Well let's go.which part of it?
I've got Brewster stories that are nearly 20 years old.
Well let's go.which part of it?
I've got Brewster stories that are nearly 20 years old.
Like a pre-editor?If you ran these things by me first, I could help you a lot.
Oh I know. Everyone who's been here long enough knows.You busted me.
I used no data.It was just emotional jibberish.Oh I know. Everyone who's been here long enough knows.
Mind you, I'm not hating on you for it. I get why you are doing it. I completely disagree with you based on real data, but again I understand why you are doing it.
This is all I've been able to see here.24-36 hours later, it is kind of amazing that an online riot broke out because I called the Texas basketball coach a damn good coach on a Texas message board.
As per usual, its the way you respond to people that typically pisses them off. Case in point:24-36 hours later, it is kind of amazing that an online riot broke out because I called the Texas basketball coach a damn good coach on a Texas message board.
I didn't ignore it in the article.Perhaps you should read before commenting.
Your facts aren't the only facts that matter.
He's doing a good job this year. Only someone who can't shake the anger from last year can't see that.
Your lack of rationality is showing.
I can't make this make sense for you. That's on you.
Some people deserve responses like that. Your $9.95 doesn't give you a license to be silly without being called out on it. This happens to you a lot.As per usual, its the way you respond to people that typically pisses them off. Case in point:
Upon a re-read, this post probably does the best job of illustrating how you consistently fail to get your point across in a reasonable manner. In this post, you say that Charlie Strong is a damn good coach. In this post, you call him the worst football coach in the history of the 100+ year old Texas football program and compare him to Michael Scott of the office, who I think we can all agree is an idiot.Charlie is a damn good coach, too. He's just not great.
I don;t know if Shaka is great.
Stated as much in the article.
It is my opinion that Strong is the worst coach in school history and the Michael Scott of college football.
Charlie is a damn good coach. He's just a buffoon as a head coach at a major program.Upon a re-read, this post probably does the best job of illustrating how you consistently fail to get your point across in a reasonable manner. In this post, you say that Charlie Strong is a damn good coach. In this post, you call him the worst football coach in the history of the 100+ year old Texas football program and compare him to Michael Scott of the office, who I think we can all agree is an idiot.
So I guess the real question is...which is it? Is Charlie Strong the worst football coach in over 100 years at Texas or is he a "damn good coach"? It cannot possibly be both.
Welp, there we have it. You clearly are not very good at articulating a point. You cannot on one hand consider someone a damn good coach and then on the hand contend he's the worst ever at a big-time school. At the end of the day, you really struggle to get your point across in a coherent way and that's why it typically takes you several (in this case 100+ posts) to defend your position. Once that position is called into question by an overwhelming majority, you get defensive and the insults and condescension begins. The reason people on here were so quick to criticize is because you did a very similar thing with respect to Shaka less than six weeks ago and waited until they finally won a Big 12 game to post this while staying silent through some pretty awful play against mediocre teams.Charlie is a damn good coach. He's just a buffoon as a head coach at a major program.
Those two things do not need to be independent from each other.
I'm not responding to any more of your nonsense. I can't make you use your brain. Or maybe you are. I can't tell.Welp, there we have it. You clearly are not very good at articulating a point. You cannot on one hand consider someone a damn good coach and then on the hand contend he's the worst ever at a big-time school. At the end of the day, you really struggle to get your point across in a coherent way and that's why it typically takes you several (in this case 100+ posts) to defend your position. Once that position is called into question by an overwhelming majority, you get defensive and the insults and condescension begins. The reason people on here were so quick to criticize is because you did a very similar thing with respect to Shaka less than six weeks ago and waited until they finally won a Big 12 game to post this while staying silent through some pretty awful play against mediocre teams.
As for your post, those two things certainly do not need to be independent of eachother because of the differing circumstances, but those two statements are diametrically opposed to eachother. It really underscores any point that you were trying to make.
I'm not responding to any more of your nonsense. I can't make you use your brain. Or maybe you are. I can't tell.
Have a blessed day.
No one is having that debate.
He does it on purpose, and it's annoying af.Welp, there we have it. You clearly are not very good at articulating a point. You cannot on one hand consider someone a damn good coach and then on the hand contend he's the worst ever at a big-time school. At the end of the day, you really struggle to get your point across in a coherent way and that's why it typically takes you several (in this case 100+ posts) to defend your position. Once that position is called into question by an overwhelming majority, you get defensive and the insults and condescension begins. The reason people on here were so quick to criticize is because you did a very similar thing with respect to Shaka less than six weeks ago and waited until they finally won a Big 12 game to post this while staying silent through some pretty awful play against mediocre teams.
As for your post, those two things certainly do not need to be independent of eachother because of the differing circumstances, but those two statements are diametrically opposed to eachother. It really underscores any point that you were trying to make.
To almost every basketball coach on the planet.True, pertinent statement to the topic at hand though.
No one is also having that debate b/c there isn't a debate. Stevens is a far superior coach.
Clearly not using your brain, be better and have a blessed day.He does it on purpose, and it's annoying af.
To almost every basketball coach on the planet.
Yes. So was John Mackovic.Was Tom Penders a damn good coach IYO?
Yes.
If your standards are that narrow, maybe the word your looking for instead of "damn good" is great.Wanted to make sure of that cause he's Shaka over the last 8 years while at Texas.
I guess the term "damn good coach" is defined differently by everyone. I don't think many fit into the category. I'd prefer a damn good coach that doles out results.
24-36 hours later, it is kind of amazing that an online riot broke out because I called the Texas basketball coach a damn good coach on a Texas message board.
I didn't expect 26 pages, claims of racism against white people and the sheer level of anger that was on display. I knew it would get reaction, just not that one.
I doubt you were terribly shocked. We are only a couple of weeks removed from your previous such infamous statement about Shaka. Obviously you are having fun.
You don't think he was a damn good coach?WTF?!?!
I didn't expect 26 pages, claims of racism against white people and the sheer level of anger that was on display. I knew it would get reaction, just not that one.