ADVERTISEMENT

Coaches

did he say aggy was better than Texas in women's b-ball? you do know Texas was the original superpower of women's hoops right? somebody named jody conradt? they don't stink now, either. you had a year with a fat girl nobody could stop-- congrats on that; it gives you something to put in your hall of champions. but Texas women's b-ball sits only behind tennessee and uconn. baylor is making a push because it is such a young sport. but that's IT
 
i'll give you a top ten
1- notre dame
2- alabama
3- oklahoma
4- ohio state
5- usc
6- TEXAS
7-nebraska
8- michigan
9- miami (titles hard to ignore)
10- probably penn state but i feel like i forgot somebody. maybe fsu?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobWeltlich
not a bad list, but why have ND ahead of Bama? recent success aside, Bama has double the Nattys ND does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobWeltlich
I would rank em this way:

1.Bama
2.OU
3.USC
4.ND
5.UT
6.OSU
7.Michigan
8.Nebraska
9.Miami
10.LSU
 
not a bad list, but why have ND ahead of Bama? recent success aside, Bama has double the Nattys ND does.

i was just going off the top of my head. and i never know how to count "certain" schools' nattys. i know saban's are legit (even though rematches are bad when it's ohio st- mich, but they're okay when it's lsu-bama, and the like), but they use some screwy formulas for ol' bear's. this poll counted but then this one did the next year, then they went back to this one and it only counted before the bowl but then the next year it was after the bowl but they switched it back. i read one of the books about him and these "changes" made my head spin.

but i wouldn't care if alabama or usc or somebody like that was ahead of notre dame-- definitely not a fan.
 
Yes those are historic, but at what point does the history start and at what point does lack of success tarnish it? I would put Penn State historically there. What about Princeton, Yale? Hell, Auburn and Tennessee both have more titles than you.

Yes those are historic, but at what point does the history start and at what point does lack of success tarnish it?
Are you referring to Texas? If so, Texas has played in a National Championship game within the last decade so I'm not sure your point.

I would put Penn State historically there
No, close but they would fall in the next tier. Plus they are blackballed following the Paterno/Sandusky revelations.

What about Princeton, Yale?
Ivy League teams aren't included in these discussions because they no longer play at the highest level of college football

Hell, Auburn and Tennessee both have more titles than you
Wrong.
 
I would rank em this way:

1.Bama
2.OU
3.USC
4.ND
5.UT
6.OSU
7.Michigan
8.Nebraska
9.Miami
10.LSU

Guess we all have our own opinion on this but fact is Ohio state is easily above us. Not sure what you use to measure whose top programs. I don’t like osu at all but they have more NC’s by 2, more conference titles, better winning percentage, more all american and heisman winners.
 
Guess we all have our own opinion on this but fact is Ohio state is easily above us. Not sure what you use to measure whose top programs. I don’t like osu at all but they have more NC’s by 2, more conference titles, better winning percentage, more all american and heisman winners.


Have to agree. No excuse really. Only issue I see is that we have to compete against colossal cheating by other schools. If they aren't going to be punished then it's time to release the dog$. We have the most $$$ by a large margin.

www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-football/reliving-sec-worst-ncaa-infractions-penalties/

http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2017/02/sec_footballs_notable_ncaa_cas.html

http://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/files/Nov2017INF_OhioStateInfractionsPublicDecision_20171114.pdf

https://athlonsports.com/college-football/15-unethical-college-football-programs
 
Last edited:
Joag....I call bullshit on that!....List for me the years that Auburn and Tennessee have won titles in football

You have been just throwing crap out there with no basis in fact. No damned wonder aTm has all those fake titles chisled on the wall......they dont research much.
https://www.foxsports.com/southwest...m-owns-the-most-national-championships-090115

Maybe this is wrong, but Foxsports carries most of your games right? This is where my assertion came from. You can call names if you want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobWeltlich
https://www.foxsports.com/southwest...m-owns-the-most-national-championships-090115

Maybe this is wrong, but Foxsports carries most of your games right? This is where my assertion came from. You can call names if you want.

Tennessee
National championships: 6 (1938, 1940, 1950, 1951, 1967, 1998)

Tennessee football starts and ends with one name: Neyland. “The General” Robert Neyland led the Volunteers to four national championships in three different stints at the school. However, only one of his championships is recognized by the NCAA. Additionally, Tennessee won the consensus 1998 national championship under Phillip Fulmer.

Guess that means 2 Tennessee NC's? Yep.

Auburn
National championships: 2 (1957, 2010)
Unlike many of the teams on this list, Auburn has multiple national championships it chooses not to flaunt. Instead, the Tigers default to simply recognizing the pair of titles recognized by the NCAA. The 1957 title team went undefeated, and was named national champions by the AP despite not being allowed to participate in a bowl game because of suspension. In recent memory, Cam Newton led the Tigers to a dominant national championship run in 2010. Auburn also has six unclaimed national championships.

Texas A&M
National championships: 3 (1919, 1927, 1939)
Before the AP poll was officially recognized in 1936 by the NCAA, declaring national champions was like the Wild West. Perhaps no school makes that more obvious than the Aggies. Texas A&M went from being one-time national champs to three-time title winners over the 2012 offseason, when it was painted on the side of the stadium. The NCAA does recognize 1919 as a three-way split for the national championship. However, the 1927 national championship was based off the Sagarin Ratings, a mathematical formula developed much later. To say the least, this is one of the more unique ways to claim a national title.

SMH at aggy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Pumpedup55
i'm old enough to remember that some of these "national titles" did not happen. byu won in 84, not washington. miami and washington split in 91, but washington wasn't part of the title in 90-- that was georgia tech and colorado. and miami beat nebraska and won in 83, not auburn. these are things i can pick out just from the first few on the list.

and how many times was certain years on the list-- 1970 included?

i also noticed usc claims the 39 natty-- care to comment?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pumpedup55
i'm old enough to remember that some of these "national titles" did not happen. byu won in 84, not washington. miami and washington split in 91, but washington wasn't part of the title in 90-- that was georgia tech and colorado. and miami beat nebraska and won in 83, not auburn. these are things i can pick out just from the first few on the list.

and how many times was certain years on the list-- 1970 included?

i also noticed usc claims the 39 natty-- care to comment?
Agree. There’s some interesting and seriously inflated title numbers by some schools. Your right on 84 title. Michigan state 6 titles. Lmao. And pitt. No way. Schools love to claim excessive titles. I think NCAA counts titles in two ways, in poll era 1936 and onward. And pre historic era. You see Michigan won a lot of their titles in early 1900s. In modern era they only have two, late 40s and 97.
 
Are you SURE aggy only has 3 claimed championships in football??!! The way they talk and beat their little chests i figured it was at leat a minimum of 10.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LonghornMM
Texas A&M
National championships: 3 (1919, 1927, 1939)
Before the AP poll was officially recognized in 1936 by the NCAA, declaring national champions was like the Wild West. Perhaps no school makes that more obvious than the Aggies. Texas A&M went from being one-time national champs to three-time title winners over the 2012 offseason, when it was painted on the side of the stadium. The NCAA does recognize 1919 as a three-way split for the national championship. However, the 1927 national championship was based off the Sagarin Ratings, a mathematical formula developed much later. To say the least, this is one of the more unique ways to claim a national title.

SMH at aggy.
The most pathetic, do-nothing, underachieving program in the history of the sport.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LonghornMM
https://www.foxsports.com/southwest...m-owns-the-most-national-championships-090115

Maybe this is wrong, but Foxsports carries most of your games right? This is where my assertion came from. You can call names if you want.

Tennessee only has between two and four recognized (not just claimed....anyone can do that- see Texas A&M) national championships depending on who you're talking to. Auburn only has two, and one of those was really stinky (Cam Newton$$$)

Plus, Texas has significantly more wins with a higher winning percentage than both Tenn. and Auburn. Also, Texas has double the conference titles of Tenn. and triple that of Auburn. Further, Texas has more bowl wins than both, significantly more All-Americans than both, and Tenn has zero Heisman winners.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT