of things we are looking at and comparing over the last couple of days."

Q: The Ranking of BYU at 14?
A: "Close win against SMU, great win against Kansas State with close wins over Utah and Oklahoma State. The tough loss at home against Kansas, it's something the committee has been monitoring all along, we don't penalize teams for winning close or winning to big, we penalize them for losing."

Q: What are you looking for in the Ohio State vs. Indiana game this week, especially the loser down the road?
A: "We're looking at a lot of variables, how the Offense and Defense play - what are their streaks as far as in each half, the consistency of performance. We will assess no matter if they win or lose, the same way. In terms of who loses and how that impacts the rankings, that is to be determined."

Q: Four SEC Teams that have 2 losses and all played each other, what's the weak point in Tennessee resume?
A: "1. they just had the loss at Georgia, and the also have the loss at Arkansas - They are a really good team with a top defense, but we are splitting hairs between Tennessee, Georgia, Ole Miss and Alabama. They have beat each other at different times, so we have to look at Alabama over the last 3 games (LSU, Missouri, Mercer), we were very impressed with there win at LSU. So we will continue to monitor all of these teams as the season goes on."

Q: Assessment of Notre Dame
A: "Riley Leonard has really come into his own, they had a great opening win against Texas A&M, they had a great win against Navy and we are impressed with how they have bounced back since that loss, they have really come on strong."

Q: How does the committee view South Carolina and Clemson, who play in two weeks?
A: "Clemson bounced back after Louisville with wins against Virginia Tech and Pittsburgh, Klubnik has handled this offense very well, as well as South Carolina"

Q: Mountain West Conference - thoughts on Boise getting that 4 Seed and UNLV being ranked?
A1: "they have performed very well against their schedule, it started with a 3-point loss to Oregon. For us, you look at what Ashton Jeanty has done, leading the country in rushing - being a great solid team in performance and the committee has been impressed with their performance."
A2: "Two close losses for UNLV, OT vs Syracuse, and a close loss to Boise State, their Quarterback has been impressive and despite not being the top 2 in their league, we have been impressed by UNLV."

Q: Georgia Ranking vs. SEC.
A: "It's hard as we look at all of these teams, they all play different schedules. It's not the fault of a team that doesn't play better opponent, these conferences have changed in size so some teams are missing out on tougher games, so even without the SOS, we have to rely on who they are playing and how they are playing them. We look at it holistically, SOS is an important data point for us, but it's not the only data point. Georgia had a great game against Tennessee, so we will continue to monitor them for the rest of the season. Head to Head losses against Ole Miss and Alabama (whom they are behind in the rankings)."

Q: Penn State vs. Alabama Rankings while looking at SOS
A: "Given they are playing different schedules in any given week. (SOS, Who they are playing, Where are they playing, Where is an opponent ranked?), it's not cut and dry. If it was just about SOS, the rankings would look much different. All teams can do is play who is in front of them and the committee has to evaluate and react to that, it's not something we take lightly, it's not easy. We take a hard look at it everything."

Next week's rankings will be released at 7:00 pm Central on Tuesday, November 26th



Big Week 13 Games with Impact on the Playoff
- 2. Ohio State vs. 5. Indiana
- 3. Texas vs. Kentucky
- 6. Notre Dame vs 19. Army
- 7. Alabama at Oklahoma (Night Game in SEC)
- 9. Ole Miss @ Florida (just defeated LSU)
- 14. BYU @ 21. Arizona State
- 15. Texas A&M @ Auburn (Night Game in SEC)
- 16. Colorado @ Kansas (just defeated BYU)

Big Week 14 Games with Impact on the Playoff
- 1. Oregon vs. Washington
- 2. Ohio State vs. Michigan
- 3. Texas @ 15. Texas A&M
- 6. Notre Dame @ USC
- 7. Alabama vs. Auburn
- 9. Ole Miss vs. Mississippi State - Friday
- 11. Tennessee @ Vanderbilt
- 10. Georgia vs. Georgia Tech - Friday
- 12. Boise State vs. Oregon State - Friday
- 16. Colorado vs. Oklahoma State - Friday
- 17. Clemson vs. 18. South Carolina

Projected Conference Title Games with Impact on the Playoff (on 11/19)
B10 - 1. Oregon vs. 2. Ohio State (Indiana with a chance)
SEC - 3. Texas vs. 7. Alabama (Georgia, Ole Miss, Tennessee, Texas A&M with a chance)
ACC - 8. Miami vs. 13. SMU (Clemson with a chance)
MWC - 12. Boise State vs. Colorado State (UNLV with a chance)
B12 - 14. BYU vs. 16. Colorado (Arizona State, Iowa State with a chance)
AAC - 19. Army vs. 20. Tulane

Here I am again ...

I'm going to be on campus before the Kentucky game stalking (stocking) recruits. If anyone has a parking pass they're not going to be using, I could use the assist there.

Also, my daughters are absolutely obsessed with UT football games now. I guess that's a good thing, except they hound me every single game for tickets. Anyone got any tix their willing to part with, maybe for a creative exchange for some free time on OB (what's more valuable than that?!?!).

Thanks in advance!

1 Light purple parking pass for on San jac parking Saturday for Kentucky game. Will be coming in from Dallas morning of game so can pick up in Dallas this week or
Meet in Austin on my way in around 11.

$100

Text me at (214) 326-6524 if interested

Where is this headed? Seems bizarre, but no surprise, beginning with Muellar Investigation. Is it just wanting a no-cost Trump Hotel in Moscow? Tulsi Gabbart seems almost like a Russian asset. I don’t get it.

Per Fanduel

-20.5 against Kentucky (Implied 90+% chance to win)
-7.5 against Ags (Implied 73% chance to win)

Implied ~38% chance to win SEC

Implied ~88% chance to make the playoff

Implied ~15% chance to win the whole thing

Row 71 with chair backs and Disch Falk parking

$400 for package

Context, context and more context.

When regularly posting Quinn Ewers quarter by quarter numbers (for years), I've found some pushback in the last few weeks from those that feel like it's not a set of data points that bring a lot of value.

My response to those criticisms is to point out that I think the numbers properly point out how high Ewers' highs are and how low his lows are. Since coming back from injury, Ewers has been an elite player when he's been on and really poor when he's been off.

But, what does it mean without more context? It's a fair question.

Therefore, in an effort to provide context that might be missing, I decided to take a look at the last 20 quarters of play from the likes of Oregon's Dillon Gabriel, Miami's Cam Ward, Colorado's Shedeur Sanders, Ole Miss' Jaxson Dart, Ohio State's Will Howard, Indiana's Kurtis Rourke, Penn State's Drew Allar and SMU's Kevin Jennings in hopes of providing clearer picture of what the data shows.

Honestly, the data points out exactly what I've been trying to stress in recent weeks. Let's take a look at it.

Most quarters of sub-100 ratings play

1. Ewers (9)
2T. Dart (5)
2T. Sanders (5)
2T. Ward (5)
5T. Gabriel (3)
5T Howard (3)
7. Jennings (3)
8T. Allar (2)
8T. Rourke (2)

* Note: Ewers, Gabriel, Ward, Sanders, Dart, Howard and Jennings all have 1 sub-100 quarter ratings that occurred in the 4th quarter of games that their teams were running out the clock

Most games of multi-quarter sub-100 ratings play

1, Ewers (4)
2T. Dart (1)
2T. Howard (1)
2T. Jennings (1)
2T. Sanders (1)
2T. Ward (1)
7T. Allar (0)
7T. Gabriel (0)
7T. Rourke (0)

* Note: Each of Ewers, Sanders, Dart and Howard had multi-quarter games that included 4th quarters where they were running the clock out if runaway wins.

Most Quarters Without Offensive Touchdowns

1. Dart (11)
2. Ewers (9)
3. Allar (8)
4. Sanders (7)
5T. Gabriel (6)
5T. Howard (6)
7T. Jennings (5)
7T. Ward (5)
9. Rourke (4)

Most 160+ ratings

1T. Howard (13)
1T. Rourke (13)
1T. Sanders (13)
4T. Gabriel (10)
4T. Jennings (10)
4T. Ward (10)
7T. Allar (9)
7T. Dart (9)
9. Ewers (8)

Most 200+ ratings

1. Howard (9)
2T. Ewers (7)
2T. Jennings (7)
4. Rourke (6)
5T. Allar (5)
5T. Gabriel (5)
5T. Sanders (5)
8T. Dart (4)
8T. Ward (4)

**********************

Here's a look at the player by player breakdowns.

Quinn Ewers

OU 1st Q: 3 of 5 for 13 yards, OT, 1 INT (41.8 rating) (0 points)
OU 2nd Q: 10 of 12 for 109 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (181.7 rating) (21 points)
OU 3rd Q: 5 of 9 for 71 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (121.8 rating) (3 points)
OU 4th Q: 2 of 3 for 6 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (6.4 rating) (7 points)

Georgia 1Q: 5 of 8 for 17 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (80.4 rating) (0 points)
Georgia 2Q: 1 of 4 for 0 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (-25.00) (0 points)
Georgia 3Q: 7 of 10 for 90 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT (211.6 rating) (15 points)
Georgia 4Q: 12 of 21 for 104 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (98.7 rating) (0 points)

Vandy 1Q: 12 of 13 for 126 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT (201.3 rating) (14 points)
Vandy 2Q: 7 of 8 for 85 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (218.0 rating) (7 points)
Vandy 3Q: 6 of 9 for 39 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (80.8 rating) (3 points)
Vandy 4Q: 2 of 7 for 36 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (71.8 rating) (3 points)

Florida 1Q: 7 of 10 for 104 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT (223.4 rating) (14 points)
Florida 2Q: 10 of 15 for 193 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT (221.0 rating) (21 points)
Florida 3Q: 2 of 2 for 36 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (416.2 rating) (7 points)
Florida 4Q: DNP

Arkansas 1Q: 6 of 9 for 48 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (148.1 rating) (7 points)
Arkansas 2Q: 9 of 14 for 52 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (95.5 rating) (3 points)
Arkansas 3Q: 1 of 4 for 30 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (88.0 rating) (3 points)
Arkansas 4Q: 4 of 5 for 46 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (223.3 rating) (7 points)

Number of sub-100 rating quarters: 9
Number of multi sub-100 quarters in a game: 4
Number of 4th quarter sub-100 games (finishing off opponent): 1 (OU)
Number of quarters without TDs: 9
Number of 160+ rating quarters: 8
Number of 200+ rating quarters: 7

Dillon Gabriel (Oregon)

PURD 1Q: 7 of 8 for 115 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (208.25) (14 points)
PURD 2Q: 8 of 10 for 108 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT (183.72) (7 points)
PURD 3Q: 4 of 7 for 44 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (109.94) (0 points)
PURD 4Q: 2 of 2 for 20 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT(349.0) (14 points)

ILL 1Q: 8 of 12 for 125 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT (209.17) (14 points)
ILL 2Q: 8 of 8 for 121 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (268.30) (21 points)
ILL 3Q: 1 of 3 for 29 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (114.13) (0 points)
ILL 4Q: 1 of 3 for 16 yards 0 TD, 1 INT (11.47) (3 points)

MICH 1Q: 8 of 10 for 71 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (172.64) (7 points)
MICH 2Q: 8 of 12 for 144 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (167.47) (21 points)
MICH 3Q: 3 of 7 for 12 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (57.26) (3 points)
MICH 4Q: 3 of 5 for 65 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (169.20) (7 points)

MARY 1Q: 7 of 11 for 65 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (113.27) (7 points)
MARY 2Q: 8 of 10 for 63 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (165.92) (7 points)
MARY 3Q: 5 of 8 for 31 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (136.30) (7 points)
MARY 4Q: 3 of 4 for 24 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (207.90) (10 points)

WISC 1Q: 12 of 16 for 102 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (116.5) (6 points)
WISC 2Q: 3 of 5 for 26 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (103.68) (0 points)
WISC 3Q: 4 of 7 for 31 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (84.34) (0 points)
WISC 4Q: 3 of 4 for 35 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (148.50) (10 points)

Number of sub-100 rating quarters: 3
Number of multi sub-100 quarters in a game: 0
Number of 4th quarter sub-100 games (finishing off opponent): 1 (Illinois)
Number of quarters without TDs: 6
Number of 160+ rating quarters: 10
Number of 200+ rating quarters: 5

Cam Ward (Miami)

Cal 1Q: 6 of 7 for 53 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (149.31) (7 points)
CAL 2Q: 6 of 11 for 56 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (97.31) (3 points)
CAL 3Q: 8 of 13 for 64 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (97.51) (8 points)
CAL 4Q: 15 of 22 for 238 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT (189.05) (21 points)

LOU 1Q: 6 of 9 for 70 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (168.67) (10 points)
LOU 2Q: 3 of 6 for 73 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (207.20) (7 points)
LOU 3Q: 8 of 11 for 96 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT (206.04) (14 points)
LOU 4Q: 4 of 6 for 80 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (178.67) (14 points)

FSU 1Q: 7 of 10 for 77 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (134.68) (7 points)
FSU 2Q: 4 of 8 for 52 yards. 0 YD, 0 INT (104.6) (10 points)
FSU 3Q: 7 of 10 for 56 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (117.04) (6 points)
FSU 4Q: 3 of 5 for 20 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (93.6) (13 points)

DUKE 1Q: 10 of 17 for 121 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT (157.44) (14 points)
DUKE 2Q: 1 of 6 for 2 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (19.47) (3 points)
DUKE 3Q: 7 of 9 for 72 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (181.64) (15 points)
DUKE 4Q: 6 of 8 for 180 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT (321.50) (21 points)

GT 1Q: 3 of 6 for 109 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (257.60) (10 points)
GT 2Q: 6 of 12 for 26 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (68.20) (0 points)
GT 3Q: 6 of 8 for 64 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (183.45) (6 points)
GT 4Q: 10 of 13 for 151 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (199.88) (7 points)

Number of sub-100 rating quarters: 5
Number of multi sub-100 quarters in a game: 1
Number of 4th quarter sub-100 games (finishing off opponent): 1 (FSU)
Number of quarters without TDs: 5
Number of 160+ rating quarters: 10
Number of 200+ rating quarters: 4

Shedeur Sanders (Colorado)

KSU 1Q: 5 of 6 for 61 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (223.73) (7 points)
KSU 2Q: 9 of 9 for 91 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (184.93) (0 points)
KSU 3Q: 6 of 7 for 75 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (222.86) (7 points)
KSU 4Q: 13 of 17 for 161 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT (175.44) (14 points)

ARIZ 1Q: 6 of 6 for 77 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (262.80) (14 points)
ARIZ 2Q: 9 of 15 for 97 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT (127.80) (14 points)
ARIZ 3Q: 5 of 5 for 50 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (184.0) (3 points)
ARIZ 4Q: 3 of 7 for 27 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (46.69) (3 points)

CIN 1Q: 10 of 10 for 118 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (232.12) (14 points)
CIN 2Q: 8 of 12 for 113 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (173.27) (10 points)
CIN 3Q: 4 of 6 for 51 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (138.07) (3 points)
CIN 4Q: 3 of 4 for 53 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (186.3) (3 points)

TECH 1Q: 3 of 7 for 27 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (75.26) (0 points)
TECH 2Q: 10 of 13 for 120 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (179.85) (10 points)
TECH 3Q: 12 of 15 for 132 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT (197.92) (21 points)
TECH 4Q: 5 of 9 for 28 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (81.69) (0 points)

UTAH 1Q: 4 of 7 for 63 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT (161.31) (7 points)
UTAH 2Q: 14 of 19 for 108 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (138.80) (7 points)
UTAH 3Q: 5 of 9 for 31 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (84.49) (7 points)
UTAH 4Q: 7 of 8 for 144 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (279.95) (21 points)

Number of sub-100 rating quarters: 5
Number of multi sub-100 quarters in a game: 1
Number of 4th quarter sub-100 games (finishing off opponent): 1 (Tech)
Number of quarters without TDs: 7
Number of 160+ rating quarters: 13
Number of 200+ rating quarters: 5

Jaxson Dart (Ole Miss)

SC 1Q: 9 of 13 for 107 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (138.37) (14 points)
SC 2Q: 5 of 8 for 120 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (188.50) (10 points)
SC 3Q: 2 of 8 for 79 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (107.9) (3 points)
SC 4Q: 0 of 1 for 0 yards, 0 YD, 0 INT (0.00) (0 points)

LSU 1 Q: 6 of 8 for 94 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (173.70) (0 points)
LSU 2Q: 7 of 9 for 63 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (173.24) (17 points)
LSU 3Q: 7 of 13 for 69 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (98.43) (3 points)
LSU 4Q: 4 of 8 for 60 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (113.0) (0 points)

OU 1Q: 3 of 8 for 58 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (98.4) (7 points)
OU 2Q: 5 of 5 for 61 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (202.38) (3 points)
OU 3Q: 10 of 11 for 189 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (265.24) (13 points)
OU 4Q: 4 for 6 for 7 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (76.47) (3 points)

ARK 1Q: 8 of 11 for 94 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (144.51) (0 points)
ARK 2Q: 10 of 12 for 227 yards, 4 TD, 0 INT (352.24) (28 points)
ARK 3Q: 6 of 7 for 184 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT (400.80) (21 points)
ARK 4Q: 1 of 1 for 8 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (167.20) (0 points)

UGA 1Q: 5 for 7 for 83 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (142.6) (3 points)
UGA 2Q: 4 of 7 for 48 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (114.73) (6 points)
UGA 3Q: 4 of 7 for 68 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (185.89) (7 points)
UGA 4Q: 0 of 1 for 0 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (0.0) (6 points)

Number of sub-100 rating quarters: 5
Number of multi sub-100 quarters in a game: 1
Number of 4th quarter sub-100 games (finishing off opponent): 1 (UGA)
Number of quarters without TDs: 11
Number of 160+ rating quarters: 9
Number of 200+ rating quarters: 4

Will Howard (Ohio State)

ORE 1Q: 6 of 9 for 66 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (128.27) (7 points)
ORE 2Q: 6 of 7 for 63 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (208.46) (14 points)
ORE 3Q: 5 of 5 for 88 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (313.84) (7 points)
ORE 4Q: 10 of 14 for 109 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (138.83) (3 points)

NEB 1Q: 6 of 6 for 81 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (268.40) (7 points)
NEB 2Q: 3 of 3 for 86 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (450.80) (7 points)
NEB 3Q: 1 of 4 for 5 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (35.50) (0 points)
NEB 4Q: 3 of 3 for 49 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (347.20) (7 points)

PST 1Q: 5 for 7 for 64 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT (165.60) (7 points)
PST 2Q: 5 of 9 for 76 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (165.96) (7 points)
PST 3Q: 4 of 4 for 38 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (179.80) (3 points)
PST 4Q: 2 of 4 for 26 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (104.60) (0 points)

PUR 1Q: 2 of 4 for 32 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (117.2) (7 points)
PUR 2Q: 9 of 10 for 89 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT (230.76) (14 points)
PUR 3Q: 8 of 10 for 97 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (161.48) (10 points)
PUR 4Q: 2 of 2 for 42 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (441.40) (7 points)

NW 1Q: 3 of 5 for 19 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (91.92) (0 points)
NW 2Q: 6 of 9 for 119 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (203.28) (21 points)
NW 3Q: 4 of 5 for 97 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (308.96) (10 points)
NW 4Q: 2 for 6 for 12 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (50.13) (0 points)

Number of sub-100 rating quarters: 3
Number of multi sub-100 quarters in a game: 1
Number of 4th quarter sub-100 games (finishing off opponent): 1 (Northwestern)
Number of quarters without TDs: 6
Number of 160+ rating quarters: 13
Number of 200+ rating quarters: 9

Kurtis Rourke (Indiana)

MARY 1Q: 8 of 12 for 105 yards, 0 TD, 2 INT (106.83) (0 points)
MARY 2Q: 5 of 7 for 90 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (226.57) (14 points)
MARY 3Q: 5 of 10 for 97 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (164.98) (14 points)
MARY 4Q: 4 of 4 for 80 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (350.50) (7 points)

NW 1Q: 9 of 10 for 104 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (177.36) (7 points)
NW 2Q: 5 of 8 for 95 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (203.50) (10 points)
NW 3Q: 5 of 6 for 106 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (286.53) (7 points)
NW 4Q: 6 of 9 for 88 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (185.47) (17 points)

NEB 1Q: 8 of 9 for 61 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (145.92) (7 points)
NEB 2Q: 9 of 12 for 130 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT (176.82) (21 points)
NEB 3Q: DNP
NEB 4Q: DNP

MSU 1Q: 3 of 6 for 29 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (90.60) (0 points)
MSU 2Q: 8 of 10 for 110 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT (238.40) (21 points)
MSU 3Q: 7 of 9 for 113 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (219.91) (10 points)
MSU 4Q: 1 of 3 for 11 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (174.13) (14 points)

MICH 1Q: 6 of 8 for 69 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (188.70) (7 points)
MICH 2Q: 8 of 11 for 123 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (196.65) (10 points)
MICH 3Q: 0 of 4 for 0 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (-50.00) (0 points)
MICH 4Q: 3 of 5 for 24 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (100.32) (3 points)

Number of sub-100 rating quarters: 2
Number of multi sub-100 quarters in a game: 0
Number of 4th quarter sub-100 games (finishing off opponent): 0
Number of quarters without TDs: 4
Number of 160+ rating quarters: 13
Number of 200+ rating quarters: 6

Drew Allar (Penn State)

USC 1Q: 7 of 8 for 68 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (158.90) (3 points)
USC 2Q: 5 of 10 for 58 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (78.72) (3 points)
USC 4Q: 12 of 13 for 192 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT (225.37) (14 points)
USC 4Q: 5 of 11 for 62 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT (104.62) (10 points)

WISC 1Q: 9 of 10 for 113 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (184.92) (0 points)
WISC 2Q: 5 of 8 for 35 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (140.50) (7 points)
WISC 3Q: DNP
WISC 4Q: DNP

OSU 1Q: 3 of 5 for 30 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (110.4) (3 points)
OSU 2Q: 4 of 9 for 34 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (53.96) (0 points)
OSU 3Q: 5 of 5 for 53 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (189.04) (3 points)
OSU 4Q: 1 of 2 for 41 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (222.20) (0 points)

WASH 1Q: 2 of 3 for 25 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (164.67) (7 points)
WASH 2Q: 12 of 15 for 115 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (166.40) (21 points)
WASH 3Q: 2 of 4 for 42 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (138.20) (0 points)
WASH 4Q: 4 of 6 for 38 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (119.87) (7 points)

PUR 1Q: 11 of 12 for 128 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT (236.27) (14 points)
PUR 2Q: 2 of 2 for 42 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (276.40) (7 points)
PUR 3Q: 4 of 5 for 81 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (282.08) (7 points)
PUR 4Q: DNP

Number of sub-100 rating quarters: 2
Number of multi sub-100 quarters in a game: 0
Number of 4th quarter sub-100 games (finishing off opponent): 0
Number of quarters without TDs: 8
Number of 160+ rating quarters: 9
Number of 200+ rating quarters: 5

Kelvin Jennings (SMU)

LOU 1Q: 8 of 8 for 106 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (211.30) (14 points)
LOU 2Q: 5 of 7 for 41 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (120.63) (10 points)
LOU 3Q: 3 of 4 for 67 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (215.70) (3 points)
LOU 4Q: 5 of 8 for 65 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (130.75) (7 points)

STAN 1Q: 6 of 8 for 204 yards, 3 TD, 0 INT (412.95) (21 points)
STAN 2Q: 6 of 9 for 74 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (113.51) (10 points)
STAN 3Q: 3 of 5 for 25 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (102.00) (0 points)
STAN 4Q: 3 of 4 for 30 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (138.00) (9 points)

DUKE 1Q: 5 of 6 for 64 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (186.93) (0 points)
DUKE 2Q: 3 of 8 for 29 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (42.95) (14 points)
DUKE 3Q: 5 of 6 for 166 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (370.73) (7 points)
DUKE 4Q: 0 of 4 for 0 yards, 0 TD, 2 INT (-100.00) (0 points)

PITT 1Q: 8 of 12 for 121 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (151.37) (7 points)
PITT 2Q: 4 of 5 for 49 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (228.32) (24 points)
PITT 3Q: 2 of 5 for 9 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT (55.10) (3 points)
PITT 4Q: 4 of 4 for 137 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (470.20) (7 points)

BC 1Q: 10 of 13 for 113 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (175.32) (10 points)
BC 2Q: 5 of 7 for 81 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT (140.06) (10 points)
BC 3Q: 5 of 7 for 77 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (210.97) (11 points)
BC 4Q: 4 of 6 for 28 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (160.87) (7 points)

Number of sub-100 rating quarters: 3
Number of multi sub-100 quarters in a game: 1
Number of 4th quarter sub-100 games (finishing off opponent): 1 (Duke)
Number of quarters without TDs: 5
Number of 160+ rating quarters: 10
Number of 200+ rating quarters: 7

Anyone have a navy blue parking pass they for some reason aren’t using? 👀 pretty much willing to pay anything (within reason 😂)

Anyone have a navy blue parking pass they for some reason aren’t using? 👀 pretty much willing to pay anything (within reason 😂)