Guys, please know I’m not attacking. Just having friendly conversation. Sometimes written words seem to hold emotion that wasn’t intended.
Oldhorn, just to be clear, are you really saying that spontaneous generation hasn’t been disproven? It’s one of the first things taught in pretty much any biology book. Non-living things don’t turn into living things.
Son of Wasatch, I wasn’t necessarily saying God has limited life to Earth. I assure you my view of God is as big as my human brain can fathom. The point I was making was that just because there might be somewhat favorable conditions elsewhere does not mean that life exists there. Non-living material doesn’t form into living material by chance.
There are two huge problems right out of the starting blocks in the race to explain our existence outside of a creator. 1. You have to assume that all of the thousands of finely tuned dependencies that occur in our universe, galaxy, and Solar system to allow life to be possible happened randomly by accident. Keep in mind if the universe was expanding at a rate any slower or faster than it’s is now, You wouldn’t be reading this. You wouldn’t exist. 2. Once that big accident happened, totally randomly, some non-living matter ALSO formed into a living thing randomly, by chance. This goes against everything we know about biology, chemistry, and physics. Furthermore, nowhere ever have we observed that EVER happening in nature . . . ever. Yet, people put their faith in those two things, regardless of their absurdity.
Arno Penzias, Nobel laureate in Physics and the former director of Bell Laboratories states that “Astronomy leads us to a unique event, a universe which was created out of nothing, and delicately balanced to provide exactly the conditions required to support life. In the absence of an absurdly-improbable accident, the observations of modern science seem to suggest an underlying, one might say, supernatural plan”.
Oldhorn, just to be clear, are you really saying that spontaneous generation hasn’t been disproven? It’s one of the first things taught in pretty much any biology book. Non-living things don’t turn into living things.
Son of Wasatch, I wasn’t necessarily saying God has limited life to Earth. I assure you my view of God is as big as my human brain can fathom. The point I was making was that just because there might be somewhat favorable conditions elsewhere does not mean that life exists there. Non-living material doesn’t form into living material by chance.
There are two huge problems right out of the starting blocks in the race to explain our existence outside of a creator. 1. You have to assume that all of the thousands of finely tuned dependencies that occur in our universe, galaxy, and Solar system to allow life to be possible happened randomly by accident. Keep in mind if the universe was expanding at a rate any slower or faster than it’s is now, You wouldn’t be reading this. You wouldn’t exist. 2. Once that big accident happened, totally randomly, some non-living matter ALSO formed into a living thing randomly, by chance. This goes against everything we know about biology, chemistry, and physics. Furthermore, nowhere ever have we observed that EVER happening in nature . . . ever. Yet, people put their faith in those two things, regardless of their absurdity.
Arno Penzias, Nobel laureate in Physics and the former director of Bell Laboratories states that “Astronomy leads us to a unique event, a universe which was created out of nothing, and delicately balanced to provide exactly the conditions required to support life. In the absence of an absurdly-improbable accident, the observations of modern science seem to suggest an underlying, one might say, supernatural plan”.
Last edited:
