Seems a bit risky. Would have thought Herman would be a little bit smarter than that.
Hook Em
PS: Can't what til baseball gets started....
Hook Em
PS: Can't what til baseball gets started....
The guy defended his coach, I won't knock him for that.... I doubt he was privy to everything that occurred at BU and the head of the snake was cut off. Arizona hired Bennett, FAU hired Baby Briles, these are the guys that actually had a play in what occurred. While Horny had a public display of support for his HC on twitter, I'll take it as a lesson learned and move on. It doesn't mean he nor I condone what occurred within the BU football program. He was a grad assistant with Giles and Herman there is a history between them. I'll stick with Herman knows what he is getting and let him do his job. That's my view on Horny at Texas.
100% correct. In a week 99% of fans will forget this guy's name.Like I said, it's Hermans gig and he is pulling a buddy out of the pig slough and giving him a fresh start, game on. IT won't even be talked about in a few days.
IMO: This is being over blown. Dude was way down on the totem pole at BU, he supported his boss like most of us would do in our everyday jobs if we feared we were going to get fired if we didn't.
I'm glad you posted this. This is a consistency check. Briles was vilified for NOT REPORTING TO THE POLICE. If that is a horrible offense, then this guy committed the same act (to the extent he knew). We all have convicted Briles without a lot of evidence. If he was canned because there was no way he couldn't have known what was going on (which HAS to be true) - then there's no way Horny couldn't have known. Its a small staff. And he doubled down with the tweets.None of those #truthdontlie coverup MF'ers should ever be employed at Texas. Colossal screw up by Herman and the AD.
Sorry to hear you have no integrity. I've walked out of a job over less.
This guy was 2 levels above the janitor. Briles was responsible for the program, this guy was and is a glorified GA. I doubt very seriously he was engaged in anything but his tiny area of control. He probably made more coffee and brought Briles lunch more times than he was asked his opinion on anything of importance. Why would he be pulled into something that could ruin the program?Sorry to hear you have no integrity. I've walked out of a job over less.
I don't buy this at all. Those coaches know EVERYTHING that is going on. That team is a small fraternity. First the story line was Briles created a culture of rape, openly recruiting thugs. Then the 4 recruits, WHO VOLUNTARILY CHOSE BRILES AND HIS CULTURE OVER ST. CHARLIE AND HIS CODE OF CONDUCT, were cut loose, and were welcomed with open arms in Austin, with the story line being - thank goodness they were rescued. Now we have a coach who signed on with Briles, and stuck out for 9 YEARS. The story line now appears he must have had little involvement. I call BS - if the standard is that Briles should've gone to the police, then this guy should have too. Keeping his mouth shut to save his job or because he believed Briles? Ha. Let's be consistent. And that goes to you Gooners defending Stoops and Mixon too.Judgement on an internet board, take a look in the mirror my friend.
Just saying he was low enough on the totem pole that he probably sat in all the meetings and believed everything Briles told him. Fact is if this dude had any involvement in any part of the scandal we would know and he would have not been hired at UT.
LOOSE LIPS SINK SHIPS, it would have sunk long ago if it was common knowledge. Too many coaches come and go. It was all on a need to know basis and it sure sounds like it was kept between a select few at the very top and within a whisper of Briles. You're suggesting the athletic trainers know everything the staff is privy to, it's simply not true and never will be. I'm sure there is gossip (hell, I know there is), that happens everywhere, but little to zero factual happenings took place in front of or were spoke directly too those employed down the ladder.I don't buy this at all. Those coaches know EVERYTHING that is going on. That team is a small fraternity. First the story line was Briles created a culture of rape, openly recruiting thugs. Then the 4 recruits, WHO VOLUNTARILY CHOSE BRILES AND HIS CULTURE OVER ST. CHARLIE AND HIS CODE OF CONDUCT, were cut loose, and were welcomed with open arms in Austin, with the story line being - thank goodness they were rescued. Now we have a coach who signed on with Briles, and stuck out for 9 YEARS. The story line now appears he must have had little involvement. I call BS - if the standard is that Briles should've gone to the police, then this guy should have too. Keeping his mouth shut to save his job or because he believed Briles? Ha. Let's be consistent. And that goes to you Gooners defending Stoops and Mixon too.
I'm glad you posted this. This is a consistency check. Briles was vilified for NOT REPORTING TO THE POLICE. If that is a horrible offense, then this guy committed the same act (to the extent he knew). We all have convicted Briles without a lot of evidence. If he was canned because there was no way he couldn't have known what was going on (which HAS to be true) - then there's no way Horny couldn't have known. Its a small staff. And he doubled down with the tweets.
To echo the other posters - this is NOT worth it. If you have a problem with Briles, then you should have a problem with this hire.
Gossip and rumors are one thing and they are typically just that. I was Privy to that type of info for several years in the late 90's as I was around the team, trainers, student trainers, etc. Close confines, especially on road trips. Lot's of BS gets tossed around.Athletic trainers, Equipment Managers and S&C coaches are around the players a ton and sometimes they know more than the coaches because there are some things athletes would tell an athletic trainer or strength coach. The other thing is that you are in the building all day every day so you hear things. Horny might not have known everything but he probably had a pretty good idea of what was going on. This is a really bad hire. Very high risk, very low reward. If any news comes out of Baylor, then Herman will be asked about it in a press conference and given the drip, drip, drip out of Baylor I fully expect there to be news in the spring. There are still multiple title IX lawsuits pending.
With all due respect - this is the exact line of argument given by the Briles.LOOSE LIPS SINK SHIPS, it would have sunk long ago if it was common knowledge. Too many coaches come and go. It was all on a need to know basis and it sure sounds like it was kept between a select few at the very top and within a whisper of Briles. You're suggesting the athletic trainers know everything the staff is privy to, it's simply not true and never will be. I'm sure there is gossip (hell, I know there is), that happens everywhere, but little to zero factual happenings took place in front of or were spoke directly too those employed down the ladder.
Gossip and rumors are one thing and they are typically just that. I was Privy to that type of info for several years in the late 90's as I was around the team, trainers, student trainers, etc. Close confines, especially on road trips. Lot's of BS gets tossed around.
With all due respect - this is the exact line of argument given by the Briles.
You and I are on the same page and I was privy to all the above as well. Much of what never goes public. What he "Knows" us an unknown and you're simply making an assumption (and we all know all too well what assumptions lead to) by suggesting he had all the details, etc. What he knows would likely make for an interesting conversation and I totally understand why some folks dislike the hire. It doesn't bother me so I 'll take on the role of being a hypocrite.I was a student trainer at UT. I was in the building from 1ish until 7ish every day during the season. I was at every practice from 2 a days through the bowl game. I would travel on road trips and on game day I was there for a good 8-10 hours. Trust me just being a fly on the wall you hear more than gossip and BS.
I was also a strength coach at the D2 level. My office was in the athletic training room. We knew as much if not more than the coaches about what was going on. We knew who partied with who, who was dating who, who was into drugs. This guy even though he was a QC coach knew stuff. There is no way he couldn't have known.
His DC, a primary confidant whom was implicated. Horny hasn't been mentioned in a damn thing other than his tweets being ridiculed.What evidence is out there that lead you to form such an opinion on Phil Bennett but not this guy?
You and I are on the same page and I was privy to all the above as well. Much of what never goes public. What he "Knows" us an unknown and you're simply making an assumption (and we all know all too well what assumptions lead to) by suggesting he had all the details, etc. What he knows would likely make for an interesting conversation and I totally understand why some folks dislike the hire. It doesn't bother me so I 'll take on the role of being a hypocrite.
With all due respect - this is the exact line of argument given by the Briles.
I strongly disagree. Briles's crime wasn't that he was the head. It was (allegedly) that he knew about a gang rape and did not call the police. No one let him off the hook when he told the girl's soccer coach that she should call the police. It was incumbent on Briles to call the police, because that is the right thing to do, whether you are head coach or janitor. The QC knew and did not report to the police. When 4 college guys are involved in a gang rape, stuff like that isn't kept quiet in the locker room - he knew.Difference is Briles was the head of the football program. That's like saying the CEO of the company didn't know that his company was reporting fraudulent numbers to his investors. You take a high profile job you better believe you have more responsibility then a GA or QC member.
The QC knew and did not report to the police.