ADVERTISEMENT

Ketch's 10 Thoughts From The Weekend (Losing the battle, but winning the war?)

Did he really do a number on Texas?
I think he did when we couldn't contain him. Momentum changed in a hurry after a couple of plays when we couldn't get to him which I think got in some of our players heads. Georgia actually got better on offence when he replaced Beck, and our D bent more cuz we couldn't rattle or get to him.
 
Talk about a raw conversation. Ewers has been here three years. He is somewhere in between an A+ and a B-. He isn't entirely responsible for our 11 wins or our 2 losses. Would we be 13-0 with Manning? Probably not. Would we be 9-4? Probably not. Yes, the offensive line and receivers have to do better than they did in the two games against Georgia. But Ewers has to play a whole lot better too to put this team on his shoulders and run the table. If Ewers doesn't step up in a big game, Manning does bring certain things to the table that Ewers doesn't, namely a better deep ball and a running threat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baguette
I don't think he belongs. 🤷‍♂️
I know you're still butt hurt from him beating us at the 2023 RRR. Gary Danielson and the other announcer who did the Duck game on Saturday sure thinks he belongs but what do they know especially Danielson who happened to play QB in the NFL and do college games every Saturday but I'm sure they know less than you.
🤷‍♂️
 
Has the OL really struggled outside of games against UGA?
Good point. We ran 137 in this past game against Georgia, 186 against eaTme, 174 against Kentucky, 138 against Arkansas, 205, against Florida, and only 124 against Vandy. I completely forgot we only ran for 29 yards against Georgia the first time! Damn that stinks. I looked up our rushing stats compared to the big players:

Tennessee is 9
ND is 10
Penn is 19
Alabama is 41
Arkansas is 42
Clemson is 43
Miami is 45
Ole Miss 47
Indiana 51
Oregon 53
Auburn 62
Texas #64.

I was surprised to see that Georgia is currently ranked #98 in rushing yards. I think in order to be a top tier team we need to be rushing a lot better than slightly above 50% of FBS. I would say that our offensive line plays a big part in this, but also understand our short passing game is somehow a form of our running game. We definitely miss Baxter and could have used Clark.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ketchum
I didn't say it was Sark's job to groom someone for the NFL .
Sark's job is to utilize the talent available on the team in the most efficient manner .
I said his actions are because of loyalty to Quinn and that is in conflict with his responsibilities .
You are absolutely right, and it’s frustrating to watch.
 
After the Arkansas game, I realized that this team is like Saban’s early years at Alabama. We have an elite defense that can win any game if the offense does just enough to give the D a cushion and does not make too many critical mistakes (e.g., Quinn's pick 6 at Kyle Field, Bert missing FG's against Georgia). It’s extremely frustrating given Sark’s background and the fact that Quinn is a third year starter playing behind a very experienced offensive line, but it won't change this year. It is what it is.

Hopefully the ‘Horns have a similar ending as those Bama teams (e.g., 2009, 2011).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: UT Horn and Ketchum
I think he did when we couldn't contain him. Momentum changed in a hurry after a couple of plays when we couldn't get to him which I think got in some of our players heads. Georgia actually got better on offence when he replaced Beck, and our D bent more cuz we couldn't rattle or get to him.
At the end of the day, he had a sub 100 rating as a passer and a limited, but still impactful, role as a runner.
 
I know you're still butt hurt from him beating us at the 2023 RRR. Gary Danielson and the other announcer who did the Duck game on Saturday sure thinks he belongs but what do they know especially Danielson who happened to play QB in the NFL and do college games every Saturday but I'm sure they know less than you.
🤷‍♂️
I just don't think he's an elite player. Very, very good? Yes.

Why would I be butt-hurt about 2023?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mile 20
Good point. We ran 137 in this past game against Georgia, 186 against eaTme, 174 against Kentucky, 138 against Arkansas, 205, against Florida, and only 124 against Vandy. I completely forgot we only ran for 29 yards against Georgia the first time! Damn that stinks. I looked up our rushing stats compared to the big players:

Tennessee is 9
ND is 10
Penn is 19
Alabama is 41
Arkansas is 42
Clemson is 43
Miami is 45
Ole Miss 47
Indiana 51
Oregon 53
Auburn 62
Texas #64.

I was surprised to see that Georgia is currently ranked #98 in rushing yards. I think in order to be a top tier team we need to be rushing a lot better than slightly above 50% of FBS. I would say that our offensive line plays a big part in this, but also understand our short passing game is somehow a form of our running game. We definitely miss Baxter and could have used Clark.
That's all fair.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT Horn
That’s funny!!
Happy Adam Scott GIF by Sky
 
B/S - Ohio State loses to Tennessee in the first round and they Fire Ryan Day

we get in on Sanchez, Pettijohn

B/S - Ohio State loses to Tennessee and hire Bill Belichick
 
B/S - Ohio State loses to Tennessee in the first round and they Fire Ryan Day

we get in on Sanchez, Pettijohn

B/S - Ohio State loses to Tennessee and hire Bill Belichick
double sell
 
ee0e3a40b744e2eebc3b4d949eaa9055x.jpg

Texas might have lost the battle on Saturday, but won the war on Sunday.

Same for Penn State.

In the aftermath of the release of the playoff bracket on Sunday morning, it became very clear very fast what has been suspected for months ... being No. 5 and No. 6 might be more advantageous than actually being No. 1 or No. 2.

While the Longhorns and Nittany Lions have to play an extra game and assume all of the extra risks of added attrition that come with it (see Georgia), there's no question that getting Arizona State and Boise State in the quarterfinals, respectively, instead of having to potentially play Ohio State or Notre Dame is a bonus.

Every Texas fan is thinking the same thing. You HAVE to make the semifinals. Period. Hell, Texas fans have said for the last 11 months that Texas had to make the semifinals this season for the season to be a success, but now they really have to make the semifinals.

Then you have to potentially beat Oregon and Georgia. It doesn't feel like anyone is shooting from the lay-up line from a pathway standpoint, but in being forced to play an extra game, Texas caught a break in round two that winning the SEC wouldn't have provided. From my vantage point coming in, the thing you wanted if you were Texas was being on the other side of the bracket from Georgia and not having to face either of the top two seeds before the semis.

Major mission accomplished.

The major question I have for the Longhorns might center around the collateral damage that occurs with regard to the team's health leading up to a semifinal. Survival is the name of the game. When Isaiah Bond got his ankle rolled up on in the fourth quarter on Saturday, it felt like a nail in the coffin for ever expecting that he's going to be truly right for the rest of the season. It's possible that this single injury issue might ultimately derail the Texas season short of the largest goal, but there are other personnel land mines that could yet pop up to add to the injury anxieties.

Of course, at some point the Longhorns will have to play sustained championship-level football.

Otherwise, we'll remember this season for the Longhorns having lost both the battle and the war.

No. 2 - Initial Playoff Projections ...

GeSyvhmWkAAlT8M


Let's start with Texas vs. Clemson.

For all of the Ewers/Klubnik discussion that will take place for the next few weeks, just know that Texas is definitively better than the Tigers. I might take Cade Klubnik over Quinn Ewers if forced to pick ... might ... but the rest of the position battles in this game favor the Longhorns in a big, big way.

I've got chalk in the first round ... Texas, Penn State, Notre Dame and Ohio State all advance.

Texas and Penn State will roll in the second round, while Georgia and Oregon will have to survive serious scares, but I expect both to do so.

That would leave Texas vs. Oregon and Penn State vs Georgia.

I don't think Texas is better than Oregon and I haven't really seen the Longhorns play at a level over the last two months that gives me confidence that the team will step up in that match-up. Give me the Ducks and Dawgs in the semis and the Ducks in the final.

Assuming the Ducks can get through Ohio State, which is less than certain.

No. 3 - About Quinn ...

Never has a conference championship loss ever felt like losing in the conference tournament final like it did on Sunday as soon as the bracket was announced.

Saturday no longer matters as it relates to what happens moving forward. It's fish wrap.

Therefore, I really don't have it in me to continue a debate on what subjective word we should use to describe the play of Quinn Ewers against Georgia. Call it what you want. I really don't care.

Here's what I would say coming out of the game and into a potential four-game slate to win a national championship ...

Texas cannot win a national title if ...

* The offense struggles in the red zone and can't score more than one offensive touchdown in any future match-up.

* Ewers keeps having these multi-quarter segments where he plays at an abysmal level. In the second and third quarters on Saturday, the Texas offense scored threee points and didn't come close to sniffing the end zone while Ewers delivered a 103 game rating during that stretch. Stretches exactly like this have existed in every game but one since Ewers returned from injury against Oklahoma.

* Ewers goes 2-of-7 for 5 yards and an awful sack in his last eight drop-backs with the game ultimately on the line.

Ewers has to play better. Many of you get so frustrated with me over my use of the efficiency rating as a metric to define quarterback play, but I like it because there's no confirmation bias in it. It doesn't get in its feels if the data reflects something it doesn't like. Is it perfect? Of course, not. Is it non-subjective? Entirely.

The data says that Ewers has played like a replacement-level player in the final month of the season.

462648940_3842079152746259_8620569101167652647_n.jpg


Texas hasn't scored more than two offensive touchdowns in three of the last four games. In all three of those games, Ewers' efficiency levels were below those that he posted as a first-year starter (132.6) in 2022. It's not my opinion that he's playing at levels worse than roughly 90 quarterbacks across the country. It's math. It's not my opinion that he's delivered multi-quarter stretches in seven of the last eight games that rank below Wyoming quarterback Evan Svoboda's worst ranking in the country in pass efficiency. That's math.

Consider the opposition's quarterback numbers in each of UT's two losses to Georgia this season.

GeTa258XoAAdjv0


On paper, the Longhorns should have not only won both games, but run away with them. They didn't win either game because Ewers (and the entire offense) couldn't play at anything remotely close to successful levels. The offensive inefficiency isn't all on Ewers. That would be completely unfair. Yet, he's the freaking quarterback. If he plays poorly, Texas is playing with two hands tied behind its back.

If it happens again this season, Texas will go out of the playoffs with a loss. It feels as simple as that.

No. 4 - Scattershooting on the Horns...

* Texas is 5-4 in games that Quinn Ewers throws for 300+ yards in his career. The losses? Oklahoma State in 2022. Oklahoma in 2023. Washington in 2023. Georgia in 2024.

* Against the three most difficult teams on the Texas schedule, the Longhorns have scored 15, 17 and 19 points. That feels important to note going into the playoffs.

* The more I think about it, the more I’m convinced that Andrew Mukuba played one of the best championship games I've ever seen a player have in a Texas uniform. He was the single best player on the field on Saturday for my money.

* The latest mock draft by The Ringer's Danny Kelly has Cam Williams going 11th overall in the first round.

* If Jahdae Barron loses the Thorpe Award to Travis Hunter, we riot. (Note: I'm an idiot. Hunter isn't a finalist.)

* Tre Wisner is 137 yards away from 1,000 yards.

* Matthew Golden has 47 receptions for 738 yards and 8 touchdowns. He's averaging more than 6 catches and 103 yards per game in his last three games. If the Longhorns make it to the semis, there's a good chance that he could finish the season with around at least 60+ receptions, 1,000+ yards and 10+ touchdowns.

* Colin Simmons is two sacks away from 10 in his freshman season. What a stud.

* Alfred Collins has two fewer pass break-ups (7) than Barron (9). Way to get your hands up, big fella.

* Updated Texas Scholarship Board

462555715_491319270028676_6466547752734354582_n.jpg


No. 5 - Portal Needs ...

The Portal opens on Monday! The Portal opens on Monday! The Portal opens on Monday!

I've been told that Texas will be very, very active in the Portal.

Let's go position-by-position and analyze where Texas might be shopping with some of its unspent Michael Fasusi NIL funds:

Quarterback: The Longhorns aren't going to be looking at a quarterback unless Trey Owens does something unforeseen.

Running Back: After yesterday, I'm back to thinking the Longhorns need a starting upgrade from the Portal if they can find one. Tre Wisner is the best back on campus and he's averaging 4.9 yards for the season and has six games this season with less than 3.8 yards per carry. Texas doesn't have anything remotely close to an elite player at running back on campus. If it can find one, Texas should.

Wide Receiver: You know Sark is going to find him a hoss. Or two. How many wide receivers Texas takes might depend on whether Isaiah Bond and Matthew Golden come back for another season.

Tight End: Yes, Texas needs help. No matter how much we all might like Jordan Washington, the Longhorns are going to come into next season with five career receptions at the tight end position and zero proven blockers. They cannot take chances. A starting-level addition is needed.

Offensive Line: Texas needs one or two starting-level interior linemen because there are real questions about what's left once the seniors depart. Do I think Kyle Flood and Sarkisian will do it? No, I'm not convinced at all.

Defensive Tackles: The Longhorns will sign at least two. Maybe three. I was told three last week when there was thought that the Longhorns would sign Justus Terry.

Defensive End: Unlikely. Texas is fairly loaded coming into next season, especially if Trey Moore returns.

Linebacker: Maybe. It's not a critical need, but if the right player became available, you'd have to at least kick the tires. Yet, Anthony Hill, Liona Lefau, Tyanthony Smith and Bo Barnes make a pretty salty one through four at the position next season. A depth piece wouldn't be a bad insurance policy.

Cornerback: With the Longhorns returning Malik Muhammad and Kobe Black, while adding Kade Phillips (among others), I'm not sure the Longhorns will look to spend much focus here unless someone big falls in their lap. For instance, what sense would Georgia transfer Julian Humphrey make for either party?

Safety: The Longhorns are loaded with elite-level talent. Maybe you'd look for an Andrew Mukuba type if he became available, but does Texas really want to add players that are going to keep someone like Jonah Williams off the field?

Punter/Place-kicker/Kickoffs: A little birdie told me this weekend that the Longhorns will have an interest in Michigan punter Tommy Doman, who entered the Portal last week. Look for Steve Sarkisian to look to add two kicking pieces from the Portal.

That would leave a potential Portal class looking like this:

QB: 0
RB: 1
WR: 1 or 2
TE: 1
OL: 1-2
DT: 2 or 3
LB: 0
CB: 0
S: 0
P/K: 2

Total: 8-11 players

For every additional scholarship that becomes available, you can think about adding a possible depth piece.

No. 6 - If I had a vote that mattered ...

1. Oregon
2. Georgia
3. Texas
4. Notre Dame
5. Penn State
6. Tennessee
7. Ohio State
8. SMU
9. Indiana
10. South Carolina

Heisman Trophy

1. WR/CB Travis Hunter (Colorado)
2. RB Ashton Jeanty (Boise State)
3. DE Abdul Carter (Penn State)
4. CB Jahdae Barron (Texas)
5. QB Kurtis Rourke (Indiana)

No. 7 - This and that ...

... Texas Volleyball handled its business this weekend in taking out Texas A&M CC and USC in six sets in the first two rounds of the NCAA Tournament. Next up is a match-up against No. 2 seed Creighton and if the Longhorns can pull that off, No. 1 seed Penn State in Happy Valley looms. It's not an easy path, but it's doable with a team of this pedigree. Madisen Skinner will have to be every bit the superstar every night moving forward that she was this weekend. FYI, Creighton swept Ole Miss in three to get to the Sweet 16.

... It does not bode well for the men's basketball team that they were never really in Sunday's game against U.Conn. Are the Huskies a possible Elite 8 or better team? Yes. Was Texas completely outclassed at home by such a said team? Yes, they were. Not even really good games from Tre Johnson and Arthur Kaluma changed that.

... 22 combined points from everyone other than Johnson and Kaluma tells a certain kind of story...

... Although Texas beat James Madison on Sunday, it was a disappointing week for the Texas women's basketball team when you consider that it had Notre Dame on the ropes in South Bend in the SEC/ACC Challenge, only to get outscored 12-2 in overtime in a loss. That happened on a night when Texas actually knocked down eight threes. I'm still not sure what to fully make of what Vic is working with. They are going to be a handful all season, but is this a Final Four team? Not unless Rori Harmon keeps making progress and returns to the levels she was playing at before the knee injury.

... Here are Harmon's numbers from this season compared to last season ...
462558445_2098369890581876_5606031249780802942_n.jpg


... The Texas women's basketball team will now play five straight mostly worthless games before it opens up SEC play at Oklahoma on January 2. Plenty of time for this team to continue to work out some kinks.

No. 8 – BUY or SELL …
shutterstock_197241950.jpg




(Buy) Texas 31 Clemson 17



(Buy) Ewers has posted less than a 138 efficiency rating in six of his last eight games. These are the numbers: 131, 110, 154, 235, 129, 137, 130 and 122.



(Buy) Oh, he has all kinds of designs. Will he use them? That's where I have doubt.



(Buy/Sell) I'm buying the top paragraph and selling everything below it.



(Sell) It's not just Saturday's game that has showed us that. This team is overcoming the worst stretch of statistical play that Ewers has had in his entire career.



(Buy) He'll play, but maybe not effectively.



(Sell) Make it 15-20.



(Sell) Bama will do what it takes to keep him. Or that place will burn.



(Sell) Nope.



(Sell) Quinn is Geno Smith. Once you see it, you'll never unsee it.



(Sell) That's not realistic. He just needs to be better.



(Sell) Why on earth would you think, barring injury, that Arch would play more than Quinn?



(Buy) Texas is the crown jewel of the conference.



(Buy) That's an elephant in the room. It probably never happens again.



(Sell) It's a great question, but I'm not sure that either sets up Texas nicely. I'm in the middle on it. Texas hasn't scored more than two touchdowns in three of its last four games. Not sure playing Oregon is a more favorable match-up.



(Buy) I'm a homer for Michael Terry and I'm not quite as high on Pickett as Rivals is.



(Buy) If I was on a desert island, I'd go with the tenders.



(Buy) Probably. Wingo simply isn't going to have a breakout this season.



(Sell) I'll believe it when I see it.



(Sell) This offense is what it is after 13 games. If it could be done, it would already be done.

No. 9 – Scattershooting all over the place …

* Say what you want to about Oregon, but that team creates an interesting style match-up for every team it plays. If it goes through Ohio State, Texas and Georgia to win a national title, it will have proven to be an all-time great kind of team. That would mean wins over the No. 2, No. 5, No. 6 and No. 8 (twice).

* I would have put Alabama in over SMU. The Mustangs getting in means that Texas needs to start canceling some of these high-risk non-conference games it has scheduled.

* I don't think Georgia can win a national title with Carson Beck, but it might be able to with Gunner Stockton now that the young player will have three weeks to settle in as the starter.

* Damnit, it sucked beyond belief to see Jonathan Brooks go down on Sunday with a non-contact right knee injury just weeks after returning from his right knee ACL injury from last season. Damnit.

* Saquan Barkley for MVP? Yeah, I think so.

* As bad as the Sixers (7-15) have been this season, Joel Embiid and Co. are only 2.5 games of the 8-seed, 4 games back of the 7-seed, 4.5 games back of the 6-seed and 5 games back of the 5 seed. Let's go, fellas. Go on a run.

* I'm not sure that Austin FC will ever know what it means to celebrate an MLS Cup title like the LA Galaxy did this weekend. You have to have really good players to do that.

* Premier League Thoughts: Arsenal and Man City drop points ... again? Yes, please. If I'm being honest, the MVP of the weekend was Storm Darragh because it gave Liverpool a nice little rest on paper. Chelsea don't really look like a title contender this season to my eyes, but they remind me of Arsenal from two years ago. That team is going to be a handful. Geez, Spurs, y'all are going to get Ange fired, huh?

No. 10 – The List: Timothee Chalamet

GeONNPfbwAAqa4v


As the greatest living actor under the age of 40 and since three recent movies he's served as the lead have made a combined $2+ billion at the box office, I thought we might do one for the kids this week.

I give you the king of College Game Day ... fan of SMU football... and correct user of the Hook'em ... the and only ... @echeese and @duqu's favorite ... Timothee Chalamet.

There's a part of me that plans on going to see the new Bob Dylan movie this week out of Orangebloods spite. That being said, Chalamet has quite the Top 10 list going for him when you consider that he's only 28 years old. He has 10 legit credits to his name that are 100% worthy of your time.

Let's get to it.

Honorable Mention: Beautiful Boy, Miss Stevens and Don't Look Up

10. The French Dispatch

It's a young Chalamet getting it on with Frances McDormand in a smaller part of a Wes Anderson movie.

9. Bones and All

A romantic cannibal film ... who hasn't been asking for this for most of their lives? If you can get beyond the ... uh ... cannibalism ... it's actually a really interesting film.

8. Interstellar

He plays Matthew McConaughey's son in this Christopher Nolan classic that is still worthy of discussion after a decade has gone by. If he'd had a bigger role, this one would be ranked higher.

7. The King

Have you seen this on Netflix? I revisited it this weekend and it's really good. If you like period dramas, I think you should give it a watch. Chalamet is great in it.

6. Call My by Your Name

Some will ave this at No. 1, but I just can't forget that Armie Hammer is in it. Too soon. Plus, I love the top 5. L-O-V-E.

5. Little Women

He's pretty damn perfect as Laurie. I need to watch this again because I'm not sure I have seen it since it came out and I loved it when I watched it in the theater.

4. Lady Bird

I might rank this higher if he was in a lead role. This is Greta Gerwig's signature film and one of the best of the last decade.

3. Dune

Not only does he take over as the lead role in a Denis Villeneuve sci-fi masterpiece, but he does so with a level of perfection that answered almost every question that a loyal fan base wanted answered from the actor in the role.

2. Wonka

I was so skeptical coming into this movie. In fact, I was a bit of a hater. You know what? My kids loved it. You know what? So did I.

1. Dune II

The fight scene at the end of the film with Austin Butler is one of the best movie scenes of the decade.

200w.gif
What's happening in the portal?
Recruiting: Defense recruits 2- 5*, 10 - 4*, 1 - 3*; why can't the offense (1 - 5*, 7 - 4*, 4 - 3*) match the recruiting of defense? Looks like we are building an elite defense and a good offense. 3 -3* OL???
 
As tough as the two losses to Georgia are this year I am thinking about Oregon's two losses last year to Washington where Oregon was the favorite to win and considered to be the best team in the country.
 
What's happening in the portal?
Recruiting: Defense recruits 2- 5*, 10 - 4*, 1 - 3*; why can't the offense (1 - 5*, 7 - 4*, 4 - 3*) match the recruiting of defense? Looks like we are building an elite defense and a good offense. 3 -3* OL???
The Portal is evolving as we speak.
 
I don't think Texas can win a title if he's not on the field and healthy.

pretty sure I don’t disagree cause I saw very very little explosiveness out of the entire WR corp Saturday. Every drive was a slog, every catch was contested and seemed like an instant tackle which means no separation.

Just a very lackluster day for the guys being thrown to.

That said, GA is trivially the best defense we will play this year regardless of who it is. Playing Oregon would be like playing Texas tech or similar. All O, not sure if they even line up 11 each snap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ketchum
pretty sure I don’t disagree cause I saw very very little explosiveness out of the entire WR corp Saturday. Every drive was a slog, every catch was contested and seemed like an instant tackle which means no separation.

Just a very lackluster day for the guys being thrown to.

That said, GA is trivially the best defense we will play this year regardless of who it is. Playing Oregon would be like playing Texas tech or similar. All O, not sure if they even line up 11 each snap.
agreed
 
Georgia's win over us in the SECCG took a heavy toll on them. Beck is likely done for the season and I think Georgia's all world punter is out for rest of the season too.

The Georgia that is going to play in the CFP will be far from the team that we played.

What? That same team beat us in the second half
 
The number one thing this offense needs is an elite running back. Same with playoff game against Washington last year. If Brooks had finished the season last year and come back this year those inside the 20 woes would look a lot different.

No. It needs an elite QB more
 
Hey Ketch, just got a text from some young man just sent me from a Georgia fan and even I had to laugh at this creative photo of Quinn Ewers over three photos turning into Dak Prescott and it says meet Quinn Prescott QB of the Texas Longhorns Lol, I had to give the kid thumbs up for creativity on that one. Darn AI doesn't hold back opinions.
 
Hey Ketch, just got a text from some young man just sent me from a Georgia fan and even I had to laugh at this creative photo of Quinn Ewers over three photos turning into Dak Prescott and it says meet Quinn Prescott QB of the Texas Longhorns Lol, I had to give the kid thumbs up for creativity on that one. Darn AI doesn't hold back opinions.
Yeah, it's going around.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tex51
yes and with a backup QB that hasn't played at all all year mind you.

I was being sarcastic. @jtesq posted “The Georgia that is going to play in the CFP will be far from the team that we played.”

Ugh, we played the team he was talking about (minus beck and punter) in 2nd half and they won the the half. Was more a comment his post was…..dumb
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tex51
a
Yeah, because I never use full context.

No one has written more about Quinn with more layers of context than I have. Period.
all the Quinn apologists are grasping at straws at this point
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tex51
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT