I didn't see it but I just saw the score. Apparently Miami dominated from start to finish and Jimmy Butler came up huge give him credit. Game 7 NBA finals on the road.Well, glad I didn’t put money on it. I’d have lost my ass.
No, the game was definitely physical back then. But I just believe it is over romanticized about how physical it actually was.As in "the game wasn't as physical as it was made out to be"?
Or as in "it was sometimes too physical and that took away from the art and beauty of the game"?
I don't need to watch highlights. I grew up in the late 70's and 80's and watched plenty of basketball.No, it was real. No hype of romanticization. Here's an example of what we mean. Kevin McHale clotheslines Kurt Rambis in the 1984 Finals. Today this would be a Flagrant 2 foul with an automatic ejaculation and 1 game suspension without pay. You know what the actual call was on this play? This was a simple common foul. Two free throws and the game moved on. Nothing else.
Back then, there was a "no layup" rule that was common from the NBA all the way to HS ball. Teams were coached to never give up a layup under any circumstances and if you didn't you were considered a pvssy by your teammates, coaches and opponents. That's why the game was so physical and why I will always be convinced that Michael Jordan was the greatest of all time. Not even close. He had guys beating up on him night in and night out and he still beat their sorry asses. You remember the "Jordan Rules"? Every team was coached to bump him, hold him, grab him, elbow him, knee him, whatever it took to try and disrupt his game. It never worked. The guy just played and beat you. No whining to the refs, the media or anyone else. He just beat you and went home. Unlike all the bitches today like Lebron who believe they should have a different set of rules just for them.
I don't disagree that the sharp shooters would definitely be a hand full early in the series.No, the game was definitely physical back then. But I just believe it is over romanticized about how physical it actually was.
You put that 2017 Warriors team up against any of those teams from the 80's and 90's and they beat them in a 7 game series. Skill beats physicality any day in basketball.
That's the thing, that Warriors team would beat you from the outside and wouldn't have to get into the paint. Look, I loved watching basketball in the 80's and 90's as that was the era I grew up in. I just think the physicality gets a little over hyped from that era is all.I don't disagree that the sharp shooters would definitely be a hand full early in the series.
But it becomes really hard to shoot with a sprained wrist, jammed middle finger, twisted ankle, and hyperextended knee- which is what most of them would have after about game 3.
I just don't see today's point guards penetrating the lane on a guy like Ewing or Rodman and nor walking away with some bruises.
I grew up in the same era. It was far more physical and demanding back then. Shooters had a very difficult time getting open because of the holding and pushing that was allowed on the perimeter. No way Klay or Steph would get the open looks like they do today. Because today you’re not allowed to hold or push guys who are trying to get open. It’s a foul today but it wasn’t a foul in the 80’s. The “hand check” rules were instituted in the late 90’s to make the game more pleasant to watch and to increase scoring. Back then, teams had a hell of a time to score 90 points. Especially in the playoffs where scores were sometimes in the 70’s and 80’sI don't need to watch highlights. I grew up in the late 70's and 80's and watched plenty of basketball.
Amen. Watch the hand checking in that era. Doesn't matter how quick you are if the defender just "guides" you away from the goal.I grew up in the same era. It was far more physical and demanding back then. Shooters had a very difficult time getting open because of the holding and pushing that was allowed on the perimeter. No way Klay or Steph would get the open looks like they do today. Because today you’re not allowed to hold or push guys who are trying to get open. It’s a foul today but it wasn’t a foul in the 80’s. The “hand check” rules were instituted in the late 90’s to make the game more pleasant to watch and to increase scoring. Back then, teams had a hell of a time to score 90 points. Especially in the playoffs where scores were sometimes in the 70’s and 80’s
Today it’s common for teams to score in the 120’s because of the way the game is called. Fans wanted more scoring and less ground and pound defense.
Kind of like this great physical defense?? Teams had a hell of a time scoring because there was maybe 3 to 3 guys on a team that could shoot the basketball. Now everybody from the 1 to the 5 can shoot the ball. Like I said, that era of basketball is over romanticized.I grew up in the same era. It was far more physical and demanding back then. Shooters had a very difficult time getting open because of the holding and pushing that was allowed on the perimeter. No way Klay or Steph would get the open looks like they do today. Because today you’re not allowed to hold or push guys who are trying to get open. It’s a foul today but it wasn’t a foul in the 80’s. The “hand check” rules were instituted in the late 90’s to make the game more pleasant to watch and to increase scoring. Back then, teams had a hell of a time to score 90 points. Especially in the playoffs where scores were sometimes in the 70’s and 80’s
Today it’s common for teams to score in the 120’s because of the way the game is called. Fans wanted more scoring and less ground and pound defense.
It's funny because in the clip, Hubie Brown is flat out saying that nobody is playing any defense-- like they normally would play.Kind of like this great physical defense?? Teams had a hell of a time scoring because there was maybe 3 to 3 guys on a team that could shoot the basketball. Now everybody from the 1 to the 5 can shoot the ball. Like I said, that era of basketball is over romanticized.
These are 2 of the best teams of the 70's 80's and 90's and look how pathetic that defense is.
It's widely accepted that Tim Duncan is the greatest power forward ever to play. Even Charles Barkley said so.Amen. Watch the hand checking in that era. Doesn't matter how quick you are if the defender just "guides" you away from the goal.
Kind of like this great physical defense?? Teams had a hell of a time scoring because there was maybe 3 to 3 guys on a team that could shoot the basketball. Now everybody from the 1 to the 5 can shoot the ball. Like I said, that era of basketball is over romanticized.
These are 2 of the best teams of the 70's 80's and 90's and look how pathetic that defense is.
Exactly. Joe Dumars was the best perimeter defender in those days. He was the master of using the arm bar to guide opponents towards his shot blockers and enforcers in the paintAmen. Watch the hand checking in that era. Doesn't matter how quick you are if the defender just "guides" you away from the goal.
Not only a Westbrook fan, but apparently dumb enough to think he’s the GOAT??? 😂 That tweet lost all credibility before I could even read it,A tweet from a Russell Westbrook fan. Speaking of no defense 😂 😂 😂
WRL - your take doesn't look so stupid this morning. This is going to be a great series.Lambeer won two rings. Jokic will not win one.
Lol. Jokic is great. C’mon man. I just like giving Cali a hard time.WRL - your take doesn't look so stupid this morning. This is going to be a great series.
It's going to be good series wouldn't surprise if it goes 7. These teams matchup very well.Lol. Jokic is great. C’mon man. I just like giving Cali a hard time.
Chendall Weaver was another transfer from UTA. Kid was highly underrated coming out of high school and has tons of upside.So what does the roster currently look like?
Disu
Abmas-- dude is really good
Mitchell
Hunter
Brock
That transfer from Virginia
Somebody help me out. Front court looks good. Starting guards look solid. I'm forgetting a few
There's a lot of experience on this coming years roster as well. I'm skeptical about RT as a coach but I do feel like now that the dust has settled that he put a pretty decent roster together.this year's team had a lot of mental toughness, a lot of experience, a lot of those intangibles. as talented, not as talented-- whatever-- but that was a really special team. some may argue one disu injury away from a natty. we were close to the f4 as it was. i hope we're as good, but there are just certain things you can't know until a team has its feet held to the fire
That’s what I like about it though. We have seen it on the court.We'll see. Gotta see the proof on the court. So far it's been good.
You're in denial if you don't think 2 top 10 national recruits wouldn't have made this team better next year. Ron Holland is likely the number 1 overall pick in next years NBA draft. This roster is not as good without those 2 guys.That’s what I like about it though. We have seen it on the court.
Disu was one of the best players in the country last year, and I think we beat Miami if he had been 100%
The ORU transfer was the best player on a really good ORU team.
Hunter I don’t think was very good last year mostly but he’s capable of much more and I think we’ll see it.
This team has a track recorded individually that is very good. Now they’ll have to come together and do it, but I think RT can bring them together. A lot was made about losing the two big freshman recruits, but the reality is that the teams that win in college basketball these days are the ones with juniors and seniors. Not the ones with 5 star one and done freshmen.
Yeah. Except I didn’t say those guys wouldn’t have made the team better. I said the teams that win in college basketball today are not built around the 1 and done Freshman. To be honest with this group around him Ron holland would have been a monster, but Texas will have a good season and be a contender without himYou're in denial if you don't think 2 top 10 national recruits wouldn't have made this team better next year. Ron Holland is likely the number 1 overall pick in next years NBA draft. This roster is not as good without those 2 guys.
You're right, you didn't directly say it. But your last 2 sentences basically implied it...Yeah. Except I didn’t say those guys wouldn’t have made the team better. I said the teams that win in college basketball today are not built around the 1 and done Freshman. To be honest with this group around him Ron holland would have been a monster, but Texas will have a good season and be a contender without him
Thank you for admitting you were wrongYou're right, you didn't directly say it. But your last 2 sentences basically implied it...