a. The point was that he wasn't all-sec in the first-team sense, not that he didn't earn some second or third tier conference honors. The context of the comment is critical here. The larger point is that the notion that his profile was so large that teams wouldn't take him because of the large attention he would bring is nonsensical.
b. You pointed out this place could be toxic and responded by assuming the worst about my intentions and responding with your own intended form of toxicity.
c. I wasn't being toxic. We're 300+ responses in this thread and 99% of them have been very cordial. The one that hasn't been is the one trying to teach a lesson about toxicity (which was never mentioned) with more toxicity.
I literally apologized for anything that unintentionally made you feel bad. Maybe you didn't see this message. It seems like you ignored it.
On the other hand, you not only didn't apologize for your intended toxicity, but you doubled down on it with a sermon.
Be better, indeed.
Have a blessed day.