Why do you think Cherry is fast? Did you watch the tape? He looks like Daylon Mack running down the field at FB. Watch the film and tell me who is faster.
Recruiting thread (2016)
- Thread starter utisdabomb12
- Start date
- Status
Why do you think Cherry is fast? Did you watch the tape? He looks like Daylon Mack running down the field at FB. Watch the film and tell me who is faster.
We're just talking prospects dude chill out a bit. Im not a huge fan of Cherry no biggie. He does not look like a big 12 linebacker IMO. Wheeler depends on how he adapts to Mike, hes intriguing to me. I like Morroe better then both. He's quick , instinctive has film taking on blocks and getting through traffic. He just needs to add some size but I think he's a very good player.
way not to actually answer the question, its obvious you've seen them in a foot race.
I've seen them both play. I've seen both of their timed measurements. Cherry is faster. Fact. UT had the #1 ranked recruiting class in 2015 in the state of Texas. Also fact. Just because you don't want to believe fact or reality, don't make stuff up about me.
Dude, don't take our word for it. Simply read the skill set ranking for Wheeler, Cherry and Moore. That's the order they'll go in. Per 247
The only plus side measurable for Moore per the gurus is his lateral movement and instinct. Wheeler and Cherry are with him in both categories and advanced in all others.
The only real plus for Moore is that he is on campus...
if you want to talk about pursuit and speed, this kid is going to be fun to watch at SAM... Talk about fitting the Big 12 mold, he made big plays in that same Semper game Moore was at... we had a stellar LB class!
http://www.hudl.com/v/CsMKV
Heck, even this kid fits the Big 12 mold http://www.hudl.com/v/DCMTB both have 4.6 speed.
The only plus side measurable for Moore per the gurus is his lateral movement and instinct. Wheeler and Cherry are with him in both categories and advanced in all others.
The only real plus for Moore is that he is on campus...
if you want to talk about pursuit and speed, this kid is going to be fun to watch at SAM... Talk about fitting the Big 12 mold, he made big plays in that same Semper game Moore was at... we had a stellar LB class!
http://www.hudl.com/v/CsMKV
Heck, even this kid fits the Big 12 mold http://www.hudl.com/v/DCMTB both have 4.6 speed.
Last edited:
Don't confuse pooch with facts. They're meaningless to him. What he wants to be true is the truth.
I didn't say Cherry is fast, but he's faster, and a much better tackler, than Moore. You just said Cherry is slow, if so then Moore is molasses in the winter. 4.75 is good speed for a MLB. Not a Big 12 LB? He reminds me a lot of Aaron Harris, but hits harder. I guess you probably didn't like Harris either, huh?
Agree to disagree, Moore will be a better college linebacker then both IMO. I went back and watched film on all 3 and im not sure its close. I don't get the Wheeler hype at all plus he plays half the time at defensive end (which he is better at on film).
Jonathan Stewart and Sean Porter in 2012, Darian Claiborne in 2013 was on his way to being a star. I am really excited about our top 4 guys in Alaka, Washington, Hilliard and Walker, they just need to stay healthy.
Did you really just ask that? So you're one of those Aggy's that thanks just by adding Chavez their defense is going to improve big time? It's not just the DC they had issues with tackling etc. that also falls on position coaches at the very best I see Aggy as breaking in or around top 50 Texas will be better than that.
Pretty much this. They took #s this recruiting cycle because they couldn't land one decent one. They are hoping one of these projects pans out.
If you don't know who we have on our roster why don't you just keep your mouth shut...
I know what you have, problem is you think it's worth a flip. I just wanted to see if had an actual argument here. It's clear you don't.
You're an idiot, little troll..
Shiro Davis
Tank Jackson
Hassan Ridgeway
Naashon Hughes
More than capable DL with depth to back them up...
POOCH!!! "Charles O isn't even fast on film and doesn't get into the backfield." Ur probably right about Charles being fast BUT did you watch him own that OL.....maybe Elbert in that camp. I know u watch quite a bit of film so maybe someone could post it for ur viewing pleasure. Oh..oh I can hear the spin about how those drills are soooo Defensive bias. Oh and I just think Chris Warren just wasn't big enough for the SEC. Aggsy writing aggsy jokes themselves lol
Another OL offer is out. The kid I brought up that is committed to TCU, Austin Myers. http://247sports.com/Recruitment/Austin-Myers-65805/RecruitInterests
Texas offered Duncanville defensive tackle Marcel Southall (@marcel_southall) last night. His recruitment seems to be picking up.
Texas offered Duncanville defensive tackle Marcel Southall (@marcel_southall) last night. His recruitment seems to be picking up.
Last edited:
This kids recruitment is taking off... Since he received his Texas offer, he has received 5 more including OU, AGGY and LSU.
The one thing I love is aggsy delusion.
All during Mack's tenure, no matter how bad the aggsy class was, they never stopped telling everyone how underrated it was and how they were going to be better than Texas.
You have a great offensive class, I have no doubts, but it's not all great, especially when you don't know if you will keep your QB, and it's looking like you won't. and you didn't get any RBs of note.
I'd say it was great for the offense you run, and that is what it's all about.
As for Texas you got 1 player in Mack that is someone Texas would take, you have a few others that are pretty good, but don't think you can compare your class to the Texas D class. It doesn't compare. Your best linebacker is on par with our 4th best we took and far below Jefferson and Cherry. Your delusion that more is better than Cherry is on par with some of my favorite arguments like Reggie is better than Vince and Farmer is better than Benson. Cherry is better, stronger and faster than Moore, the numbers don't lie. The offer list doesn't lie either.
Your argument about the safety position is even funnier since it's a spot that has a lot smaller impact on the passing game than corner does. Just look at the NFL draft, every year there are multiple corners taken and very few safeties in the first two rounds. I look at your safety class and it's not bad, but it's not better than the Texas class. At best I'd call it a wash, but on number of high quality safeties I'd take our class.
Again, You have a great WR and Oline class, but the Texas WR class is still pretty damn good. You have a great offensive line class, we got some good kids as well. There is about a 25% chance you have a QB in this class. You have a very good TE, we might have a great one, if not you win that position. Hands down we have a better RB class, and it isn't close.
So outside of wr and oline, your class is far below Texas. The Texas class isn't perfect, we didn't get the QB we wanted and we missed on a couple of DTs and offensive linemen, but we killed it at every other position, and this is definitely a class to build upon.
All during Mack's tenure, no matter how bad the aggsy class was, they never stopped telling everyone how underrated it was and how they were going to be better than Texas.
You have a great offensive class, I have no doubts, but it's not all great, especially when you don't know if you will keep your QB, and it's looking like you won't. and you didn't get any RBs of note.
I'd say it was great for the offense you run, and that is what it's all about.
As for Texas you got 1 player in Mack that is someone Texas would take, you have a few others that are pretty good, but don't think you can compare your class to the Texas D class. It doesn't compare. Your best linebacker is on par with our 4th best we took and far below Jefferson and Cherry. Your delusion that more is better than Cherry is on par with some of my favorite arguments like Reggie is better than Vince and Farmer is better than Benson. Cherry is better, stronger and faster than Moore, the numbers don't lie. The offer list doesn't lie either.
Your argument about the safety position is even funnier since it's a spot that has a lot smaller impact on the passing game than corner does. Just look at the NFL draft, every year there are multiple corners taken and very few safeties in the first two rounds. I look at your safety class and it's not bad, but it's not better than the Texas class. At best I'd call it a wash, but on number of high quality safeties I'd take our class.
Again, You have a great WR and Oline class, but the Texas WR class is still pretty damn good. You have a great offensive line class, we got some good kids as well. There is about a 25% chance you have a QB in this class. You have a very good TE, we might have a great one, if not you win that position. Hands down we have a better RB class, and it isn't close.
So outside of wr and oline, your class is far below Texas. The Texas class isn't perfect, we didn't get the QB we wanted and we missed on a couple of DTs and offensive linemen, but we killed it at every other position, and this is definitely a class to build upon.
I didn't respond to this yet, so I thought I'd address it now.
Vasser blows away anything you got at DE, and as was mentioned above, Charles O is a speed rusher and far superior to what Lockhart does. You know how I know Charles O is better? Because at the end, Texas stopped recruiting Lockhart and Sumlin kept on recruiting Charles O pretty hard. Not only that, but one of the first kids that but one of the first kids Jim Harbaugh started to recruit when he took over at Michigan was Charles O. That tells me right there who the better prospect was.
I will give you the nod at DT, especially since I really like Keke, I actually think he will be a better prospect than Mack. Mack is immature and doesn't handle himself very well. I don't think he can handle the lights of big time college football.
- Status
Latest posts
-
-
Did you have any “woke” professors at UT or the college you attended?- Latest: btorangecrush
-
-
-