ADVERTISEMENT

Fournette and McCaffrey will sit out the bowl.

You actually believe this? We've had 3 straight losing season and were still drawing at least 85,000 for our games. And 85, 000 is a conservative estimate.

And there are other schools that aren't big time, and TT is a good example, that regularly sell out their home games. And btw, their stadium holds more than 60, 000 so don't think you can put the small stadium bit.

And there are others . Most of the schools that don't draw well are non P5 schools.

No I don't. I was just being sarcastic. I agree with you. Stanford has won conference championships and BCS bowls and generated plenty of revenue in the years before McCaffery wore the uniform. To make him responsible for ticket sales and revenue this year is a bit of a stretch. Just like clearly our fans are showing up to see the name on the front of the jersey not the back.
 
I'm tired of hearing about athletes making money for their schools. How about their full scholarships? At least 90%, and probably more, of college graduates owe thousands of dollars in loans to get through school. It takes a long time to pay if off. During this primary season we learned that is a big cottage industry for the people that make those loans. And have you forgotten that a college education is the equivalent of an intense full time job for 4-5 years?

HOWEVER

Athletes do not have this issue. Their education is paid in full. They do not have to pay loans after graduation. But we all know that 50% at most graduate. As someone mentioned above they have advantages, access to tutors being one of them that the regular student does not have.

Next time please spare me of how much money they make for their schools because they get a lot in return.
As coaches and admin salaries continue to explode, and the money keeps rolling in what the athlete gets will look smaller and smaller. I'm not saying it isn't valuable. Just saying it's a drop in the bucket compared to what everyone is making off if them. Think about it. Would a school really give 90 free rides if it wasn't cost effective?

You also are forgetting that every student on campus can apply for the thousands of scholarships they are out there through various sources. Also every other student can workmif they choose the athletes wouldn't have the time even if they wanted to.
 
As coaches and admin salaries continue to explode, and the money keeps rolling in what the athlete gets will look smaller and smaller. I'm not saying it isn't valuable. Just saying it's a drop in the bucket compared to what everyone is making off if them. Think about it. Would a school really give 90 free rides if it wasn't cost effective?

You also are forgetting that every student on campus can apply for the thousands of scholarships they are out there through various sources. Also every other student can workmif they choose the athletes wouldn't have the time even if they wanted to.

What's the going rate at UT 4 year degree in Business?
 
A scholarship has real value but it has no liquidity at all, so a scholarship of X is not the same receiving payment of X. Not that I am arguing against you.
 
I disagree with this. While Stanford has put a lot of players in the league, McCaffrey is a transcendent player. Broke records that Barry Sanders held, how long ago was that? Fournette I could go either way. I just think that neither one of these programs has the success they have had without those two players.

O for good sakes dude. Christian McCaffrey a transcendent player? And Andrew Luck wasn't? And he was just five years ahead of McCaffrey. And even though Washington won the Pac XII this year the fact remains that Stanford has the top fb program on the West Coast. They have made a financial commitment to athletics. They have made the same dramatic improvement in facilities as Baylor has. Probably nicer than ours. They have a top ten coach. And Stanford is so rich, maybe even richer that UT which is saying a lot. Their coach is in the Tom Herman level in salary. They're so rich they can pick up the whole tab.

And with David Shaw as their hc another great player on the Andrew Luck level will show up real soon.
 
O for good sakes dude. Christian McCaffrey a transcendent player? And Andrew Luck wasn't? And he was just five years ahead of McCaffrey. And even though Washington won the Pac XII this year the fact remains that Stanford has the top fb program on the West Coast. They have made a financial commitment to athletics. They have made the same dramatic improvement in facilities as Baylor has. Probably nicer than ours. They have a top ten coach. And Stanford is so rich, maybe even richer that UT which is saying a lot. Their coach is in the Tom Herman level in salary. They're so rich they can pick up the whole tab.

And with David Shaw as their hc another great player on the Andrew Luck level will show up real soon.
Never said Andrew Luck wasn't transcendent player, he definitely was. I was just saying that McCaffrey put together two of the best seasons ever by a individual. Just saying Stanford isn't on prime time TV this year without McCaffrey, which means he has brought that university a ton of money.
 
But you recognize that there are other revenue generators besides players right? Who are the revenue generators for the 2010-2016 longhorn football program?
 
  • Like
Reactions: swVAHorn
But you recognize that there are other revenue generators besides players right? Who are the revenue generators for the 2010-2016 longhorn football program?
Yes I agree that there are other revenue generators for football programs. All of that to say, I don't blame any of these guys for skipping one meaningless game. To me it is very similar to the way the NFL preseason games work
 
It's the f 'ing Sun Bowl who the hell cares. Slow day in media for them to bash this kid.
 
I respect your thoughts but I disagree. Most schools and that includes the big boys want to be in a bowl game and are mature enough to know that you're not going to be in the Rose Bowl every year. I will always respect Mack Brown for his w/l record in bowl games and most of them weren't BCS/NYS level. Ftr, MB was 10/5 in bowl games. Schools that approach bowl games the way Oklahoma does are outnumbered by the ones that don't.

And if this thing mushrooms don't be surprised that one day a player on a playoff team decides to pull a McCaffrey. And you're right in college a player shouldn't be allowed to sit out games. And if they try that in the NFL their careers will be over. I wonder how NFL scouts will approach McCaffrey and especially Fournette.
NFL scouts wont care either will anyone else its the Sun Bowl.....
 
What's the going rate at UT 4 year degree in Business?
Let's say 4 years at UT is 200k multiplied by 90 scholarship football players is 18 million dollars. That is a drop in the bucket compared to what the university brings in from donations both athletic and academic. We both know a lot of these BMD are donating to academics as well.

Let's put it this way if it wasn't cost effective for UT to offer full ride scholarships to its football players they wouldn't do it. People don't understand what a racket college sports has become because some are just focused on the free education. I'm not saying that isn't valuable, but it's not out of the kindness of their heart the school is doing it because in the end they will benefit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ASURAM2010
Why do you think Colt didn't come back and play 2nd half Bama game? That's why he was talking to his dad at half time, about his NFL futures if he did play.There oughta be a rule that ya gotta Grad to play in NFL.



Hook'em
If I remember correctly his arm was numb and he couldn't throw the ball.
 
It's the f 'ing Sun Bowl who the hell cares. Slow day in media for them to bash this kid.

Not sure anyone is "bashing" them it's just not a team mentality. Even coaches and former players are making comments about it. To say no one cares is ridiculous! The players that are playing in the bowl game care and especially the seniors that won't make it to the NFL. They helped these players get the opportunity to get drafted that individual didn't just do it all by himself. It's a team sport and although I understand there's money that's driving this I still think it is selfish.

Unless the player is recovering from an injury of course.
 
Last edited:
Let's say 4 years at UT is 200k multiplied by 90 scholarship football players is 18 million dollars. That is a drop in the bucket compared to what the university brings in from donations both athletic and academic. We both know a lot of these BMD are donating to academics as well.

Let's put it this way if it wasn't cost effective for UT to offer full ride scholarships to its football players they wouldn't do it. People don't understand what a racket college sports has become because some are just focused on the free education. I'm not saying that isn't valuable, but it's not out of the kindness of their heart the school is doing it because in the end they will benefit.
You want to empty out the stands and cut television ratings? Convince the people that the games don't matter. Look at NFL Pre-Season games. More empty seats than attendees. The BMD's aren't giving to watch exhibition football. Yes, I have a problem with Coach K getting $4 million from Nike and players getting nothing. But capitalism is not a 4 letter word -- just because the school is making money is not the issue. The issue is these guys putting themselves ahead of their teammates and their school. Thank goodness that Fournette and McCaffrey aren't Marines. We might be speaking German and watching soccer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: outhereincali
I would say CBS and the people who actually attend the Sun Bowl probably care :)
exactly the people trying to make money. Has nothing to do for the players. 15k people going to these meaningless bowl games. you can find more at a Texas high school playoff game.
 
Not sure anyone is "bashing" them it's just not a team mentality. Even coaches and former players are making comments about it. To say no one cares is ridiculous! The players that are playing in the bowl game care and especially the seniors that won't make it to the NFL. They helped these players get the opportunity to get drafted that individual didn't just do it all by himself. It's a team sport and although I understand there's money that's driving this I still think it is selfish.

Unless the player is recovering from an injury of course.
So him suiting up and playing a couple series would make you feel better?
 
FYI - Shock Linwood, who doesn't even start, has announced he is skipping the Cactus Bowl for Baylor. He won't get drafted - SMH.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bwilk55
exactly the people trying to make money. Has nothing to do for the players. 15k people going to these meaningless bowl games. you can find more at a Texas high school playoff game.

Now you really don't know what you're talking mr new poster. Bowl like the Sun Bowl are always sold out. It's the sporting event of the year in El Paso. While it's never had a premium attraction the people in El Paso always fill it up.
 
It is actually 80 some percent graduate.

The players do make more money for their schools than cost of attendance.

I get your points though. It is a good argument from both sides.

If it's 80% than I stand corrected. But lets be honest. So many of those majors are mickey mouse, degrees that won't get you far in the real world. I was looking at a Baylor web site a few days ago and they were listing the players on their team who had recently graduated. You wouldn't believe how ridiculous they were. And if were going to be honest our school is guilty like the others. And often they're majors that are reserved for athletes.

I appreciate your ability to disagree without being sarcastic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swVAHorn
Now you really don't know what you're talking mr new poster. Bowl like the Sun Bowl are always sold out. It's the sporting event of the year in El Paso. While it's never had a premium attraction the people in El Paso always fill it up.
Doesn't take away from the fact that these bowls are watered down mean nothing in the grand scheme of things.
 
Him supporting his team and being there for them just like they were for him would be great. Guess we're all raised a little different.
He has nothing else to prove as a student athlete. The kids are there for free gifts and to have a good time. I guarantee you his teammates don't think any less of him as a teammate. But go ahead and cry about the good ol days and win one for the gipper all you like.
 
He has nothing else to prove as a student athlete. The kids are there for free gifts and to have a good time. I guarantee you his teammates don't think any less of him as a teammate. But go ahead and cry about the good ol days and win one for the gipper all you like.

1. I'm not old enough to remember the "gipper" .
2. No one said he had anything to prove.
3. No one is crying.
4. It's just not a team oriented decision.
5. You have no idea how all his team members feel and neither do I.
6. Don't get your panties in a bunch man it's just a forum.
7. Are you a millennial?
 
  • Like
Reactions: team1984
If it's 80% than I stand corrected. But lets be honest. So many of those majors are mickey mouse, degrees that won't get you far in the real world. I was looking at a Baylor web site a few days ago and they were listing the players on their team who had recently graduated. You wouldn't believe how ridiculous they were. And if were going to be honest our school is guilty like the others. And often they're majors that are reserved for athletes.

I appreciate your ability to disagree without being sarcastic.
I may have given a number wrong though. I was thinking TOTAL scholarship athletes in all sports men and women. So you are more than likely right on the % when it comes to athletes that make their school money. Because I think only a few sports actually make money and the rest lose money.

You are also right most schools have degrees to get players through.
 
I may have given a number wrong though. I was thinking TOTAL scholarship athletes in all sports men and women. So you are more than likely right on the % when it comes to athletes that make their school money. Because I think only a few sports actually make money and the rest lose money.

You are also right most schools have degrees to get players through.

I don't mean to digress but I'll bet you the graduation rate for women's athletes is higher, a LOT higher than for men's. And I'm willing to bet the degrees they get are more meaningful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: swVAHorn
We all know that if it weren't for football a lot of these guys would have no business in college. Some simply don't have the faculty to take advantage of that scholarship and walk away with a 100k+ education. That's why so many are in meaningless degree programs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: outhereincali
We all know that if it weren't for football a lot of these guys would have no business in college. Some simply don't have the faculty to take advantage of that scholarship and walk away with a 100k+ education. That's why so many are in meaningless degree programs.

Well at least some of them won't carry the debt after leaving.
 
You want to empty out the stands and cut television ratings? Convince the people that the games don't matter. Look at NFL Pre-Season games. More empty seats than attendees. The BMD's aren't giving to watch exhibition football. Yes, I have a problem with Coach K getting $4 million from Nike and players getting nothing. But capitalism is not a 4 letter word -- just because the school is making money is not the issue. The issue is these guys putting themselves ahead of their teammates and their school. Thank goodness that Fournette and McCaffrey aren't Marines. We might be speaking German and watching soccer.
The bowl games don't matter. The coaches actions prove that. As does the fact that there are many years where there are more Bowls than eligible teams. How many of the bowl games actually sell out? If college football wants to generate revenue. This isn't the way to do it.
 
The bowl games don't matter. The coaches actions prove that. As does the fact that there are many years where there are more Bowls than eligible teams. How many of the bowl games actually sell out? If college football wants to generate revenue. This isn't the way to do it.
You're nuts. $500 million in payouts. That's FIVE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS paid to the schools. 15 bowl games drew more than 50,000 fans. Are there too many bowls? Absolutely, but that is a different argument. But to condemn all bowls as meaningless is ridiculous. In my opinion.

http://www.espn.com/college-footbal...0-million-first-year-college-football-playoff
 
You're nuts. $500 million in payouts. That's FIVE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS paid to the schools. 15 bowl games drew more than 50,000 fans. Are there too many bowls? Absolutely, but that is a different argument. But to condemn all bowls as meaningless is ridiculous. In my opinion.

http://www.espn.com/college-footbal...0-million-first-year-college-football-playoff
if you got rid of the bowl games and had a 16 team playoff instead you'd gemereare 2 billion dollars easy

The bowl games may not be meingless but the fact that coaches don't even stay to coach them before taking other jobs should tell you that they don't mean a whole hell of a lot.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT