Your exact sentences from the original post I replied to.........Strong was fired for not winning 7 or 8 games this year, because the talent was there for it, just like it will be there for Herman to win 9 or 10 games next season. If Strong was expected to win 7 or 8 games, then 10 is most definitely attainable next season. If not, then why was Herman hired, and Strong fired. I don't want to hear about a new offense, or a new defense. Several other coaches are winning with much less talent, so if he is a good coach, he'll get it done. The talent is there on both sides of the ball.
If you mean something else then write and post those words. Don't post this and then say it is not what you posted.
I agree with most of what you are saying. But you did in FACT write if Texas doesn't win 10 then why was Herman hired. You said if he is a good coach he will win 10 so I inferred if he is not good then he sucks.....not rocket surgery to come to that conclusion... Don't call me a liar or misinformed or anything else when I call you on it. I also see you are trying to use this as a reason to say no excuses....You just should have said that instead of what you did write..... I think 8 or 9 should be the bottom and I think 10 is mostly attainable...but if Herman wins 8 or 9 and his team doesn't look like the keystone cops Most of us will be happy.....BECAUSE the last 3 years Texas has had losing records after each season. I see your point about no excuses and I agree mostly. If you meant something different then you should write something different.
You claim Texas has a lot of talent. I think they have talent to. I just want to put things in perspective....Mack Brown had 3 top classes in a row and most of us thought there was a lot of talent for Strong. Turns out there was not as much talent as we all thought. Until these guys play like talented players then they have not shown anything.
You are starting to sound like a certain poster that has been banned from here several times.
Last edited: