ADVERTISEMENT

Ketch's 10 Thoughts From the Weekend (Shaka is a damn good coach)

You busted me.
Oh I know. Everyone who's been here long enough knows.

Mind you, I'm not hating on you for it. I get why you are doing it. I completely disagree with you based on real data, but again I understand why you are doing it.
 
Oh I know. Everyone who's been here long enough knows.

Mind you, I'm not hating on you for it. I get why you are doing it. I completely disagree with you based on real data, but again I understand why you are doing it.
I used no data.It was just emotional jibberish.
 
24-36 hours later, it is kind of amazing that an online riot broke out because I called the Texas basketball coach a damn good coach on a Texas message board.
This is all I've been able to see here.
simpsons-mob.jpg
 
24-36 hours later, it is kind of amazing that an online riot broke out because I called the Texas basketball coach a damn good coach on a Texas message board.
As per usual, its the way you respond to people that typically pisses them off. Case in point:

I didn't ignore it in the article.Perhaps you should read before commenting.

Your facts aren't the only facts that matter.

He's doing a good job this year. Only someone who can't shake the anger from last year can't see that.

Your lack of rationality is showing.

I can't make this make sense for you. That's on you.
 
I enjoy showing up a couple days late and reading the first page, then skipping to page 25 to know that I missed nothing in pages 2-24.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seftees
Charlie is a damn good coach, too. He's just not great.

I don;t know if Shaka is great.

Stated as much in the article.
Upon a re-read, this post probably does the best job of illustrating how you consistently fail to get your point across in a reasonable manner. In this post, you say that Charlie Strong is a damn good coach. In this post, you call him the worst football coach in the history of the 100+ year old Texas football program and compare him to Michael Scott of the office, who I think we can all agree is an idiot.

It is my opinion that Strong is the worst coach in school history and the Michael Scott of college football.

So I guess the real question is...which is it? Is Charlie Strong the worst football coach in over 100 years at Texas or is he a "damn good coach"? It cannot possibly be both.
 
Upon a re-read, this post probably does the best job of illustrating how you consistently fail to get your point across in a reasonable manner. In this post, you say that Charlie Strong is a damn good coach. In this post, you call him the worst football coach in the history of the 100+ year old Texas football program and compare him to Michael Scott of the office, who I think we can all agree is an idiot.



So I guess the real question is...which is it? Is Charlie Strong the worst football coach in over 100 years at Texas or is he a "damn good coach"? It cannot possibly be both.
Charlie is a damn good coach. He's just a buffoon as a head coach at a major program.

Those two things do not need to be independent from each other.

Sidenote: I refused to take a shot at your inability to process such a simple thing.
 
For instance, George Clooney is a great actor, but he was shitty in Batman and Robin.

Dennis Hopper was a great actor, but he sucked in Super Mario Brothers.
 
Charlie is a damn good coach. He's just a buffoon as a head coach at a major program.

Those two things do not need to be independent from each other.
Welp, there we have it. You clearly are not very good at articulating a point. You cannot on one hand consider someone a damn good coach and then on the hand contend he's the worst ever at a big-time school. At the end of the day, you really struggle to get your point across in a coherent way and that's why it typically takes you several (in this case 100+ posts) to defend your position. Once that position is called into question by an overwhelming majority, you get defensive and the insults and condescension begins. The reason people on here were so quick to criticize is because you did a very similar thing with respect to Shaka less than six weeks ago and waited until they finally won a Big 12 game to post this while staying silent through some pretty awful play against mediocre teams.

As for your post, those two things certainly do not need to be independent of eachother because of the differing circumstances, but those two statements are diametrically opposed to eachother. It really underscores any point that you were trying to make.
 
Welp, there we have it. You clearly are not very good at articulating a point. You cannot on one hand consider someone a damn good coach and then on the hand contend he's the worst ever at a big-time school. At the end of the day, you really struggle to get your point across in a coherent way and that's why it typically takes you several (in this case 100+ posts) to defend your position. Once that position is called into question by an overwhelming majority, you get defensive and the insults and condescension begins. The reason people on here were so quick to criticize is because you did a very similar thing with respect to Shaka less than six weeks ago and waited until they finally won a Big 12 game to post this while staying silent through some pretty awful play against mediocre teams.

As for your post, those two things certainly do not need to be independent of eachother because of the differing circumstances, but those two statements are diametrically opposed to eachother. It really underscores any point that you were trying to make.
I'm not responding to any more of your nonsense. I can't make you use your brain. Or maybe you are. I can't tell.

Have a blessed day.
 
Welp, there we have it. You clearly are not very good at articulating a point. You cannot on one hand consider someone a damn good coach and then on the hand contend he's the worst ever at a big-time school. At the end of the day, you really struggle to get your point across in a coherent way and that's why it typically takes you several (in this case 100+ posts) to defend your position. Once that position is called into question by an overwhelming majority, you get defensive and the insults and condescension begins. The reason people on here were so quick to criticize is because you did a very similar thing with respect to Shaka less than six weeks ago and waited until they finally won a Big 12 game to post this while staying silent through some pretty awful play against mediocre teams.

As for your post, those two things certainly do not need to be independent of eachother because of the differing circumstances, but those two statements are diametrically opposed to eachother. It really underscores any point that you were trying to make.
He does it on purpose, and it's annoying af.
 
True, pertinent statement to the topic at hand though.

No one is also having that debate b/c there isn't a debate. Stevens is a far superior coach.
To almost every basketball coach on the planet.
 
Please unpin this. It is one of the worst, most non-objective, insupportable, columns Ketch has ever written.

I like Shaka very much. I still hope he succeeds here, but so far he has not been up to the job.
 

Wanted to make sure of that cause he's Shaka over the last 8 years while at Texas.

I guess the term "damn good coach" is defined differently by everyone. I don't think many fit into the category. I'd prefer a damn good coach that doles out results.
 
Wanted to make sure of that cause he's Shaka over the last 8 years while at Texas.

I guess the term "damn good coach" is defined differently by everyone. I don't think many fit into the category. I'd prefer a damn good coach that doles out results.
If your standards are that narrow, maybe the word your looking for instead of "damn good" is great.
 
24-36 hours later, it is kind of amazing that an online riot broke out because I called the Texas basketball coach a damn good coach on a Texas message board.

giphy.gif


I doubt you were terribly shocked. We are only a couple of weeks removed from your previous such infamous statement about Shaka. Obviously you are having fun.
 
giphy.gif


I doubt you were terribly shocked. We are only a couple of weeks removed from your previous such infamous statement about Shaka. Obviously you are having fun.
I didn't expect 26 pages, claims of racism against white people and the sheer level of anger that was on display. I knew it would get reaction, just not that one.
 
I didn't expect 26 pages, claims of racism against white people and the sheer level of anger that was on display. I knew it would get reaction, just not that one.

I'm glad I didn't bother going through it. I see you getting ready for "7 things thinking on a Thursday" already.

giphy.gif
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT