Scholz, I think you are the only guy that would call Georgia average. A team that played in the championship game last year and is ranked in the top 10?. And your Ole Miss/Tech excuse about the quarterback is just plain funny.
Offcial, Registered. Texas vs Baylor Thread!
- Thread starter FlourBluffHorn
- Start date
Scholz, I think you are the only guy that would call Georgia average. A team that played in the championship game last year and is ranked in the top 10?. And your Ole Miss/Tech excuse about the quarterback is just plain funny.
Georgia was good last year. They lost a lot. They start 3 Freshmen on the offensive line. Just because you can't adjust to reality doesn't mean much. You're a biased aggy that gets his self confidence from other teams. Georgia got mudholed by LSU. Run the eff over. Them being in the top 10 is simply SEC bias and weakass SEC scheduling. They've played one team. One. And got destroyed.
Tech would beat Ole Miss now with the new QB (that you apparently were ignorant of). Fact. They'd destroy your team with your terrible secondary too.
I notice you only defended Georgia too. None of the other 10 SEC jags.
Tech would beat Ole Miss now with the new QB (that you apparently were ignorant of). Fact. They'd destroy your team with your terrible secondary too.
I notice you only defended Georgia too. None of the other 10 SEC jags.
Last edited:
A new QB is worth 21 points? Really. It is the same Tech defense that Ole Miss ran and passed all over. They could have scored 60 if they didn't slow down. Ole Miss is in the bottom half of the SEC and Tech might be in the top 2 of the Big 12 when all is said and done.
The Big 12 was really bad in OOC (see Army, Tulsa, Maryland for starters). Using your reasoning, Tulsa would beat you guys with the new kicker they could find from the student body.
Sigh. Well congrats on Ole Miss then I guess. Put their Tech win on your wall with all of your other fake titles.
Retarded extrapolation but expected. Re: Tulsa, I see you dishonestly left out the part of us kneeling down in scoring position as the game ended. Also expected.
BTW, you didn't answer my question of which previously banned bitter, obsessed aggy you are. Because you have 6 posts and all directed at me as you started your new posting life on full tilt. Lulz.
Retarded extrapolation but expected. Re: Tulsa, I see you dishonestly left out the part of us kneeling down in scoring position as the game ended. Also expected.
BTW, you didn't answer my question of which previously banned bitter, obsessed aggy you are. Because you have 6 posts and all directed at me as you started your new posting life on full tilt. Lulz.
Last edited:
aggy, what does Ole Miss beating Tech have anything to do with a&m? When are you people going to stop riding the coattails of your conference and ever win anything on your own?
Interesting you are calling Ole Miss bad when they beat one of the better Big 12 teams by 20 (and could have been a lot worse) and would most likely finish in the top half of the Big 12.
Laughable. You're not honest enough or knowledgeable enough to look at Tech's current team. That's OK. Ole Miss has gone downhill since that game too. They're a bad team now. They barely beat Arkansas who flat out sucks and lost to Auburn who also sucks. Not that you're honest enough to admit that either. Tech would beat your team by 40 btw with your atrocious secondary. You're just lucky to play in a league that can't complete a forward pass. Most SEC games look like 1930s Army vs Navy this year.
Face it, the bottom half of your conference is hammered dog shit. Outside of a few teams, it's a bunch of mediocre to flat out bad teams. You'll all be riding Bama and LSU's jocks to think you're good though. It's the SECSECSEC way. Lulz.
I notice you didn't try to prop up Miss St with their powerful 3-point offensive output either.
Last edited:
Scholz, I will listen to you make your case for why the Big 12 is the best top to bottom conference as you say. What are the good OOC victories? Texas vs USC might be the best and USC is a shadow of their usual self. Why is Tech so good? Who have they beaten? TCU-they are not any good. OSU?-KSU just beat them. There just aren't many metrics I see at all that back up all this Big 12 stuff you throw out. Your changing QB argument about Tech/Ole Miss continues to be silly.
Anyone besides KU can beat anyone else on a given weekend, that’s why. You may be right though. The Big XII may be a bunch of average teams to that end.
Fact remains the SEC is just like any other P5 conference though. You guys just dishonestly game the rankings in multiple ways. Your league is not special.
Fact remains the SEC is just like any other P5 conference though. You guys just dishonestly game the rankings in multiple ways. Your league is not special.
Ok, we kind of agree
. One thing that you will have to agree (I think) on is that the SEC had a run of 5 different teams winning the National championship in 5 consecutive years not long ago. I don't see the Big 12 ever doing that.
Congrats.
Congrats. Put it on your wall. And you have something on your lip btw.
Ok, we kind of agree
What does that have to do with a&m? Your school isn't in the stratosphere of conversation for a national championship. You aggys embarrassingly ride the $EC's coattails, while doing nothing to strengthen the conference.
Wrong, they gave the good teams inroads into Texas recruiting. Unwittingly.
What aggy doesn't get is that the $EC signed them up to use them for the Texas TV market and for recruiting in Texas. That's the only reason why the $EC wanted a&m. They know that they're no threat to their traditional powers.
Aggie should just wear maroon SEC shirts. Hey Alabama won the NC guys so we win too!
I know that winning championships is the key for so many of you in here. How many Big 12 Championships have OU, UT, A&M, and Kansas won respectively?
A detailed analysis of that data set by researchers at Harvard University revealed that not a single one of those five teams was named "Texas A&M".....
You did not answer my question. I am even using your yardstick about winning championships! I will give you another chance.
You did not answer my question from post# 437.
Is eddieshaveshop.....aggyeric......or swag? THAT'S the real question?
maybe one of them guys who has a switch personality, one min he Swag then turns to aggy, then turns into a bus station whore and then back..and fourth
Hook'em
OU has 11, Texas 3, A&M 1 (not in conference for last 6 years) and Kansas 0. Looks like it is OU and then the rest of us are all together. And this is using your yardstick (winning championships).
BCS games count, lesser. So do national championships. So it’s really OU and us and then you’re left to haggle with the KUs of the world.
Well eddie here is a little more for you to chew on.....don't choke....we would love a response.
Since the creation of the BIGXII in 1996 to 2014..... when little aggy ran away just to end up being beat up on by even bigger bullies........in Bama and LSU.
Ou had an overall 8-7 bowl record with an impressive 9 BCS bowl appearances with a 4-5 BCS bowl record.
TEXAS had an overall 9-6 bowl record going 3-1 in BCS bowl appearances
Aggy had an overall 4-9 bowl record with a stellar 0-1in BCS bowl appearances
In this 1996-2014 time frame both TEXAS and Ou have as many National Championships as aggy does since 1939.
Food for thought.......when has aggy ever been relevent......not sure 1939 counts as being a "Blue Blooded" program.....would love to hear a response.....so dry those aggy tears and man up.....lets hear it.
Since the creation of the BIGXII in 1996 to 2014..... when little aggy ran away just to end up being beat up on by even bigger bullies........in Bama and LSU.
Ou had an overall 8-7 bowl record with an impressive 9 BCS bowl appearances with a 4-5 BCS bowl record.
TEXAS had an overall 9-6 bowl record going 3-1 in BCS bowl appearances
Aggy had an overall 4-9 bowl record with a stellar 0-1in BCS bowl appearances
In this 1996-2014 time frame both TEXAS and Ou have as many National Championships as aggy does since 1939.
Food for thought.......when has aggy ever been relevent......not sure 1939 counts as being a "Blue Blooded" program.....would love to hear a response.....so dry those aggy tears and man up.....lets hear it.
No arguments here. Out of the last four decades, Texas has had one great (or really good one), the 2000's. That is the main timeline you are referencing and you guys had a great run there.
Someone else posted this awhile back, but in the 80's, 90's, and this decade, A&M has the better program on any data point you want to measure championships, overall record, etc (or we are tied). Combine that with the recent Forbes report and it is clear we are not back in the 60's and 70's. It is a new day. There is a reason the Big 12 Championship game draws the 11:00 AM time slot. You guys know that you need to be in a new conference. That may happen. We'll see. The other smart thing might be to pick up UCF and USF. Maybe Cincy and BYU. Not sure why the league did not pick up the Florida schools.
Laugher, the only time aggy has been relevant is when Jackie $herrill was the coach. We all know how that ended. Not to worry, the same thing will happen to Jimbo Fi$her. We own the Texas press and will dish the news when convenient. It must suck to be aggy. They have to wake up every day, "wondering if today is the day they get busted."
Similar threads
