ADVERTISEMENT

Biden fear mongering Covid hoax No. 2

My little brother-- he's a puss, but a tough little puss when he wants to be--

Has tested positive and I know he has had some blood pressure issues. He's down with a hundy fever and feels like he's dragging a sleigh. Was your buddy an "old school" buddy of yours from the 22-24?

The Isatis Root works well against the virus. I have tested positive for the anti bodies. It knocks the virus out by prohibiting replication and cell entry. I had the same virus as before recently and remembered that I had the Isatis Root. I took it again and the symptoms of virus were gone in 24 hours. Same for my family. They will still have congestion in some cases for a few days.

My 93 yo neighbor was out mowing her lawn the day of her vaccine and was dead the next day.

Proof
6 rows down and 10 rows down from top.

Fast 2 day standard delivery

https://www.newgreenusa.com/products/isatis-root-extract-ban-lan-gen-maximum-strength-500mg-60-capsules?currency=USD&variant=32589145089&utm_medium=cpc&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=Google Shopping

It's even better when combined with myricetin. I said over a year ago that it was effective as well and now it is unavailable. My only guess as to why the isatis root is available.... it grows like a Texas weed and the Chinese produce it. They aren't waiting on any government bennies to hit their accounts.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GuaranteedFresh!
Regardless of your opinions about covid, if you decide to get vaccinated you might take the Johnson & Johnson side effects seriously.
A buddy of mine had to get the poke inorder to to return to work. He got the J&J.
Within 24hrs he thought he was having a heart attack and went to the ER. He was placed on life support late last night. They're saying it doesn't look good. 41yrs old.

same with my sister. She got the J&J 4 months ago, and hasn’t been out of bed much since. Multiple EMS calls because she thought she was having a heart attack, and permanent dizziness. She’s still on sick leave, but nearing danger of losing her job over it. She’s 44, and sicker than if she’d actually gotten this overhyped flu strain.

F*ck the Covid hoax and any mealy mouthed, brain dead, c***sucker who propagates it.
 
It's an auto-immune response. He probably has had the bug and has the anti-bodies. Anyway, the jab changes one's RNA so that the body can recognize its own cells as foreign. His white blood cells are attacking his own organs.

https://citizenfreepress.com/column...sues-chilling-warning-on-covid-mrna-vaccines/

The msm does not cover these reactions and deaths so that it can be reported that the vaccine is 100% safe. Why are they pushing so hard when this is no more than a cold or less for 99% of people?
That makes more sense, who knows.

I'm very curious if that nasty bug we got around Oct-Nov '19 was actually covid or not. Ran a 104 fever then couldn't be more than a room away from a crapper for a week.

There's a study going on that I may participate in just to get a free antibodies test to find out. Take a look and tell me what you think if you get a chance.
 
That makes more sense, who knows.

I'm very curious if that nasty bug we got around Oct-Nov '19 was actually covid or not. Ran a 104 fever then couldn't be more than a room away from a crapper for a week.

There's a study going on that I may participate in just to get a free antibodies test to find out. Take a look and tell me what you think if you get a chance.
It wouldn't hurt. This gives Texas the ability to know who has the anti bodies and can prove heard immunity against any crap sleepy joe tries to pull in the future. Texas can give its residents proof of immunity beyond what the federal government is not willing to do. Good for Texas.
 
Regardless of your opinions about covid, if you decide to get vaccinated you might take the Johnson & Johnson side effects seriously.
A buddy of mine had to get the poke inorder to to return to work. He got the J&J.
Within 24hrs he thought he was having a heart attack and went to the ER. He was placed on life support late last night. They're saying it doesn't look good. 41yrs old.

Wish his fam could file some kind of lawsuit against his work. Absolute bullshit people are already requiring the vaccine in order to do things. It is beyond insane.
 
Does everyone here see what traitor Biden has done to this country in a mere 7 months? He wants total governmental control of all of our movements. And you stupid liberals on here are so freaking embarrassed of him, as is the rest of the country that you can't even defend him, nor do you attempt to even try. But thank goodness orange man is gone right? Tell us all again how Biden is "uniting" both sides. Chucklz.Imbeciles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Metcalf #2
ironic that after meeting with the Texas Democrat bunch a senior Pelosi aide and a White House Staffer have tested positive for Covid.

......so turns out the Dems playing hookie created a "super Spreader" event.....

proves there is a God after all....
 
ironic that after meeting with the Texas Democrat bunch a senior Pelosi aide and a White House Staffer have tested positive for Covid.

......so turns out the Dems playing hookie created a "super Spreader" event.....

proves there is a God after all....

These politicians either lied about getting the vaccine, or lied about the effectiveness.

IT IS TOO EARLY TO START REQUIRING PEOPLE TO HAVE IT TO GO PLACES!!! What in the hell do people not understand about this only being on the market for less than 9 months???
 
These politicians either lied about getting the vaccine, or lied about the effectiveness.

IT IS TOO EARLY TO START REQUIRING PEOPLE TO HAVE IT TO GO PLACES!!! What in the hell do people not understand about this only being on the market for less than 9 months???
I'm sure this is something that most everyone understands but when I see these statements I have to comment.

The vaccines don't create a force field around your body where no viral particles can enter. They can still enter your body like they do unvaccinated people. Once they are in your body, your bodies immune response kicks in. This happens in both vaccinated and unvaccinated people. The difference is in most vaccinated people, their body has already learned how to fight off the virus which allows it to do it much faster. The quicker response prevents the virus from replicating as many times and prevents infection or serious infection. In unvaccinated people the immune response is slower and the virus is able to replicate to much higher numbers which is more likely to create a serious infection. So in both cases a test can pick up viral particles in both vaccinated and unvaccinated people because the tests only detect whats there and not if you are necessarily infected or at what levels. The tests might even detect dead viral particles. So in short a test finding the virus should not be evidence that the vaccines are not effective.

The problem is they are testing people who have no symptoms or very mild, and claiming it as a case even though their immune system has already kicked its ass (applies for both vac and unvac). I have no idea why they still insist on testing people who are not sick. All it does is create more drama which this country doesn't need.
 
I hate to be the bearer of bad news here and everyone is certainly entitled to their own opinions and choices but to everyone here who has taken the so called "vaccine" should probably be alarmed by this. It's the never ending circle of fear they are hoping for to win elections and seize ultimate control of everyone's life.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html
 
Check this out. We're now at the point where we have more deaths from Covid vaccines than from Covid.

Well, yeah but that's taking backseat billing to the "new cases of Delta variant" in the U.S. Chucklz. They're like a well oiled machine. They have a plandemic for every occasion.
 
I'm sure this is something that most everyone understands but when I see these statements I have to comment.

The vaccines don't create a force field around your body where no viral particles can enter. They can still enter your body like they do unvaccinated people. Once they are in your body, your bodies immune response kicks in. This happens in both vaccinated and unvaccinated people. The difference is in most vaccinated people, their body has already learned how to fight off the virus which allows it to do it much faster. The quicker response prevents the virus from replicating as many times and prevents infection or serious infection. In unvaccinated people the immune response is slower and the virus is able to replicate to much higher numbers which is more likely to create a serious infection. So in both cases a test can pick up viral particles in both vaccinated and unvaccinated people because the tests only detect whats there and not if you are necessarily infected or at what levels. The tests might even detect dead viral particles. So in short a test finding the virus should not be evidence that the vaccines are not effective.

The problem is they are testing people who have no symptoms or very mild, and claiming it as a case even though their immune system has already kicked its ass (applies for both vac and unvac). I have no idea why they still insist on testing people who are not sick. All it does is create more drama which this country doesn't need.

Not a fan of tongue in cheek comments I take it?

Or do seriously disagree with the requiring people to have a vaccine to do things and go places already?
 
Not a fan of tongue in cheek comments I take it?

Or do seriously disagree with the requiring people to have a vaccine to do things and go places already?
It’s hard to tell what’s tongue and cheek now days.

I absolutely disagree with requiring vaccines, as well as mask mandates and shutdowns. Let people decide for themselves.
 
I have a question for the armchair attorney's on here: Let's say my kid's public school requires my kid to have a "vaccine" before returning to school in the fall and let's say my kid gets the so called "vaccine" but dies of complications from the 'vaccine', from a legal standpoint, could I take legal action against my kid's school for making that mandatory? I'll hang up and listen.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TX1972
I have a question for the armchair attorney's on here: Let's say my kid's public school requires my kid to have a "vaccine" before returning to school in the fall and let's say my kid gets the so called "vaccine" but dies of complications from the 'vaccine', from a legal standpoint, could I take legal action against my kid's school for making that mandatory? I'll hang up and listen.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html
One more reason for school vouchers.
 
I have a question for the armchair attorney's on here: Let's say my kid's public school requires my kid to have a "vaccine" before returning to school in the fall and let's say my kid gets the so called "vaccine" but dies of complications from the 'vaccine', from a legal standpoint, could I take legal action against my kid's school for making that mandatory? I'll hang up and listen.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html
The only reason a school system would institute such a policy is to avoid reputational risk (i.e., school board members determine that they must follow the vaccine groundswell despite the clear scientific evidence that covid is not a risk to school-age children and the growing evidence of health risks of the vaccine to school age children with underlying heart issues).
It will only take a few of these deaths and law suits to reverse the risk calculus. As soon as the risk to the school system changes from reputational to legal risk then these absurd policies would stop.
Very arm-chair perspective here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Belldozer1
The only reason a school system would institute such a policy is to avoid reputational risk (i.e., school board members determine that they must follow the vaccine groundswell despite the clear scientific evidence that covid is not a risk to school-age children and the growing evidence of health risks of the vaccine to school age children with underlying heart issues).
It will only take a few of these deaths and law suits to reverse the risk calculus. As soon as the risk to the school system changes from reputational to legal risk then these absurd policies would stop.
Very arm-chair perspective here.
No, I agree and unfortunately it will probably take some kids losing their lives due to complications from the 'vaccine' and the ensuing legal battles to get things back into perspective
 
No, I agree and unfortunately it will probably take some kids losing their lives due to complications from the 'vaccine' and the ensuing legal battles to get things back into perspective
That’s it. Unfortunately, we’ve lost the rule of law in this country. There are only a few instances in which repercussions are realized for breaches of law, morality or ethics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LAY THE WOODY
I have a question for the armchair attorney's on here: Let's say my kid's public school requires my kid to have a "vaccine" before returning to school in the fall and let's say my kid gets the so called "vaccine" but dies of complications from the 'vaccine', from a legal standpoint, could I take legal action against my kid's school for making that mandatory? I'll hang up and listen.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html
It depends. If the school district has no process in place for people to be considered exempt from taking the vaccine and requires everyone to be vaccinated then yes there’s some legal exposure to the district as well as the administrators and individual school board members who approved the vaccine requirement. They would have to be reasonable and appropriate in their actions so as to minimize their legal risks.
 
It depends. If the school district has no process in place for people to be considered exempt from taking the vaccine and requires everyone to be vaccinated then yes there’s some legal exposure to the district as well as the administrators and individual school board members who approved the vaccine requirement. They would have to be reasonable and appropriate in their actions so as to minimize their legal risks.
Good point Doc on the potential legal risk to the individual school board members and administrators. Once there is a lawsuit or two and these folks recognize this isn’t a theoretical risk, decision making will change.
 
I have a question for the armchair attorney's on here: Let's say my kid's public school requires my kid to have a "vaccine" before returning to school in the fall and let's say my kid gets the so called "vaccine" but dies of complications from the 'vaccine', from a legal standpoint, could I take legal action against my kid's school for making that mandatory? I'll hang up and listen.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html
Two choices.

You sue them.

You go the school and put a bullet in them and claim defense of imminent threat to the life of your child. I get on the jury and you don't do a day of jail time.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT