Ok, we’re paddling upstream in a douche canoe re the damn good classification. Is it fair to say Shaka at least deserves some damn respect?
He hasn't proven to be n above-average power five coach yet. I've stated that many, many times. It's in the article.He is the definition of an average power 5 coach.
His record at a power 5 school is 47-46, which statistically is an almost perfectly average record.
He is the 5th best coach in a 10 team league.
When ranking all coaches from power 5 schools, he falls somewhere in the 20-30 area. Out of 65 schools, that sounds pretty average.
So what tangible evidence are you using that justifies him being an above average power 5 coach? You obviously do not want to discuss his X's and O's to prove your point, so lets compare him with his peers.
Shaka took a perennial tournament team and in year 2 tied Bob F Weltlich for the alltime loss record. In year 3 he’s hoping to avoid missing a second straight tournament. Neither Barnes or Penders did that.Rick had a 16-18 season towards the end. Didn't win in the Tournament. Didn't win a conference title. Fell apart late annually.
He's at least there, which isn't good enough.
For his work this season? Yeah.Ok, we’re paddling upstream in a douche canoe re the damn good classification. Is it fair to say Shaka at least deserves some damn respect?
No, but both coaches had disaster seasons on their watch, just like Shaka a year ago.Shaka took a perennial tournament team and in year 2 tied Bob F Weltlich for the alltime loss record. In year 3 he’s hoping to avoid missing a second straight tournament. Neither Barnes or Penders did that.
Vs top 25 and power 5. Total - 10-10 and 4-7 respectivelyat VCU?
It is OK for anyone to be disappointed with a number of our close losses this year....we all are. However, anyone who does't appreciate what a great job Shaka Smart is doing in building a sustainable winning program with integrity and class doesn't know their butt from a hole in the ground about college basketball.
I am excited about where he has our program headed. Think about what he inherited when you consider minutes for 4 of the 5 positions on the floor this year are being filled with players in their first year at UT. We only likely lose one of those guys next year. Things are looking up!
Quit bitching and support this guy and the Horns.
Ok.I like Garrett Wilson and sure hope we get him. But, there's no way he ranks ahead of DeMavin Leal and certainly not 10 spots better. Then again this is just Rivals' rankings, which aren't particularly respected by those who follow recruiting closely..
Considering he was at VCU, that's pretty good.Vs top 25 and power 5. Total - 10-10 and 4-7 respectively
Count here if you want.
2014-2015 2-2 0-2
2013-2014 2-1 1-0
2012-2014 2-4 0-3
2011-2012 1-2 0-2
2010-2011 2-1 2-0
2009-2010 1-0 1-0
It depends on the starting and finishing line. The Barnes at the end wasn't the Barnes in the beginning or middle.
who is throwing out last season?Since we’re throwing out shaka’s Last season can we throw out Barnes last couple? It’s only fair
I think I am misunderstanding your argument then.He hasn't proven to be n above-average power five coach yet. I've stated that many, many times. It's in the article.
@Ketchum - First off I won't say that Shaka isn't a good coach, I would say that it doesn't appear to this point that he is a great coach, though I was hoping that would be true when he was hired...
You're also missing a ton of other evidence though...that you are conveniently leaving out....
1) Besides the Final Four Run - a hot team that got good matchups / with guard play that got hot at the right time of the season from outside - shooting above their season average by a significant clip from beyond the arc....what were his other Tournament Results at VCU? Hint - not good. So that isn't exactly a Fact - the one seasons results are a fact - but the post-season results are more "nuanced" than that.
2) Those season win totals are significantly inflated - in comparison to a Power 5 school / playing in a conference in which VCU has more resources that its opponents - and those schedules were not tough in the OOC schedules either - but you're using them as if the benchmark stands as a Fact / and its certainly more "nuanced" than that.
3) His weaknesses on offense / of a team's offense are ones that followed him from VCU - if you goto the Rams message board now, or even when he was hired / it's all they would complain about - poor free throw shooting and an offense that didn't have direction. Even when they had veteran players and point guards btw.
Also, in his first year at VCU he did win the NIT.
I'm not sure that Shaka is that guy.I think I am misunderstanding your argument then.
Ok... agreed he's a damn good coach (and a better person).
Agreed...he as not demonstrated he is or can be a good power 5 coach.
I think the Texas fans want a coach that competes for Big 12 basketball titles (reg season and post) and NCAA tournament wins. Not sure Shaka is that guy (and I am on the another year train for a lot of reasons).
OK, so based on a strawman argument with a hypothetical ignoramus of your own devising, you now claim to have irrefutably proven that Shaka is doing a great job. Irrefutable? This is a Rush Limbaugh-esque level of of delusional self-inflation. I love you Ketch, but you're better than that.
Look, I appreciate some of your points:
The bottom line for me, though, is simple. I expect our coach to have a team that is mentally prepared to compete every time they take the floor. I expect him to have an offensive system that takes advantage of his team's talents, creates mismatches against other teams' weaknesses, and put points on the board consistently. And I expect to see improvement - both individually and as a team - over the course of the season. Instead we have yet another year where this team periodically shows signs of regression and is, often as not, simply painful to watch.
- Recruiting has been exceptional under Smart, especially considering our record (although I'd argue we put a lot of eggs in the Keldon Johnson basket and got badly burned this year).
- We are a young team (although in year 3 that starts to look like the coach's fault)
- The Big 12 is a really tough conference (although with KU down it's the best opportunity in over a decade for a title)
- We've been competitive with some great teams (although we always seem to lose those down the stretch, and for every Duke game this year we seem to have a KSU letdown to match)
- Smart has done a great job before at VCU (although he did it in a mid-major conference where all that was needed was a good tourney run)
- Texas is a tough place to win. We have always been a football school (although in some ways this helps, as our hoops program isn't burdened with teh expectations that a KU, UK or Duke job carries).
I'm not saying Shaka is terrible in all aspects of coaching, I'm not trying to get the guy fired, and I'm not asking for Final 4. But I do think it's very fair - especially in year 3 - to have serious doubts about whether Shaka is going to get it done here. I'm at an Agent Mulder level "I want to believe" with Smart, but based on the evidence so far I just can't see it happening.
He basically made many of the same points I made.Another very good synopsis.
16-18 vs 11-22 aren’t the same. But if you must, it’s one disaster out of 17 vs one out of 2 and it might be 2 if 3.No, but both coaches had disaster seasons on their watch, just like Shaka a year ago.
I don't disagree with any of that.16-18 vs 11-22 aren’t the same. But if you must, it’s one disaster out of 17 vs one out of 2 and it might be 2 if 3.
Just to be clear, I’d love nothing else than for Texas to finish strong and go on a run this March. I pull for ALL Texas teams and coaches. That doesn’t mean I can’t have serious doubts deep into year 3.
I was hoping you’d come around.I don't disagree with any of that.
Yes, I bet that has crossed his mind.Do you think Lon Krugar is thinking to himself this weekend, "How did we lose twice to a team with shitty coaching?"
That's funny.Yes, I bet that has crossed his mind.
I loosely agree with that.Do you think Lon Krugar is thinking to himself this weekend, "How did we lose twice to a team with shitty coaching?"
==============================================
Well, I don't know if Lon Krueger has thought that, but it has sure crossed my mind several times since Saturday.
.....................................................................................................
You don't think a guy that took a team slotted into the play-in game as a No. 11 seed in the NCAA Tournament to the Final Four can coach? A guy who coached a team to consecutive wins over an 11-seed, a 10-seed, a 6-seed, a 3-seed and a 1-seed can coach?
========================================
I sort of loosely equate winning a BCS (pre playoff)bowl game in football to making the final four (or at least the elite eight) in basketball. And Charlie Strong did that. Then he followed it up the next year with an 11 win season and a bowl win against Miami.
That's more than fair.Interesting take on Smart. I admire your willingness to go against the conventional wisdom of the OB community with your support of a coach struggling to keep his head above the .500 mark. I'm not close enough to the program to evaluate what goes on at practice or their team meetings but I was impressed with his public persona when he was hired. He is an impressive representative for the program but he better get things turned around on the court. Next year is year four and I believe he needs to win close to 25 games, finish in the top three or four in the Big 12 and win a game in the ncaa tournament to keep his job. I hope he does whatever he needs to do because I like what he brings to the program otherwise.
You have a weird habit of labeling your opinion as the truth. You picked a bunch of stats that paint a positive picture. There are plenty that can be picked that paint a very negative picture.
When you take a highly subjective and largely meaningless statement like “is someone a good coach”, you can offer any number of facts on either side. Good compared to what? Our last coach? Reasonable expectations? An objective and results-based analysis? Performance relative to the talent on the roster? Performance relative to preseason expectations?
Your incredibly condescending and frankly bizarre habit of making definitive statements and then acting indignant when anyone disagrees is tiresome. I’m out.
I would contend most on this board have never done a better job at their own jobs when faced with the type of hand he's been dealt.
I haven't skipped over anything. You saying it doesn't make it true,just repetitive.
You know they are 16 and 11 right now, right? Even if they lost all four remaining games (unlikely), and lost their opening Big 12 Tourney game (unlikely), they would still be 16 and 16, which is .500.47-46, probably ends year 3 with a losing record. Damn good coach? Do you think he’s our coach after next year? The B12 is a real basketball conference, not a mid major.
Funny what gets ignored, huh?Fascinating thread...
Seems a lot of people read the first words and skipped parts like this
"A fair assessment of his first three seasons in Austin: decent, disaster and damn good. I'll defend Smart in a lot of areas, but I can't argue that the totality of his three seasons have equated to definitive, tangible success."