ADVERTISEMENT

Ketch's 10 Thoughts From The Weekend (Continuing my crusade!!!!!)

The attitudes on here simply amaze me - is this not a message board where we discuss how the program is run? How it could be run better ?

The balance of recruits we take? That we expect to land a high percentage of our targets ? Play calling etc?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Old Tascosa
So many here act like any set of coaches we have are infallible - right until they fail and then the lot of them were morons

Tipping run and pass plays with running back alignment comes to mind
 
ee0e3a40b744e2eebc3b4d949eaa9055x.jpg

I do not hate three-star prospects.

Before I go any further, I feel like I should stress this.

No three-star high school football prospect ever took away any of my ex-girlfriends that I'm aware of. Or took my lunch money. Or bullied me on a basketball court.

None of this is personal.

I just don't think a program with significant aspirations as a major college football program should be making significant investments in them in the age of the college football portal.

Of course, it's not an opinion that most college football coaches would likely agree with and that includes the entire Texas Longhorns coaching staff. Yet, I'm not going to back down from this particular hot take, which feels like less of a hot take and more like common sense from my perspective. In the coming paragraphs, I'm going to try and pull you to my way of thinking.

Before I hit you over the head with math, I'm going to begin with a little common sense. Two of the biggest issues facing the three-star prospect at a program like Texas are time and patience. Neither the prospect nor the program typically have enough of either.

More times than not, the average college football prospect needs two or three years to develop before he begins to scratch the surface of becoming a plus-player at a major program (if it ever happens). If you happen to find a player that is comfortable with a three-year window of development, that player has to hope that he doesn't get recruited over in the process.

Take the three different three-star offensive linemen in the Class of 2020 for the Longhorns - Andrej Karic, Jaylen Garth and Logan Parr. None of the three have been in the program for three seasons yet, but when those players reach their third seasons of the program, they'll be staring at the likes of Kelvin Banks, Devon Campbell, Neto Umeozulu and the rest of the 2022 offensive line class that will likely moved above them in the pecking order as younger players.

The reality at a program like Texas is that a player usually starts to contribute in his first or second season in the program or he gets recruited over or bypassed by someone from the portal. Almost by definition, most three-star prospects aren't ready to contribute at high levels in their first couple of seasons.

See the rub?

Let's take a look at some recent history in the Texas program.

Of the 7 three- and two-star (non-kicking) prospects that the Longhorns signed in 2018, the best of the lot is probably Moro Ojomo. The only other contributor is Christian Jones. Everyone else is gone.

Of the 10 three-star players in the 2019 recruiting class, only Roschon Johnson and T'Vondre Sweat remain in the program. Everyone else is gone.

Of the 9 three-star players from the 2020 class, only Jaylan Ford and Jahdae Barron are sure contributors on the 2022 team.

It's not that three stars never hit. It's that you have to sort through a lot of misses to get to them. During that three-year window, a major college program can't have aspirations for the very top and only come away with five pretty good players out of a 26-player pile of players. That's a 20-percent return on the program's investment and it includes two back-up defensive tackles, a back-up running back, a starting cornerback and a starting inside linebacker that the staff has been trying all-off-season to upgrade on.

Johnson and Barron look like players that will play in the NFL from my vantage point, but getting a 7.7% return on high-level players just isn't good enough. Typically, hitting on the average three-star prospect is a 1 in 10 proposition.

It's like going to the county fair and shooting hoops on a 12-foot goal with a crooked rim, only to win a $20 stuffed panda after you've spent $40.

That's not winning as much as it's not walking away with a total disaster.

No. 2 - Let's look under the burnt orange hood ...

As we work our way through this conversation, let's take a look at the long-term success of the Longhorns with regards to taking three-star prospects by looking at every three-star that Texas has ever signed by position.

Quarterbacks

2005 Colt McCoy, 2006 Sherrod Harris, 2007 G.J. Kinne, 2019 Case McCoy, 2011 David Ash, 2019 Roschon Johnson and 2021 Charles Wright

Notes: What an eclectic little group of players. Technically, only one of the players that has completed his eligibility hit for the Longhorns, but that hit has his number retired. Meanwhile, the second McCoy on this list had some big wins as a starter and it's impossible to know what might have happened with Ash had concussions not ended his career.

NFL Draft rate: 20%

Two things I'd say about this group ...

a. By the time we get to the end of this discussion, I'm going to make a mini-exemption for quarterbacks.
b. I personally rated McCoy and Ash as four stars. Just wanted to say that for the record.

Running backs

2002 Clint Haney, 2005 Jerrell Wilkerson, 2005 Michael Houston, 2006 Antwan Cobb, 2008 Brock Fitzhenry, 2008 Tre Newton, 2008 Ryan Roberson, 2011 Joe Bergeron, 2014 Kevin Shorter, 2016 Tristian Houston and 2017 Daniel Young.

Notes: Technically, D'Onta Foreman was ranked as an athlete, which means that either Newton or Bergeron are the best players out of this group. That tells a story.

NFL Draft rate: 0%

Wide Receivers

2002 Dustin Miksch, 2004 Chris Ogbonnaya, 2004 Nate Jones, 2006 John Marshall, 2011 Miles Onyegbule, 2012 Marcus Johnson, 2013 Montrel Meander, 2014 Dorian Leonard, 2014 Garrett Gray, 2014 Roderick Bernard, 2015 Gilbert Johnson, 2015 Ryan Newsome, 2015 Davion Curtis, 2016 Reggie Hemphill-Mapps, 2017 Jordan Pouncey, 2019 Kennedy Lewis, 2020 Dajon Harrison, 2021 Casey Cain, 2021 Keithron Lee and 2022 Savion Redd

Notes: Going all the way back to Marcus Johnson in 2012, the Longhorns are 0 for their last 12 (not counting Cain or Redd). The three best players from this group are Johnson (who, I ironically ranked as a four-star), Jones and Ogbonnaya - none of whom where all-conference level players as starters, even if all three played on Sundays (one at running back).

NFL Draft rate: 0%

Tight ends

2003 Steve Hogan, 2004 Peter Ullman, 2006 Britt Mitchell, 2006 Greg Smith, 2007 Ahmard Howard, 2007 Ian Harris, 2009 Trey Graham, 2009 Barrett Matthews, 2013 Geoff Swaim, 2014 Blake Whiteley, 2016 Peyton Aucoin, 2017 Cade Brewer, 2019 Jared Wiley and 2021 Juan Davis.

Notes: Out of the 13 players that have completed their eligibility, only Swaim (7th round by the Dallas Cowboys) ever played on Sundays and you could make a strong case that Brewer is the second-best contributor from this group.

NFL Draft rate: 7.7%

Offensive Linemen

2002 Brett Valdez, 2003 Kyle Thornton, 2003 Dallas Griffin, 2004 Adam Ulatoski, 2005 Charlie Tanner, 2005 Chris Hall, 2006 Roy Watts, 2006 Steve Moore, 2008 Luke Poehlmann, 2009 Paden Kelley, 2011 Taylor Doyle, 2011 Marcus Hutchins, 2013 Desmond Harrison, 2014 Elijah Rodriguez, 2014 Terrell Cuney, 2014 Alex Anderson, 2015 Garrett Thomas, 2015 Ronnie Major, 2015 Tristan Nickelson, 2016 Brandon Hodges, 2016 Tope Imade, 2016 Zach Shackelford, 2017 Sam Cosmi, 2017 Derek Kerstetter, 2018 Reese Moore, 2018 Rafiti Ghirmai, 2019 Willie Tyler, 2020 Andrej Karic, 2020 Jaylen Garth, 2020 Logan Parr, 2021 Hayden Conner, 2022 Lance St. Louis and 2022 Connor Robertson

Notes: Out of the 27 players that have completed their eligibility, only Cosmi was drafted. Harrison joins him as a guy that played on Sundays, but he literally never started a game for the Longhorns, no matter how much @Alex Dunlap tried to will it to happen. Other than that, most of the contributors on the list were never really more than pretty good at best, with the likely exception of Ulatoski. This is going to sound harsh, but I'd make the case that one of the problems Texas football has had in the last 15 years is that too many of those players ended up playing a lot of snaps for the program.

NFL Draft rate: 3.7%

No. 3 - Can I just take a brief moment to say ...

OF THE 81 OFFENSIVE PROSPECTS THAT TEXAS HAS TAKEN SINCE 2002, ONLY FIVE WERE DRAFTED BY NFL TEAMS!!!!!!!!

No. 4 - Continuing with the Defense ...

Defensive Tackles


2003 Thomas Marshall, 2004 Derek Lokey, 2006 Ben Alexander, 2007 Tyrell Higgins, 2007 Michael Wilcoxon, 2010 Deaires Cotton, 2012 Brandon Moore, 2012 Alex Norman, 2014 Chris Nelson, 2014 Poona Ford, 2015 Du'Vonta Lampkin, 2016 Jordan Elliott, 2016 Gerald Wilbon, 2016 Marcel Southall, 2018 Christian Jones, 2018 Moro Ojomo, 2021 Byron Murphy, 2022 Aaron Bryant and 2022 Kris Ross

Notes: This is actually a group that performs very well, as Lokey, Ford and Elliott all played on Sundays. Of course, Ford was legitimately a great player for the Longhorns. Ironically, the only player (Elliott) from the group of the 14 that have completed their eligibility and was actually drafted only played in six games for the Longhorns before transferring. Getting at least 20+ of a contributor rate isn't a terrible number, especially when Ojomo and Murphy will end up boosting the numbers above 30%.

NFL Draft rate: 7.1%

Defensive Ends

2006 Brian Ellis, 2007 Sam Acho, 2009 Dominique Jones, 2009 Kyle Kriegel, 2012 Caleb Bluiett, 2012 Byrce Cotrell, 2014 Jake McMillon, 2015 Quincy Vasser, 2016 Malcolm Roach, 2016 Andrew Fitzgerald, 2017 Max Cummins, 2017 Jamari Chisholm, 2017 Taquan Graham, 2018 Daniel Carson, 2018 Mike Williams, 2019 T'Vondre Sweat, 2019 Peter Mpagi, 2019 Sawyer Gorham-Welch, 2021 David Abiara, 2021 Barryn Sorrell and 2021 Jordan Thomas,

Notes: Acho is obviously a big hit. Beyond him, Roach and Graham were hits of lesser extent, but still proved to be NFL-level talents. The problem is that almost all of the other players that have finished their eligibility turned out to be complete dudes. Yet, if Sweat has a big year in 2022 and Sorrell pans out as people inside the program hope, we could be talking about a position group with a near 25-percent success rate as quality performers.

NFL Draft rate: 12.5%

Linebackers

2002 Brian Robison, 2002 Marcus Myers, 2003 Scott Derry, 2004 Jeremy Campbell, 2004 Rashad Bobino, 2004 Nic Redwine, 2005 Roderrick Muckelroy, 2008 Dustin Earnest, 2008 Emmanuel Acho, 2009 Patrick Nkwopara, 2012 Dalton Santos, 2012 Alex De La Torre, 2013 Naashon Hughes, 2014 Cameron Hampton, 2014 Andrew Beck, 2015 Cameron Townsend, 2015 Breckyn Hager, 2018 Byron Hobbs, 2019 Caleb Johnson, 2019 Marcus Tillman, 2019 Juwan Mitchell, 2020 Jaylan Ford, 2021 Morice Blackwell, 2021 Terrence Cooks, 2022 Derrick Brown and 2022 Trevell Johnson

Notes: Robison, Muckelroy and Acho were all definite hits, but I'd argue that the program has missed on its last 12, with all due respect to Beck and Hager, who proved to be solid players at other positions. It's kind of a tricky group of players to talk about, but this is an undeniable fact - Texas hasn't struck gold (even remotely) at the actual linebacker position for its defense since the pre-Will Muschamp days.

NFL Draft rate: 13.6%

Defensive Backs

2002 Matthew Melton, 2003 Brandon Foster, 2004 Ryan Palmer, 2006 James Henry, 2008 Blake Gideon, 2010 Adrian White, 2011 Leroy Scott, 2012 Kevin Vaccaro, 2013 Erik Huhn, 2014 Jermaine Roberts, 2014 John Bonney, 2014 Jason Hall, 2015 PJ Locke, 2016 Eric Cuffee, 2016 Chris Brown, 2017 Kobe Boyce and 2019 Marquise Caldwell

Notes: There are a few decent college players in that group, including Foster, Palmer, Gideon and Brown, but not a single impact player ever emerged from a group of 17 players. You'd probably say that Gideon was the best of that group and only Brown warrants being in a conversation with him in the last 15 years.

NFL Draft rate: 0.0%

Athletes

2003 Eric Foreman, 2008 Antoine Hicks, 2012 Jalen Overstreet, 2012 Adrian Colbert, 2013 Chevoski Collins, 2014 D'Onta Foreman, 2015 Deandre McNeal, 2016 Lil'Jordan Humphrey, 2016 Donovan Duvernay, 2020 Kelvontay Dixon, 2020 Jaden Hullaby and 2022 Xavian Brice

Notes: It's interesting that two of the biggest hits of the last decade for the Longhorns on the offensive side of the ball, were listed as "athletes" coming out of high school. Colbert ended up being an NFL player, but only emerged into that kind of player after transferring from the program. Still, not too shabby, given the sample size.

NFL Draft rate: 18.2%

No. 5 - A few final thoughts and some rules ...

... If we mix in all of the athletes into the correct side of the ball, it means that five of the last 81 three-star players that the Longhorns have signed on the offensive side of the ball have eventually been drafted by NFL teams. That's 6.2%.

... The number of NFL drafted players from the defensive side of the ball stands at six in 75 over the last two decades. That's 8%.

... Of the 10 three-star players that have been drafted out of the 153 prospects who have completed their eligibility, the following were recruited post-2008 ... Geoff Swaim, Sam Cosmi, Jordan Elliott, Taquan Graham, Adrian Colbert and D'Onte Foreman. That's six players and two of them ended up transferring from Texas. Only two were All-Big 12 players.

... No three-star player ever recruited by Texas in the modern era of the Rivals rankings (2002) has ever been selected as a first-round pick.

You can throw in an occasional Marcus Johnson, Lil'Jordan Humphrey or Poona Ford, but the bottom line on these numbers remains poor.

Moving forward, the best thing the Texas program can do is let other programs develop these 1 in 10s and then poach them in the transfer portal.

The only exceptions that should be made are the following:

a. An occasional quarterback from the state of Texas. We'll call it the Colt McCoy rule.
b. An occasional BIG defensive lineman. No tweeners. They all need to be either a defensive tackle or a defensive end that is at least 6-4, 240 pounds.
c. Raw two-way athletes that can play on either side of the ball.
d. Kickers or Punters.

That's it.

Otherwise, that scholarship needs to be saved for a player coming through the Portal with more pure upside (think Agiye Hall) or proven credentials (think Isaiah Neyor).

No. 6 - Historical trends: In-State Defensive Tackles ...

A week ago in this column, we took a look at defensive ends from the Lone Star State and with the commitment of Sydir Mitchell, I thought it might be a good time to look at the defensive tackles that the state produces.

If some of you want the cliffs on this section without having to sort through the names, here are the key points.

a. 75% of five-star players from Texas from 2002-2017 were drafted by NFL teams and 87.5% played on Sundays.
b. 33.3% of high four-star players from Texas from 2004-2017 were drafted by NFL teams.
c. 0.0% of mid four-star players from Texas from 2004-2017 were drafted by NFL teams.
d. 11.8% of low four-star players from Texas from 2004-2017 were drafted by NFL teams.
e. 15.2% of high three-star players from Texas from 2004-2017 were drafted by NFL teams.

Here's how it all looks when you go under the hood of each rankings tier:

Let's look at the five-stars.


2002 - Rod Wright (Texas)
2004 - Frank Okam (Texas)
2005 - Demarcus Granger (Oklahoma)
2012 - Mario Edwards (Florida State)
2012 - Malcom Brown (Texas)
2013 - A'Shawn Robinson (Alabama)
2016 - Ed Oliver (Houston)
2017 - Marvin Wilson (Florida State)

Breakdown

* 6 of the 8 players (75.0%) were drafted by NFL teams and 7 of the 8 played on Sundays.

* 3 of the last 5 five-star defensive tackles since 2005 have been selected in the first round of the NFL Draft and another (Edwards) was selected in the second round.

Now let's look at the high four stars:


2005 - Roy Miller (Texas)
2007 - Andre Jones (Texas)
2008 - Jarvis Humphrey (Texas)
2009 - Jamarkus McFarland (Oklahoma)
2009 - Calvin Howell (Texas)
2015 - Daylon Mack (Texas A&M)

Breakdown

* 2 of the 6 players (33.0%) were drafted by NFL teams: Miller (3rd round) and Mack (5th round).

Mid Four Stars


2008 - Chancey Aghayere (LSU)
2010 - Ashton Dorsey (Texas)
2010 - Taylor Bible (Texas)
2013 - Justin Manning (Texas A&M)
2013 - Isaiah Golden (Texas A&M)
2013 - Kerrick Huggins (Oklahoma)
2014 - Deshawn Washington (Texas A&M)
2015 - Darrian Daniels (Oklahoma State)

Breakdown

* 0 of the 8 players (0.0%) were drafted by NFL teams.

Low Four Stars

2004 - Walter Thomas (Oklahoma State)
2005 - Vince Oghobaase (Duke)
2005 - Vincent Williams (Texas A&M)
2005 - Brandon Antwine (Florida)
2008 - Rod Davis (Texas A&M)
2008 - Kheeston Randall (Texas)
2010 - Eric Humphrey (Oklahoma)
2011 - Jordan Wade (Oklahoma)
2011 - Quincy Russell (Texas)
2011 - Desmond Jackson (Texas)
2011 - Marquis Anderson (Oklahoma)
2012 - Paul Boyette (Texas)
2013 - Hardreck Walker (Texas A&M)
2013 - Andrew Billings (Baylor)
2014 - Zaycoven Henderson (Texas A&M)
2016 - Chris Daniels (Texas)
2016 - Kendall Jones (Alabama)

Breakdown

* 2 of the 17 players (11.8%) were drafted by NFL teams.

No. 7 – BUY or SELL …

BUY-SELL.gif




(Sell) Knowing that there's no real number that serves as a ceiling, I don't think we'll see guys get pushed out of the class, but it might mean that more guys from the program are "processed" in order to fit them all in next August.



(Buy) I hate watching football games that don't matter and far too often on college football weekends, we're limited to one or two games each week mattering. In my mind, cutting the dead weight and streamlining the sport is going to lead to a better product on our televisions each week. There's not a single team that will get left out of the super heavyweight conferences that I really care about.



(Sell) I can't buy that until I see some evidence. I know the smart thing for me to say as the owner of this site is to tell you yes, but I wouldn't be able to look myself in the mirror if I started to just tell you what you wanted to hear. Hell, this entire column this week is full of stuff I'm not sure any of you want to hear or see.



(Sell) Come on...



(Buy) That's an easy one for me because I definitely think Johntay Cook is going to get his fifth star and Connor Stroh will get bumped up to four stars.



(Sell) Eight will likely do.



(Buy) There's no reason to think that Texas' ability to recruit California is going to decrease in the coming years.



(Sell) I don't think the game is going to be that close.



(Sell) I want you to know that you get an A+ for creativity and consideration for the question that you've asked, but generally speaking, alumni wealth isn't a major consideration for most kids making decisions.



(Buy) I think he wins the Heisman if all of that happens.



(Sell) It would likely be really close and it would likely mean that this season is a disaster on the field and that Sarkisian is in real trouble. I'm still selling, but it would be damn close. The pitchforks would definitely come out.



(Buy) This is still a defense that lacks proven playmakers. That hasn't changed.

No. 8 - Scattershooting on the sports weekend ...

... The NBA is freaking never boring. Never.

... I'm not sure where I want Kevin Durant to be traded, but please don't let it be the Boston Celtics. I can live with anything else, but I can't live with that.

... The Lakers trading for Kyrie Irving when the rest of the league won't touch him is pretty much the most Lakers thing ever. I can't believe LeBron James is going to trust the rest of his "prime" years with Irving. What could possibly go wrong?

... Zion is just stealing money at this point. Hundreds of millions.

... P.J. Tucker is a Sixer. That makes me really happy.

... It's almost time for me to be a fantasy football commish. I vow to be a better commish this season. I'm tired of @Anwar Richardson suggesting I hand control over to someone else.

... I'm thinking I'm going to take my kids to an Astros game this month.

... For the Texas hard-ball fans out there. This will make you smile.


... Mo Salah! Mo Salah! Running down the Wing! Consider me very surprised that FSG gave Salah the money he wanted in order to get him to agree to an extension. Consider me a happy boy.

... I may or may not have cackled this weekend when the Cristiano Ronaldo news came out of Manchester on Saturday ...

... I have a hunch Wimbledon is going to be really good this week.

No. 9 - The List: Top 10 Guns N Roses songs ...



Never in a million years would I have believed 25 years ago that Guns N Roses would be touring in 2022, but somehow we've made it.

And Carrie Underwood is performing with them.

It seems like as good of a reason as any to do a Top 10 list. I'm sure there will be zero disagreement.

10. Live and Let Die
9. Mr. Brownstone
8. Rocket Queen
7. Estranged
6. Patience
5. Knockin on Heaven's Door
4. Paradise City
3. Sweet Child O' Mine
2. November Rain
1. Welcome to the Jungle

No. 10 - And Finally ...

Dogs, man. Dogs.

I stopped reading all the numbers analysis about 3 stars etc, at your first paragraph - where you point out that it takes 3 years to develop a 3 star and most top tier programs simply can’t invest that time. The rest is interesting analysis but the real point is your very first one IMO. You might repeat that simple part over and over. The math is the math.

I don’t think wealthy alumni is a cause and effect deal in recruiting. Wasn’t thinking that was the question. Does seem like a possible correlation though with the emergence of NIL.
 
I stopped reading all the numbers analysis about 3 stars etc, at your first paragraph - where you point out that it takes 3 years to develop a 3 star and most top tier programs simply can’t invest that time. The rest is interesting analysis but the real point is your very first one IMO. You might repeat that simple part over and over. The math is the math.

I don’t think wealthy alumni is a cause and effect deal in recruiting. Wasn’t thinking that was the question. Does seem like a possible correlation though with the emergence of NIL.

I had you at hello!
 
I'm not the smartest guy in the room.

However, I probably have a stronger grasp of this discussion, the metrics involved in player success in recruiting and how it relates to Texas football better than anyone on the planet.

Having a PHD in one thing doesn't mean you're the smartest person in the world. It just means you are an expert in a particular field.
I don’t have any doubt you are in fact the smartest most knowledgeable person on the planet on the topic. And maybe more importantly, that you have an expert working knowledge of it all. I think there’s much more to this than the analysis and suspect that you will in fact continue to pull the string and present all the other interesting facets of this. I think that what you’re going thru now is just the messiness of an iterative learning process. Keep being curious. There’s so much more to this and not many people that can figure it out before it’s obvious to everyone.
 
I had you at hello!
Yep. Would like to hear more of your thoughts on why 3 stars? How we got here? Why can’t we win with them? Why do we continue to sign them? Why is it so obviously unnecessary to sign them? How many do you still actually need? Etc etc
 
Yep. Would like to hear more of your thoughts on why 3 stars? How we got here? Why can’t we win with them? Why do we continue to sign them? Why is it so obviously unnecessary to sign them? How many do you still actually need? Etc etc
And maybe you said all this already and I just didn’t have the patience to read thru the analysis.
 
I don’t have any doubt you are in fact the smartest most knowledgeable person on the planet on the topic. And maybe more importantly, that you have an expert working knowledge of it all. I think there’s much more to this than the analysis and suspect that you will in fact continue to pull the string and present all the other interesting facets of this. I think that what you’re going thru now is just the messiness of an iterative learning process. Keep being curious. There’s so much more to this and not many people that can figure it out before it’s obvious to everyone.

1656982444335.png
 
Yep. Would like to hear more of your thoughts on why 3 stars? How we got here? Why can’t we win with them? Why do we continue to sign them? Why is it so obviously unnecessary to sign them? How many do you still actually need? Etc etc
I few thoughts...

a. I think I've probably revealed a fraction of some of my deeper thoughts on the subject. It's pretty radical stuff compared to the traditional way of program-building. I picked three stars because it was a generic way of talking about the three tiers of prospects.

1. elite of the elite
2. guys semi close to that
3. everyone else.

b. We kind of got here because I started feeling very guilty about the way we present recruiting to you guys, knowing that part of the problem with changing minds in 2022 is that they've become brainwashed by the traditional hype attached to recruits that I started to learn how far smaller value than anyone would ever know.

It's been gradual, I'd say, over the last 5-7 years. The addition of the Portal and the one-transfer rule, combined with NIL, has sent my brain into overdrive.

c. I like puzzles. I love in business trying to win the slight margins. I love it in fantasy sports. If I make a trade in fantasy football, I've probably spent hours working on the projections involved in gaining narrow margins of success. I love the concept of Moneyball. I love that it's a proven concept.

d. You can't win with them at the very highest levels because they just aren't elite, very generally speaking. Not developing them at plus-margins compared to the rest of the country is doubly problematic.

e. They continued to be signed because they've always been signed. It's just the way for a lot of people.

f. In a year where you're taking 25 incoming players AND you are a national-level program, I'm taking 15 high school kids and 10 guys in the portal. If I'm taking 30, I'd probably take 20 high school kids (ball park) and I'd make room for the best 3-5 based on evaluation and historical supporting data.

If they pan out, great, if not, they get replaced within a couple of years.
 
You haven't... anywhere.

This particular analysis has never been done before anywhere. If I'm wrong, feel free to show me a link.

I understand that this specific analysis is new, but it’s essentially new numbers to support the same conclusion you’ve made over and over again. Low level prospects outside of the top 150 or so rarely pan out and aren’t worth recruiting.

I don’t want sunshine and I’m not saying you haven’t brought facts to back up your position, I’m just saying that it’s the same position you’ve made a lot of times with slightly different flavors of the same support.

Anyone who reads your work has to get it by now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DRodge5
I understand that this specific analysis is new, but it’s essentially new numbers to support the same conclusion you’ve made over and over again. Low level prospects outside of the top 150 or so rarely pan out and aren’t worth recruiting.

I don’t want sunshine and I’m not saying you haven’t brought facts to back up your position, I’m just saying that it’s the same position you’ve made a lot of times with slightly different flavors of the same support.

Anyone who reads your work has to get it by now.
I thought the breakdown of every single Texas Longhorns player that has ever been ranked in that tier.... all 153 of them... would be interesting Texas Longhorns content that has never quite been combed through... on a holiday weekend
 
@ketch get what you’re saying, but with 85 dudes someone has to be at bottom of roster and not get drafted. cant quite see a scenario where you only take high 4s or 5s and 3s developed by other teams. Not sure that math works at scale across the blue bloods.
 
@ketch get what you’re saying, but with 85 dudes someone has to be at bottom of roster and not get drafted. cant quite see a scenario where you only take high 4s or 5s and 3s developed by other teams. Not sure that math works at scale across the blue bloods.

That's not quite what I would suggest.

What I would suggest is that you eliminate as many high risk takes as possible and that you almost have to train yourself to know when to say when.
 
@ketch get what you’re saying, but with 85 dudes someone has to be at bottom of roster and not get drafted. cant quite see a scenario where you only take high 4s or 5s and 3s developed by other teams. Not sure that math works at scale across the blue bloods.
Take the inverse of this.. would Texas be better off if they only took players in the transfer portal + five stars?

edit: btw enjoyed the awesome breakdown on a holiday weekend! Great content in a weekend typically devoid of it.
 
Last edited:
Take the inverse of this.. would Texas be better off if they only took players in the transfer portal + five stars?
No. Too much of a revolving door IMO.

In an 85-man roster, you'd probably hope it looks something like this.

20-25 High level recruits (based on averaging 6-8 per year and knowing that many will leave after three years)

25-30 players acquired in the portal (based on taking 7-10 per year and knowing some are one-year rentals. This number begins to hit this number in 2024. Little too aggressive in the early days of the Portal.)

That's going to leave between 30-40ish prospects to fill out the roster and you're probably taking 10ish per year.

Those 10 prospects per year need to have as little highest risk prospects as possible. At a school like Texas, it's very possible for the overwhelming majority of these prospects be national 250 type guys.

You probably don't need to extend yourself to a three star level tier more than 2-4 times each year.

IF.... IF... IF...

You are recruiting at a true nationally elite level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stl.pony
There is no time like the present to become educated on things. Co-signing an argument from someone that doesn't want to be educated isn't the look anyone should seek.,
That’s a pretty arrogant comment about a paying customer presenting honest feedback. But as long as I’ve lurked on this site, sadly I can admit it was not entirely unpredictable. Trust me, despite having above average knowledge of the recent history of our program I still have plenty of desire to continue being educated on Texas football, but it’s become apparent that it comes less and less from this site. And to address your comment above, I wouldn’t say it’s you that’s spoiled us. Sadly, it’s become clear that it’s your competitor who has done the spoiling. At the end of the day, I guess it’s my fault for having unrealistic expectations.
 
That’s a pretty arrogant comment about a paying customer presenting honest feedback. But as long as I’ve lurked on this site, sadly I can admit it was not entirely unpredictable. Trust me, despite having above average knowledge of the recent history of our program I still have plenty of desire to continue being educated on Texas football, but it’s become apparent that it comes less and less from this site. And to address your comment above, I wouldn’t say it’s you that’s spoiled us. Sadly, it’s become clear that it’s your competitor who has done the spoiling. At the end of the day, I guess it’s my fault for having unrealistic expectations.
ok, bud.
 
What was personal. I don’t even know you. It was about your opinion and the way you chose to frame a pretty damn historic week of recruiting.
" boring as poop garbage says more about you than anything else."

I mean... what does it say?
 
I just can’t fathom how close minded so many of you are to this discussion

You’d think we were Alabama and trying. To cling to the old at of things that had brought us so many titles

This change is GREAT for us - we have our crap together when it comes to the portal so far if we can improve our record we could really take off
 
Ketch great analysis- why do we as Texas fans get so hyped up on some of the commits we are going in this class - if they aren’t truly elite difference makers? Like im
Starting to not see why people get so amped about a top 300/400 type player committing ?
 
Ketch great analysis- why do we as Texas fans get so hyped up on some of the commits we are going in this class - if they aren’t truly elite difference makers? Like im
Starting to not see why people get so amped about a top 300/400 type player committing ?

a. It's fun and exciting. Like new toys when you're 7.

b. Dreaming about the future is always better than hanging on to a shitty past.

c. Not everyone understands the historical failure rates of recruiting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ut84 and TexasRads
There’s a famous saying that goes “f*ck them kids.” Except insert brain dead Pollyanna OBs for kids. Keep slinging the facts.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT